Intensionality, Reference and Games of Partial Information II. Semantic Verbs

Mihai Hîncu

Abstract


In this paper, I look at the semantic behaviour of the most emblematic verb of our semantic lexicon, „refer (to)”, through the prism of the semantic features considered definitory for the extensional verbs and I show that there are strong theoretical reasons for considering that it belongs to the class of ITVs and that, in consequence, it generates structural ambiguity at each level of language in which it is involved. In this regard, I show how the conceptual framework of the games of partial information can successfully accommodate the semantic verb’s inherent ambiguity. In order to accomplish this task, I present a scenario of strategic communication involving semantic verbs and I model it as a two-agent coordination game. The cognitive dynamics peculiar to the agents’ interaction will be presented on the background of some reasonable assumptions introduced to guarantee the finding of a solution concept corresponding to the game. In this regard, after I compute the expected utilities of the strategic profiles, I determine a set of Nash equilibria and I show that the game’s unique solution can be equated with that set’s member which passes the test of Paretian efficiency. In the end, I present the picture of the interplay between the speaker’s reference and the semantic reference which emerges from the game-theoretical framework adopted here and I show some of its methodological consequences related to the way in which the key concept of reference has to be theoretically framed. This is the second part of a two-part study. 


Keywords


Exportation; monotonicity; speaker’s reference; interpretation de dicto; Nash equilibrium; Pareto efficiency; intensionality;

Full Text:

View PDF

References


Abbott, B. (2010). Reference. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Almog, J. (1998). The subject verb object class I. Philosophical Perspectives, 12(S12), 39-76. doi:10.1111/0029-4624.32.s12.2

Clark, R. (2012). Meaningful games. Exploring language with game theory. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.

D’Ambrosio, J. (2017). Semantic verbs are intensional transitives. Mind (2017, December 21). doi:10.1093/mind/fzx029. Retrieved from http://justindambrosio.wixsite.com/philosophy/research

Forbes, G. (2013). Intensional transitive verbs. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, USA: Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/intensional-trans-verbs

Kripke, S. (1977). Speaker's reference and semantic reference. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 2(1), 255-276. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.1977.tb00045.x

Lappin, S. (2017). Formal semantics. In M. Aronoff & J. Ress‐Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (2nd ed.) (pp. 279-298). London, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

Moltmann, F. (1997). Intensional verbs and quantifiers. Natural Language Semantics, 5(1), 1-52. doi:10.1023/a:1008245409172

Parikh, P. (1991). Communication and strategic inference. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14(5), 473-514. doi:10.1007/bf00632595

Parikh, P. (2000). Communication, meaning, and interpretation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 23(2), 185-212. doi:10.1023/a:1005513919392

Parikh, P. (2001). The use of language. Stanford, USA: CSLI Publications.

Parikh, P. (2007). Situations, rules, and conventional meaning: Some uses of games of partial information. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(5), 917-933. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.01.004

Parikh, P. (2010). Language and equilibrium. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.

Recanati, F. (2000). Oratio obliqua, oratio recta: An essay on metarepresentation. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.

Richard, M. (2013). Context and the attitudes: meaning in context. (vol. 1). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Sainsbury, M. (2018). Thinking about things. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Ticak, M. (2016). What are ghost words?. Grammarly Blog. Retrieved from https://www.grammarly.com/blog/ghost-words/

Zimmermann, T. E. (1993). On the proper treatment of opacity in certain verbs. Natural Language Semantics, 1(2), 149-179. doi:10.1007/bf00372561

Zimmermann, T. E. (2006). Monotonicity in opaque verbs. Linguistics and Philosophy, 29(6), 715-761. doi:10.1007/s10988-006-9009-z




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/po/39

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright © POSTMODERN OPENINGS | A LUMEN Peer Reviewed Open Access Journal |

Journal covered in: Web of Sciences (WOS); EBSCO; ERIH+; Google Scholar; Index Copernicus; Ideas RePeC; Econpapers; Socionet; CEEOL; Ulrich ProQuest; Cabell, Journalseek; Scipio; Philpapers; SHERPA/RoMEO repositories; KVK; WorldCat; CrossRef; J-GATE