Constructionist Grounded Theory -GT. Conceptual and Methodological Clarifications

Antonio SANDU

Abstract


In this article we aim to bring a series of epistemological and conceptual clarifications on a particular method of qualitative research entitled Grounded Theory (GT) in its social-constructive approach. The peculiarity of this research method is the exploratory character, the theoretical explanatory construction based on data gathered from the field and not from a series of assumptions taken from the literature, or built from the missing knowledge areas within it. The socio-constructivist dimension emphasizes the context dependence of the obtained results and the generated interpretative model.

How to cite: Sandu, A. (2018). New Rights of the People, Deriving from the Content of the Right to Peace. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty, Section: Economy and Administrative Sciences, 3(1), 73-100. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumeneas/06 


Keywords


Grounded Theory, qualitative research, social constructivism, interpretive model, data encoding.

Full Text:

View PDF

References


Brod, M., Tesler, L. E., & Christiansen, T. L. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263-1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9

Caras, A. & Sandu, A. (2014). The Role of Supervision in Professional Development of Social Work Specialists. Journal of Social Work Practice: Psychotherapeutic Approaches in Health, Welfare and the Community, 28(1), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2012.763024.

Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin, Y & Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Charmaz, K. (2002). Constructing Grounded Theory, 2nd edition. London: Sage Publications.

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications.

Cheer, K., MacLaren, D., & Tsey, K. (2015). The use of grounded theory in studies of nurses and midwives' coping processes: A systematic literature search. Contemporary Nurse, 51(2-3), 200-219.

Chelcea, S. (2007). Metodologia cercetarii sociologice. Metode cantitative si calitative, editia a treia. Bucuresti, Romania: Editura Economica.

Chen, H., & Boore, J. R. P. (2009). Using a synthesised technique for grounded theory in nursing research. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(16), 22-51.

Cojocaru, D., Damian, R., Damian, S., Gavrilovici, O., Iliescu, L., Macarie, G., Necula, R., & Sandu, A. (2011). Stil de viata si comportament in sanatate al persoanelor cu boli cronice. Cercetare in cadrul „Studii postdoctorale in domeniul eticii politicilor de sanatate”, Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie Gr.T Popa Iasi. POSDRU/89/1.5/S/61879.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A.L. (2006). Basics of qualitative research. 3 edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 3rd edition. California, SUA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Dey, I. (1999). Grounding Grounded Theory: Guidelines for Qualitative Inquiry. London: Academic Press.

Frunza, A. (2017). Supervizarea si dezvoltarea profesionala a asistentilor sociali. Iasi, Romania: Editura Lumen

Frunza, A., & Sandu, A. (2016a). On understanding the process of informed consent. In curs de evaluare la SAGE Open.

Frunza, A., & Sandu, A. (2016b). Is Informed Consent Well Understood in the Romanian Healthcare System? Nepublicat.

Funza, A., & Sandu, A. (2017). Values grounding the Informed Consent in Medical Practice. Theory and Practice. SAGE Open. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2158244017740397

Funza, A. (2017). Supervizarea si dezvoltarea profesionala a asistentilor sociali. Iasi, Romania: Editura Lumen.

Glaser, B.G. (1992). Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.

Glaser, B.G. (2001). The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted with Description. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.

Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction.

Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business, and Market Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Guba, E.G. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In Guba, E. (ed.), The Paradigm Dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994), “Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln, (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105-17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Ioan, B.G., Hanganu, B., Velnic, A.A., Petre-Ciudin, V., Damian, S.I. (2017). When you seed violence you harvest violence-adolescent parricide. case presentation. Forensic Science International, 277(Sup. 1), 208-209.

Ilut, P. (1997). Abordarea calitativa a socioumanului. Iasi, Romania: Editura Polirom.

Keen, A. (2013). Saturation in qualitative research. Distinguishing between descriptive and theoretical saturation. Retrieved from https://my.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/511464/Research2013Th39.pdf

Kelle, U. (2005). Emergence vs. forcing of empirical data? A crucial problem of grounded theory reconsidered. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung (Forum: Qualitative Social Research), 6(2), Art. 27. Retrieved from www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/ 467/1001.

Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Manuj, I., & Pohlen, T.L. (2012). A reviewer's guide to the grounded theory methodology in logistics and supply chain management research. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(8), 784-803. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031211269758

Manuj, I., & Sahin, F. (2011). A model of supply chain and supply chain decision-making complexity. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(5), 511-549.

Markey, K., Tilki, M., & Taylor, G. (2014). Reflecting on the challenges of choosing and using a grounded theory approach. Nurse Researcher, 22(2), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.2.16.e1272

Mucchielli, A. (coord.), (2002). Dictionar al metodelor calitative in stiintele umane si sociale. Iasi, Romania: Editura Polirom.

Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Leech, N.L., Slate, J.R., Stark, M., Sharma, B., Frels, R., Harris, K., & Combs, J.P. (2012). An Exemplar for Teaching and Learning Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 17(1), 16-77.

Rubin, H.J., & Rubin, I.S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Sandu, A. (2012). Metode de cercetare in stiinta comunicarii. Iasi, Romania: Editura Lumen.

Sandu, A. (2013). The Social Construction of Autonomy and the Meanings of Autonomy for the Diabetic Patient from Doctor's Perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 2130–2135

Sandu, A. (2016a). Social Construction of Reality as communicative Action. UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Sandu, A. (2016b). Cadre normativ-institutionale ale constructiei sociale a profesiei de consilier de probatiune in zona de N-E a Romaniei si in Republica Moldova. Sociologie Romaneasca, 14(1), 23-43.

Sandu, A. (2017). Constructia sociala a profesiei de consilier de probatiune. Iasi, Romania: LUMEN Publishing House.

Sandu, A., Cojocaru, D., Gavrilovici, C., & Oprea. L. (2013). Trust: an Ethical Dimension of Healthcare in Chronic Disorders. Revista Romana de Bioetica, 11(1), 190-205.

Sandu, A., Necula, R., Frunza, A., Unguru, E., & Damian, S. (2017). A qualitative inquiry in social construction of chronic illness Case study on diabetes mellitus. Doctors perspectives. Archive EuroMedica, 2(2017), 18-23.

Sandu, A., Unguru, E., Ponea, S., Cojocaru, S. (2010). Analysis of professional competencies in supervision field of social services. Social Research Reports, 17, 3-56.

Sbaraini, A., Carter, S.M., Evans, R.W., & Blinkhorn, A. (2011). How to do a grounded theory study: A worked example of a study of dental practices. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 128. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-128

Suddaby, R. (2006). From The Editors: What Grounded Theory Is Not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633-642.

Trasa, L. (2010). Metode si tehnici de cercetare in psihologie, sinteza de curs. Universitatea Spiru Haret, Bucuresti.

Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., & Myers, M.D. (2010). Putting the 'theory' back into grounded theory: Guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Information Systems Journal, 20(4), 357-381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00328.x

Xenofontov, I. (2011). Razboiul sovieto-afghan (1979–1989). Studiu de istorie verbala. Perceptii. Documente. Iasi, Romania: Editura Lumen.

http://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo/nvivo-products

Gibbs Graham R (2013) A Discussion with Prof Kathy Charmaz on Grounded Theory, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5AHmHQS6WQ

Löfgren Kent (2013) Qualitative analysis of interview data: A step-by-step guide, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRL4PF2u9XA

Curry Leslie (2015) Fundamentals of Qualitative Research Methods: Data Analysis (Module 5), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opp5tH4uD-w


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Antonio SANDU

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright © LUMEN EAS | A LUMEN Peer Reviewed Open Access Journal