A Novel Fuzzy Scoring Approach of Behavioural Interviews in Personnel Selection





Personnel selection, Fuzzy Scoring, behavioural interview, storytelling.


The need for a behavioural interview scoring strategy is a critical element in order to ensure an optimal organizational human capital. Behavioural interview based on storytelling approach is a technique through which career seekers are required to provide clear details of how they have handled such workloads in the past. The whole literature assumes the existence of strong correlations between the score received on the selection interview and subsequent job performance, so in this paper we intend to highlight the relationship between these two assessments as well as the modelling using fuzzy logic of a CAR alternative system for scoring the selection interview. The results demonstrated that there is a very significant association between the classic interview score and work performance (r=0.894 to p<0.01). Furthermore, there is also a significant correlation coefficient of r=0.925 at a p<0.01, between the fuzzy CAR score and job performance, thus the validity and the optimization of the procedure are fully proven.

Author Biographies

Dana RAD, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad

Assoc.Prof. PhD

Faculty of Educational Sciences, Psychology and Social Sciences

Valentina E. BALAS, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad

Prof. PhD

Faculty of Engineering


Cortina, J. M., Goldstein, N. B., Payne, S. C., Davison, H. K. & Gilliland, S. W. (2000). The incremental validity of interview scores over and above g and conscientiousness scores. Personnel Psychology, 53, 325−351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00204.x

Day, A. L. & Carroll, S. A. (2003). Situational and patterned behavior description interviews: A comparison of their validity, correlates, and perceived fairness. Human Performance, 16, 25−47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1601_2

Gibb, J. L. & Taylor, P. J. (2003). Past experience versus situational employment: Interview questions in a New Zealand social service agency. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 41, 371−383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038411103041003008

Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V. & Thomas, S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57, 639-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00003.x

Honer, J., Wright, C. W. & Sablynski, C. J. (2007). Puzzle interviews: What are they and what do they measure? Applied H.R.M. Research, 11, 79−96.

Huffcutt, A. I., Conway, J. M., Roth, P. L. & Stone, N. J. (2001). Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 897−913. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.5.897

Jansen, A., Melchers, K. G., Lievens, F., Kleinmann, M., Brändli, M., Fraefel, L. & König, C. J. (2013). Situation assessment as an ignored factor in the behavioral consistency paradigm underlying the validity of personnel selection procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 326-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031257

Klehe, U. & Latham, G. (2005). The predictive and incremental validity of the situational and patterned behavior description interviews for team playing behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 108−115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0965-075X.2005.00305.x

Klehe, U. & Latham, G. (2006). What would you do – really or ideally? Constructs underlying the behavior description interview and the situational interview in predicting typical versus maximum performance. Human Performance, 19, 357−382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1904_3

Lievens, F., De Corte, W. & Brysse, K. (2003). Applicant perceptions of selection procedures: The role of selection information, belief in tests, and comparative anxiety. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 67−77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00227

Lievens, F., Highhouse, S. & De Corte, W. (2005). The importance of traits and abilities in supervisors' hirability decisions as a function of method of assessment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 453−470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317905X26093

Ryan, A. M., McFarland, L. Baron, H. & Page, R. (1999). An international look at selection practices: Nation and culture as explanations for variability in practice. Personnel Psychology, 52, 359-391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00165.x

Taylor, P. J. & Small, B. (2012). Asking applicants what they would do versus what they did do: A meta-analytic comparison of situational and past behavior employment interview questions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 277−294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317902320369712

Topor, D. J., Colarelli, S. M. & Han, K. (2007). Influences of traits and assessment methods on human resource practitioners' evaluations of job applicants. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21, 361−376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10869-006-9033-6

Wilk, S. L. & Cappelli, P. (2003). Understanding the determinants of employer use of selection methods. Personnel Psychology, 56, 103-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00145.x




How to Cite

RAD, D., & BALAS, V. E. (2020). A Novel Fuzzy Scoring Approach of Behavioural Interviews in Personnel Selection. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 11(2), 178-188. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/11.2/81

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now