Second Language Task Grading and Syntactic Complexity in Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/06Keywords:
Cognition Hypothesis, Task complexity, Reasoning demands, Syntactic complexity, Triadic Componential Framework (TCF)Abstract
This study is motivated by Robinson’s Cognition Hypothesis and aims to investigate the impact of task grading along reasoning demands dimension on syntactic complexity in English as foreign language writing. The participants of the study were 90 intermediate EFL learners from three intact classes at, and a Control group. At first, the students in all groups took part in the writing pre-test which was a picture story description task. Next, the treatment sessions including 8 sessions of picture description task performance began, during which the first experimental group received a series of picture description tasks in a randomized order of cognitive complexity. The second experimental group received the same tasks, but ordered from simple to complex based on their required reasoning demands. The control group, however, did not receive any picture description tasks; rather they received some typical writing activities and performed extra writing tasks from the course book. Finally, during the last session, the post- test was administered to all participants. The results of the data analysis through Analysis of Variances (ANOVA) using the SPSS software showed a significant positive impact for sequencing tasks from simple to complex on syntactic complexity of Iranian intermediate EFL learners.References
Abdollahzadeh, S., & Kashani, F. A. (2011). The effect of task complexity on EFL learners’ narrative writing task performance. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 8, 1-28.
Bailey, E. P., & Powell, P. A. (2009). The practical writer (10th ed.). Belmont, CA, U.S.A.: Wadsworth.
Baralt, M. (2010). Task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, and interaction in CMC and FTF environments (Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, U.S.A). Retrieved from: https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/553230/baraltmelissa.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Birjandi, P., & Ahangari, S. (2008). Effects of task repetition on the fluency, complexity and accuracy of Iranian EFL learners’ oral discourse. Asian EFL Journal, 10(3), 28-52. Retrieved from: https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/main-journals/effects-of-task-repetition-on-the-fluency-complexity-and-accuracy-of-iranian-efl-learners-oral-discourse/
Birjandi, P., & Seifoori, Z. (2009). The effect of training and task-planning on the complexity of Iranian learners’ oral speech. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice,, 2(4), 57-80. Retrieved from: http://jal.iaut.ac.ir/article_524141.html
Choong, K. P. (2011). Task complexity and linguistic complexity: an exploratory study. Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 1-28.
Choong, K. P. (2014). Effects of task complexity on written production in L2 English (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://gigalib.org/index.aspx
DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499-533. Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b69e/79182e91beda071b1b68ba4ffe7c544193ff.pdf
Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language teaching research, 4(3), 193-220. doi:10.1177/136216880000400302
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language teaching and learning. Oxford, The United Kingdom of Great Britain: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 141-172. doi:10.1017/S0272263105050096
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, The United Kingdom of Great Britain: Oxford University Press.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299-323. doi:10.1017/S0272263100015047
Frear, M.W. (2014). The effects of cognitive task complexity on writing (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://aut.researchgateway.ac.nz/handle/10292/7309
Frear, M. W., & Bitchener, J. (2015). The effects of cognitive task complexity on writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 45-57.
Gilabert Guerrero, R. (2005). Task complexity and L2 narrative oral production (Doctoral dissertation, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain). Retrieved from: http://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/1662
Ishikawa, T. (2006). The effect of manipulating task complexity along the [here-and now] dimension on L2 written narrative discourse. In M. D. P. Garcia-Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp.136-156). Clevedon, The United Kingdom of Great Britain: Multilingual Matters.
Iwashita, N., McNamara, T., & Elder, C. (2001). Can we predict task difficulty in an oral proficiency test? Exploring the potential of an information processing approach to task design. Language Learning, 51(3), 401–436. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00160
Kim, Y. (2009). The effects of task complexity on learner-learner interaction. System, 37(2), 254–268. doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.02.003
Kuiken, F., Mos, M., & Vedder, I. (2005). Cognitive task complexity and second language writing performance. Eurosla yearbook, 5, 195-222. doi:10.1075/eurosla.5.10kui
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2007). Task complexity and measures of linguistic performance in L2 writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 261-284. doi:10.1515/iral.2007.012
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2008). Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(1), 48-60. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.08.003
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2011). Task performance in L2 writing and speaking: The effect of mode. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 91–104). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamin.
Kuiken, R., & Vedder, I. (2012). Syntactic complexity, lexical variation and accuracy as a function of task complexity and proficiency level in L2 writing and speaking. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.). Dimensions of L2 Performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp.143-169). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Lee, Y. G. (2002). Effects of task complexity on the complexity and accuracy of oral production in L2 Korean (Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai‘i at Manoa, Honolulu, U.S.A.). Retrieved from http://thesis1gigalib/docview/276045459
Lee, E., & Rescorla, L. (2002). The use of psychological state terms by late talkers at age 3. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23(4), 623-641. doi:10.1017/S014271640200406X
Levkina, M. (2013). The role of task sequencing in L2 development as mediated by working memory capacity (Doctoral dissertation, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain). Retrieved from: http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/54846/1/LEVKINA_PhD_THESIS.pdf
Long, M. (1989). Task, group and task-group interactions. Retrieved from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED366184.pdf
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task‐based syllabus design. Tesol Quarterly, 26(1), 27-56. doi:10.2307/3587368
Maftoon, P., Birjandi, P., & Pahlavani, P. (2014). The impact of using computer-aided argument mapping (CAAM) on the improvement of writing achievement of Iranian learners of English. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(5), 982-988. doi:10.4304/tpls.4.5.982-988
Masrom, U. K., Alwi, N., & Daud, N. M. (2015). The effects of task complexity on the complexity of the second language written production. Journal of Second Language Teaching & Research, 4(1), 38-66.
Nuevo, A. M. (2006). Task complexity and interaction: L2 learning opportunities and development (Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC., U.S.A.). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ana_Maria_Nuevo/publication/275969754.pdf
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555-578. doi:10.1093/applin/amp044
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge, The United Kingdom of Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. (1991). Communicative tasks and the language curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 79-295.
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge, The United Kingdom of Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.
Preliminary English Test (PET). (2015). Retrieved March 2016 from http://www.cambridgeenglish.org/exams/preliminary/exam-format
Polio, C. G. (1997). Measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Language Learning, 47(1), 101-143.
Rahimpour, M., & Hosseini, P. (2010). The impact of task complexity on L2 learners’ written narratives. English Language Teaching, 3(3), 198-205. Retrieved from: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/data/UQ_229448/UQ229448_OA.pdf?Expires=1576103156&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJKNBJ4MJBJNC6NLQ&Signature=N~-jnceZsD-WNnv-CA41qmVF9kSuf9s7LGyy~jbbSafGBtWdTD3JPSJKMUrhQsHeSj6BM3BRTcmig-BZFwoLuKe4NteDEUYyLkZ8u3fzgIKSzFMPqNB1ew-a48u5dkeDXea7HRcSBcA2i7tLt5UT8BkdPdhj4nKb~I3kL7W9XdhAylMdbQphDmVwfyt9nbuF-jPzwW7xUF1UYLku3W64QJ2gayxngPZlBH-Pjqi7B~-SJwxMCI556Slh~nEf1NlHDbYzJoefxcGuyuFUwMRhBNRAuTk~fWtq2Qx~yZeNZAURjTXLe0a4lRyKn4BelBhY2FN8p9Gq8Yk~sOogPRS~rA__
Revesz, A. (2011). Task complexity, focus on L2 constructions, and individual differences: A classroom-based study. Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 162-181. doi:10.2307/41413425
Robinson, P. (1995). Introduction: Connecting tasks, cognition and syllabus design. In Peter Robinson (Ed.), Task complexity and second language syllabus design: Data-based studies and speculations [Special Issue] University of Queensland Working Papers in Language and Linguistics, 1(1), 1-16. Brisbane: CLTR. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/3877258/Task_complexity_and_second_language_syllabus_design_data-based_studies_and_speculations
Robinson, P. (2001a). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287-318). Cambridge, The United Kingdom of Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, P. (2001b). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27-57. doi:10.1093/applin/22.1.27
Robinson, P. (2003). The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21(2), 45-105. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228554259_The_cognition_hypothesis_task_design_and_adult_task-based_language_learning
Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43(1), 1–32. doi:10.1515/iral.2005.43.1.1
Robinson, P. (2007a). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 191-213.
Robinson, P. (2007b). Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogic tasks. In M. G. Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 7-27). Clevedon, The United Kingdom of Great Britain: Multilingual Matters.
Robinson, P. (2010). Situating and distributing cognition across task demands: The SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In M. Putz & L. Sicola (Eds.), Cognitive processing in second language acquisition: Inside the learner’s mind (pp. 243-268). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Robinson, P. (2011). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Researching task complexity: Task demands, task-based language learning and performance (pp. 3-38). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R. (2007). Task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 161-177.
Robinson, P., Ting, S., & Urwin, J. J. (1995). Investigating second language task complexity. RELC Journal, 26(2), 62–79.
Romanko, R., & Nakatsugawa, M. (2010). Task sequencing based on the cognition hypothesis. In A. M. Stoke (Ed.), JALT2009 Conference Proceedings (pp. 436-445). Tokyo, Japan: JALT.
Salimi, A., Dadashpour, S., & Asadollahfam, H. (2011). The effect of task complexity on EFL learners' written performance. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1390–1399. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.378
Scarborough, H. (1990). Index of productive syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11(1), 1–22. doi:10.1017/S0142716400008262
Sercu, L., De Wachter, L., Peters, E., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2006). The effect of task complexity and task conditions on foreign language development and performance: Three empirical studies. ITL-Review of Applied Linguistics, 152(1), 55–84. doi:10.2143/ITL.152.0.2017863
Shatz, M., Wellman., & Silber, S. (1983). The acquisition of mental verbs: A systematic investigation of first references to mental states. Cognition, 14(3), 301-321. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90008-2
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied linguistics, 17(1), 38-62. doi:10.1093/applin/17.1.38
Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36(1), 1-14. doi:10.1017/S026144480200188X
Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510-532. doi:10.1093/applin/amp047
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185-211. doi:10.1177/136216889700100302
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language learning, 49(1), 93-120. doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00071
The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS). (n.d.). Retrieved March (2016) from https://www.wechsleradultintelligencescale.com/.
Thompson, C. (2014). Guided planning, task complexity and second language oral development. [Doctoral dissertation]. Preston, United Kingdom of Great Britain: University of Central Lancashire. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/28233565/_2014_Guided_planning_task_complexity_and_second_language_oral_development
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
