Intimacy in Romanian Couples. Implications for the Psychological Health of the Family

Milka Nicoleta APOSTU, Maria Nicoleta TURLIUC


In the variety of processes that shape a healthy couple relationship, intimacy plays a leading role as a determiner of commitment. The issue of understanding intimacy is even more up to date considering the increased number of separations during the past years and also the increased interest for therapy. The present study aims at investigating intimacy in 32 Romanian couples, the connection it has to positive emotions, dyadic satisfaction and commitment to the relationship. The main method used in the present study is a daily electronic diary, completed by each partner of the couple in the course of a week. The diary was developed on the basis of validated instruments and transformed in an electronic, user-friendly variant. The collected data encapsulates information relevant for the understanding of the dynamics of Romanian couples. The daily discussion subjects and other fill-in data that have been gathered on a daily basis, portrait the map of discussions and interests in Romanian couples, very important details regarding intimacy, self-disclosure and emotions within the couple that lead to the strong, positive bond of a healthy family.

How to cite: Apostu, M. N. & Turliuc, M. N. (2017). Intimacy in Romanian Couples. Implications for the Psychological Health of the Family. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty, Section: Social Sciences, VI(1), 63-72. DOI:


intimacy, satisfaction, psychological health, communication, commitment

Full Text:



Berne, E. (1964). Games people play. New York: Grove Press.

Buhrmester, D., & Furman, W. (1987). The development of companionship and intimacy. Child Development, 58, 1101-1113.

Horowitz, M. J., Wilner, N. R., & Alvarez, W. (1979). Impact of Event Scale. A measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 209-18.

Jourard, S. M. (1971). Self-disclosure. An Experimental Analysis of the Transparent Self. New York: Wiley.

Laurenceau, J.-P., Barrett, L. F., & Rovine, M. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 314-323.

Mackey, R. A., Diemer, M. A., & O'Brien, B. A. (2000). Psychological intimacy in the lasting relationships of heterosexual and same-gender couples. Sex Roles, 43(3), 201-227.


Moss, B. F., & Schwebel, A. I. (1993). Defining intimacy in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 42, 31-37.

Prager, K. J., & Roberts, L. (2004). Deep Intimate Connection: Self and Intimacy in Couple Relationships. In Mashek, D. and Aron, A. (Eds.) The Handbook on Closeness and Intimacy. Lawrence-Ehrlbaum.

Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. R. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In Duck, S. (Ed.), Handbook of research in personal relationships, pp. 367-389, London, England: Wiley.

Rubin, D. B. (1983). William G. Coehran's contributions to the design, analysis, and evaluation of observational studies. In S. Rao & J. Sedransk (Eds.), W.G. Cochran’s Impact on Statistics, New York: Wiley.

Rusbult, C. E., & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 175-204.

Schaefer, M. T. & Olson, D. H. (1981) Assessing intimacy: The PAIR Inventory. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1, 47-60.

Schoebi, D., & Randall, A. K. (2015). Emotional Dynamics in Intimate Relationships. Emotion Review, 7(4), 342-348.

Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28.

Watson, D., & Clark, A. (1994). The PANAS-X Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Expanded Form, University of Iowa.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © LUMEN SS | A LUMEN Peer Reviewed Open Access Journal