The Process of Individual Decision-Making in Non-Standard Situations: a Theoretical Aspect: Theoretical and Neuropsychological Aspects
Keywords:selection process, human activity, the most difficult conditions of activity, high uncertainty, lack of time, high responsibility
The importance of knowing the processes of choice, decision-making is determined by the objective role that they play in the organization of human activity. An important feature of man is his unique ability to make decisions in the most difficult conditions of activity, which are characterized by high uncertainty, the presence of many inconsistent criteria, lack of time, high responsibility and more. The target effectiveness of the decision can be assessed only after its implementation, but the prediction of potential decisions is possible only if the study of its neuropsychological mechanisms. Cost-effectiveness is characterized by intellectual, physical, neuropsychological and material costs of decision-making. The non-standard situation, as a rule, seeks to reduce cost-effectiveness, because in this case the solutions are achieved by the exertion of intellectual, emotional and physical forces and is determined by the ability of the individual to act in such an environment. The neuropsychological mechanisms of such decisions are of interest to science in terms of ensuring the adequacy and timing of such decisions, which is hypothetically related to the morphological and psychoneurological characteristics of the subjects of action. In the context of our study, it is important to conduct a thorough psychological analysis of different types of unusual situations in the coach and find ways to improve the effectiveness of decisions, which primarily depends on the level of psychological readiness of the individual to perform its.
Andryushchenko, M. N. (1971). Ponyatiye effektivnosti i yego filosofskiy smysl [The concept of efficiency and its philosophical meaning]. Uchenyye zapiski kafedr obshchestvennykh nauk. Filosofskiye i sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Scientific notes of the departments of social sciences. Philosophical and sociological research], 1, 46–54.
Azarnov, N. A., & Kapustin, A. I. (1992). Sotsialnaya psikhologiya voyennogo upravleniya [Social psychology of military command]. Professor N. E. Zhukovsky Air Force Engineering Academy.
Baddeley, A. (2017). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford University Press.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Lee, N. (2017). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience in organizational research: functional and nonfunctional approaches. Organizational Research Methods, 22(1), 299331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117697042
Beszterczey, S., Nestor, P. G., Shirai, A., & Harding, S. (2013). Neuropsychology of decision making and psychopathy in high-risk ex-offenders. Neuropsychology, 27(4), 491–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033162
Blinov, V. M. (1976). Effektivnost obucheniya [Learning efficiency]. Pedagogika. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01007664615
Bush, S. S. (2015). Ethical decision making in clinical neuropsychology. Oxford University Press.
Camerer, C., & Yoon, C. (2015). Introduction to the journal of marketing research special issue on neuroscience and marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 52, 423–426. https://doi.org/10.1509/0022-2437-52.4.423
Dudarev, V. B. (1992). Psikhologicheskiye usloviya effektivnogo ovladeniya ofitserom upravlencheskoy deyatelnostyu [Psychological conditions for effective mastering by an officer of managerial activity] [Unpublished PhD thesis]. The Academy of Armed Forces, Moscow.
Duggan, E. C., Awakon, L. M., Loaiza, C. C., & Garcia-Barrera, M. A. (2019). Contributing towards a cultural neuropsychology assessment decision-making framework: comparison of WAIS-IV Norms from Colombia, Chile, Mexico, Spain, United States, and Canada. Clinical Neuropsychology, 34(5), 657–681. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acy074
Dunker, K. (1981). Struktura i dinamika protsessov resheniya zadach (O protsessakh resheniya prakticheskikh problem) [Structure and dynamics of problem solving processes (On the processes of solving practical problems)]. In Yu. B. Gippenreiter, & V. V. Petukhova (Eds.), Khrestomatiya po obshchey psikhologii. Psikhologiya myshleniya [Reader in General Psychology. Psychology of Thinking] (pp. 258–259). Moscow State University.
Gerasymova, I., Maksymchuk, B., Bilozerova, M., Chernetska, Yu., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., & Maksymchuk, I. (2019). Forming professional mobility in future agricultural specialists: the sociohistorical context. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(4), 345361. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/195
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge University Press.
Karpov, A. V. (1993). Problemy prinyatiya resheniy v trudovoy deyatelnosti [Problems of decision making in labor activity]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 3, 3-14.
Kitov, A. I. (1974). Psikhologiya rukovodstva voinskoy chastyu [The psychology of leadership in a military unit] [Unpublished PhD thesis]. V. I. Lenin Military-Political Academy, Moscow.
Kozeletskiy, Yu. P. (1979). Psikhologicheskaya teoriya resheniy [Psychological decision theory]. Progress.
Kravchenko, A. I. (1999). Sotsiologiya menedzhmenta [Sociology of management]. UNITI.
Ladenko, I. S., & Tulchitskiy, G. P. (1988). Logika tselevogo upravleniya [Target management logic]. Science, Siberian Branch.
Lambert, T. (2001) Klyuchovi problemy kerivnyka: 50 perevirenykh sposobiv vyrishennya problem [Key issues of the head: 50 proven ways to solve problems]. Vsesvit.
Lesechko, M. D., Chemerys, A. O., & Rudnitska, R. M. (2003). Psykholohiya pryynyattya upravlinskykh rishen i stvorennya efektyvnykh komand [Psychology of management decision-making and creating effective teams]. Lviv Regional Institute of Public Administration.
Lomov, B. F. (1984). Metodologicheskiye i teoreticheskiye problemy psikhologii [Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology]. Nauka.
Markov, M. (1982). Tekhnologiya i effektivnost sotsialnogo upravleniya [Technology and efficiency of social management]. Progress.
Maslow, A. (1999). Novyye rubezhi chelovecheskoy prirody [New frontiers of human nature]. Smysl.
Melnyk, N., Bidyuk, N., Kalenskyi, A., Maksymchuk. B., Bakhmat, N., Matviienko, O., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., Golub, N., & Maksymchuk, I. (2019). Modely y orhanyzatsyone osobyne profesyonalne obuke vaspytacha u poјedynym zemљama Evropske Unyјe y u Ukraјyny [Models and organizational characteristics of preschool teachers’ professional training in some EU countries and Ukraine]. Zbornik Instituta za pedagoska istrazivanja, 51(1), 46–93. https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI1901046M
Nerubasska, A., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). The demarkation of creativity, talent and genius in humans: a systemic aspect. Postmodern Openings, 11(2), 240255. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2/172
Piaget, J. (1969). Izbrannyye psikhologicheskiye trudy [Selected psychological works]. Prosveshcheniye.
Platonov, K. K. (1984). Kratkiy slovar sistemy psikhologicheskikh ponyatiy [A brief dictionary of the system of psychological concepts]. Vysshaya shkola. https://www.twirpx.com/file/1687831/
Ponomarev, Ya. A. (1983). Metodologicheskoye vvedeniye v psikhologiyu [Methodological introduction to psychology]. Nauka.
Ross, J. M., Duperrouzel, J., Vega, M., & Gonzalez, R. (2016). The neuropsychology of risky sexual behavior. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 22(6), 586594. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617716000400
Sheremet, M., Leniv, Z., Loboda, V., & Maksymchuk, B. (2019). The development level of smart information criterion for specialists’ readiness for inclusion implementation in education. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 72, 273285. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/11.3/115
Stsiborovskyi, O. A. (2005). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti pryiniattia efektyvnykh rishen ofitseramy DPS Ukrainy v nestandartnykh sytuatsiiakh [Psychological features of effective decision-making in non-standard situations by officers of State Border Guard Service of Ukraine] [Unpublished PhD thesis]. The National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine named after Bohdan Khmelnytskyi.
Vaidya, A. R., & Fellows, L. K. (2017). The neuropsychology of decision-making: a view from the frontal lobes. In J.-C. Dreher, & L. Tremblay (Eds.), Decision Neuroscience. An Integrative Approach (pp. 277-289. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805308-9.00022-1
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs