The Predictions on the Future of Labour are not Grounded; Some Arguments for a Bayesian Approach

Viorel Rotilă

Abstract


Expectations on predicting the future of work are not substantiated, and can only control some of the variables that define its character. The following variables could help to shape a Bayesian methodological framework of the future of labour and could interfere in modelling labour status: 1) The meaning of labour depends on the context of significance specific to each historical period; 2) The fate of labour is dependent on the ontological status of the utensil; 3) The status of labour is defined to a significant extent in the self-fulfilling / defeating prophecy horizon; 4) The normative perspective: the future of labour will be as we want it to be; but we cannot predict the evolution of our desires; 5) The present confirms to a small extent the expectations of the past; 6) Predictability in the field of labour is not protected by black swans: the evolution of artificial intelligence outlines the most important dimension of the extremistan; 7) If the decision belongs to the human, there will be at least some areas where human labour will be preferred; 8) The increase in the number of jobs and the decrease in their quality cannot be excluded; 9) the progress can also lead to the increase of the number of jobs; 10) The diminishing of social control over labour will persist. The arguments in favour of labour show that it will still exist; but we cannot be sure who and how it will be, or what status it will have. 


Keywords


future of labour; prediction; Bayesian method; fitness argument.

Full Text:

View PDF

References


Armstrong, S., & Sotala, K. (2012). How we’re predicting AI – or failing to. In J. Romportl, P. Ircing, E. Zackova, M. Polak & R. Schuster (Eds.), Beyond AI: Artificial dreams (pp. 52–75). Pilsen, Czech Republic: University of West Bohemia.

Arnold, C. (2018). Money for nothing: The truth about universal basic income. Nature, 557(7707), 626-628. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-05259-x

Beaudry, P., Green, D. A., & Sand, B. M. (2016). The great reversal in the demand for skill and cognitive tasks. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(suppl. 1), 199-247. doi:10.1086/682347

Blinder, A. S. (2009). How many US jobs might be offshorable? World Economics, 10(2), 41-78. Retrieved from https://www.princeton.edu/ceps/workingpapers/142blinder.pdf

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York, USA: Norton.

Bushman, B. J., Baumeister, R. F., & Stack, A. D. (1999). Catharsis, aggression, and persuasive influence: Self-fulfilling or self-defeating prophecies? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 367-376. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.76.3.367

Chen, S. (2018). Forget the Facebook leak’: China is mining data directly from workers’ brains on an industrial scale. South China Morning Post, 2018, April 29. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2143899/forget-facebook-leak-china-mining-data-directly-workers-brains

EUROSTAT. (2017) Employment rate by sex, age group 20-64, 1993-2016. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/t2020_10〈=en

Frey, C., & Osborne, M. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019

Heidegger, M. (2002). The origin of the work of art. In M. Heidegger, Off the Beaten Track (pp. 1-56). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Kelly, K. (2007). The Maes-Garreau point. The Technium, 2007, March 14. Retrieved from http://kk.org/thetechnium/the-maesgarreau/

Manyika, J., Lund, S., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Woetzel, J., Batra, P., Ko, R., & Sanghvi, S. (2017). Jobs lost, jobs changed: Impact of automation on work. In McKinsey Global Institute, Jobs gained: Workforce transitions in a time of automation (pp. 23-33). San Francisco, USA: McKinsey & Company.

McLuhan, M. (2003). Understanding media. The extensions of man. Corte Madera, USA: Gingko Press.

Merton, R. K., (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8(2), 193-210. doi:10.2307/4609267

Rotila, V. & Celmare, L. (2017). Analysis of a major inequity in the budgetary wage system: Gerontocracy. Arguments and solutions, In A. Sandu, A. Frunza, T. Ciulei, G. Gorghiu & A. Petrovici (Eds.), Rethinking Social Action. Core Values in Practice (pp. 730-739). Bologna, Italy: Medimond.

Spencer, D. A. (2018). Fear and hope in an age o mass automation: Debating the future of work. New Technology, Work and Employment, 33(1), 1-12. doi:10.1111/ntwe.12105

Srnicek, N. & Williams A. (2015). Inventing the future. Postcapitalism and a world without work. London, UK: Verso.

Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. New York, USA: Random House.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/po/35

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright © POSTMODERN OPENINGS | A LUMEN Peer Reviewed Open Access Journal |

Journal covered in: Web of Sciences (WOS); EBSCO; ERIH+; Google Scholar; Index Copernicus; Ideas RePeC; Econpapers; Socionet; CEEOL; Ulrich ProQuest; Cabell, Journalseek; Scipio; Philpapers; SHERPA/RoMEO repositories; KVK; WorldCat; CrossRef; J-GATE