Adapting CRISP-DM for Social Sciences


  • Mihaela Cazacu The Bucharest University of Economic Studies
  • Emilia Titan The Bucharest University of Economic Studies



CRISP-DM, predictive modelling, quality of life, social sciences, analytics, modelling


The growth of available data in the social sciences led to numerous knowledge discovery projects being launched over the years. Even if the volume and the speed of data are increasing, in social sciences data has an important limitation in terms of methodological process that drives the conceptual and analytical questions posed to the data. Social sciences domain experiences several challenges in their desire of extracting useful and implicit knowledge due to its inherent complexity and unique characteristics, as well as the lack of standards for data mining projects. The aim of this research is to bring Cross-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) methodology as a standardization in analyzing large volumes of unstructured data to generate analytical insights for wellbeing and social sciences topics in general. Also, taking into consideration that for a data scientist, the most time-consuming activity is data preparation step, we are trying to make more efficient this process using a clear methodology and tasks. Conclusion is that using a strong methodology with well-defined steps in research can increase productivity in terms of time and enhance the quality of the research.


Azevedo, A., & Santos, M. F. (2008, January). KDD, SEMMA and CRISP-DM: a parallel overview. IADIS European Conference Data Mining, 182–185.

Bosnjak, Z., Grljevic, O., & Bosnjak. S. (2009). CRISP-DM as a framework for discovering knowledge in small and medium sized enterprises' data. In 2009 5th International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics, Timisoara (pp. 509-514).

Chapman, P., Clinton, J., Kerber, R., Khabaza, T., Reinartz, T., Shearer, C. & Wirth, R. (2000). CRISP-DM 1.0 Step-by-step data mining guide. The CRISP-DM consortium .

Dubitzky, Werner & Granzow, Martin & Berrar, Daniel. (2007). Fundamentals of Data Mining in Genomics and Proteomics. 10.1007/978-0-387-47509-7.

Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., & Smyth, P. (1996). From Data Mining to Knowledge Discovery in Databases. AI Magazine, 17(3), 37.

Frey, B. & Luechinger, S. (2007). Concepts of happiness and their measurement. Metropolis Verlag.

Karisik, E. (2018). A standardized Data Mining Method in Healthcare – a pediatric intensive care unit case study. Utrecht University, Information and Computer Science.

Moreira, J., De Carvalho, A., & Horvath, T. (2018). What Can We Do With Data? In J. M. Moreira, A. C. P. L. F. De Carvalho, & T. Horváth (Eds.), A General Introduction to Data Analytics (Chapter 1). Wiley Online Library.

Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. 10.1787/9789264191655-en

Sagiroglu, S., & Sinanc, D. (2013) Big Data: A Review. 2013 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), San Diego, 20-24 May 2013, 42-47.

Sarkar, Dipanjan & Bali, Raghav & Sharma, Tushar. (2018). Building, Tuning, and Deploying Models. https://doi.org10.1007/978-1-4842-3207-1_5

Vleugel, A., Spruit, M., & Daal, A. (2010). Historical Data Analysis through Data Mining From an Outsourcing Perspective: The Three-Phases Model. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 1, 42-65.




How to Cite

Cazacu, M., & Titan, E. (2020). Adapting CRISP-DM for Social Sciences. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 11(2Sup1), 99-106.

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now