Who wants to wash away their sins? Guilt and shame proneness and behavioral moral cleansing endorsement: a pilot study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.4/260Keywords:
guilt, shame, moral behavior, moral cleansing, ageAbstract
In our pilot cross-sectional study, we aimed to explore the associations between guilt and shame proneness and moral cleansing endorsement. Our sample consisted of 484 adults (73.3% females), aged 18 and 53 (M=24.09, SD=7.32). We used a novel approach to explore moral cleansing mechanisms, i.e., a two-item scale assessing behavioral cleansing endorsement (one's agreement with the idea that people must "wash away" their immoral acts by acting in ethical ways that would "clean" their moral debt). In addition to the significant associations that we found between moral cleansing endorsement and the guilt and shame proneness dimensions (i.e., negative behavior evaluation, repair action tendencies, negative self-evaluation, and withdrawal action tendencies), results also suggested that moral cleansing endorsement was significantly predicted by overall guilt and shame proneness. More specifically, we found that higher levels of guilt and shame proneness might account for higher moral cleansing endorsement levels. We also found important associations with participants' age: our findings suggested that the higher the age, the higher the endorsement for moral actions aimed to "clean" immoral deeds. Results are discussed in relation to cultural-related factors.
References
Ahmad, M. G., Klotz, A. C., & Bolino, M. C. (2020). Can good followers create unethical leaders? How follower citizenship leads to leader moral licensing and unethical behavior. The Journal of applied psychology, 10.1037/apl0000839. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000839
Arli, D., Leo, C., & Tjiptono, F. (2016). Investigating the impact of guilt and shame proneness on consumer ethics: A cross national study. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(1), 2-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12183
Blanken, I., van de Ven, N., & Zeelenberg, M. (2015). A meta-analytic review of moral licensing. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 540–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215572134
Bocian, K., & Baryla, W. (2020). Pain (less) cleansing: Watching other people in pain reduces guilt and sadness but not shame. Plos one, 15(12), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244429
Borelli, J. L., Nelson, S. K., River, L. M., Birken, S. A., & Moss-Racusin, C. (2017). Gender differences in work-family guilt in parents of young children. Sex Roles, 76(5-6), 356-368. 10.1007/s11199-016-0579-0
Brañas-Garza, P., Bucheli, M., Espinosa, M. P., & García-Muñoz, T. (2013). Moral cleansing and moral licenses: experimental evidence. Economics & Philosophy, 29(2), 199-212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267113000199
Breggin, P. R. (2015). The biological evolution of guilt, shame and anxiety: A new theory of negative legacy emotions. Medical hypotheses, 85(1), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2015.03.015
Burmeister, A., Fasbender, U., & Gerpott, F. H. (2019). Consequences of knowledge hiding: The differential compensatory effects of guilt and shame. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 92(2), 281-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12249
Carpenter, T. P., Tignor, S. M., Tsang, J. A., & Willett, A. (2016). Dispositional self-forgiveness, guilt-and shame-proneness, and the roles of motivational tendencies. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.017
Cougle, J. R., Goetz, A. R., Hawkins, K. A., & Fitch, K. E. (2012). Guilt and compulsive washing: Experimental tests of interrelationships. Cognitive therapy and research, 36(4), 358-366. 10.1007/s10608-011-9359-x
Cohen, T. R., Wolf, S. T., Panter, A. T., & Insko, C. A. (2011). Introducing the GASP scale: A new measure of guilt and shame proneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 947-966. https://doi:10.1037/a0022641
Cui, Y., Errmann, A., Kim, J., Seo, Y., Xu, Y., & Zhao, F. (2020). Moral Effects of Physical Cleansing and Pro-environmental Hotel Choices. Journal of Travel Research, 59(6), 1105-1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287519872821
Dempsey, H. L. (2017). A comparison of the social-adaptive perspective and functionalist perspective on guilt and shame. Behavioral Sciences, 7(4), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7040083
Ding, W., Xie, R., Sun, B., Li, W., Wang, D., & Zhen, R. (2016). Why Does the "Sinner" Act Prosocially? The Mediating Role of Guilt and the Moderating Role of Moral Identity in Motivating Moral Cleansing. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01317
Durkee, P. K., Lukaszewski, A. W., & Buss, D. M. (2019). Pride and shame: Key components of a culturally universal status management system. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(5), 470-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.06.004
Elison, J. (2005). Shame and guilt: A hundred years of apples and oranges. New Ideas in Psychology, 23(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2005.07.001
Engel, J., & Szech, N. (2020). A little good is good enough: Ethical consumption, cheap excuses, and moral self-licensing. PloS one, 15(1), e0227036. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227036
Gilchrist, P. T., & Schnall, S. (2018). The paradox of moral cleansing: When physical cleansing leads to increased contamination concerns. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 61, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.06.002
Gilchrist, J. D., Solomon-Krakus, S., Pila, E., Crocker, P., & Sabiston, C. M. (2020). Associations between Physical Self-Concept and Anticipated Guilt and Shame: The Moderating Role of Gender. Sex Roles, 763-772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01137-x
Gneezy, U., Imas, A., & Madarász, K. (2014). Conscience Accounting: Emotion Dynamics and Social Behavior. Management Science, 60(11), 2645-2658. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1942.
Grey, I., Daly, R., Thomas, J., & Marassas, W. (2018). The relationship between shame and guilt: Cultural comparisons between Ireland and the United Arab Emirates. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 21(3), 221-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2018.1455651
Harkrider, L. N., Tamborski, M. A., Wang, X., Brown, R. P., Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., & Devenport, L. D. (2013). Threats to Moral Identity: Testing the Effects of Incentives and Consequences of One's Actions on Moral Cleansing. Ethics & Behavior, 23(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2012.714246
Ilies, R., Peng, A. C., Savani, K., & Dimotakis, N. (2013). Guilty and helpful: An emotion-based reparatory model of voluntary work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034162
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., Gilovich, T., & Ariely, D. (2013). Moral masochism: On the connection between guilt and self-punishment. Emotion, 13(1), 14. 10.1037/a0029749
Jaffe, K. (2008). Evolution of shame as an adaptation to social punishment and its contribution to social cohesiveness. Complexity, 14(2), 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.20244
Loi, T. I., Kuhn, K. M., Sahaym, A., Butterfield, K. D., & Tripp, T. M. (2020). From helping hands to harmful acts: When and how employee volunteering promotes workplace deviance. The Journal of applied psychology, 105(9), 944–958. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000477
Meub, L., Proeger, T., Schneider, T., & Bizer, K. (2016). The victim matters–experimental evidence on lying, moral costs and moral cleansing. Applied Economics Letters, 23(16), 1162-1167. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2016.1139674
Monin, B., & Miller, D. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.81.1.33
Mullen, E., & Monin, B. (2016). Consistency Versus Licensing Effects of Past Moral Behavior. Annual review of psychology, 67, 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115120
Nisan, M., & Horenczyk, G. (1990). Moral balance: The effect of prior behaviour on decision in moral conflict. British journal of social psychology, 29(1), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00884.x
O'Connor, K., Effron, D. A., & Lucas, B. J. (2020). Moral cleansing as hypocrisy: When private acts of charity make you feel better than you deserve. Journal of personality and social psychology, 10, 1037/pspa0000195. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000195
Onwezen, M. C., Bartels, J., & Antonides, G. (2014). Environmentally friendly consumer choices: Cultural differences in the self-regulatory function of anticipated pride and guilt. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.07.003
Orth, U., Berking, M., & Burkhardt, S. (2006). Self-conscious emotions and depression: Rumination explains why shame but not guilt is maladaptive. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 32(12), 1608-1619. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206292958
Rotella, A., & Barclay, P. (2020). Failure to replicate moral licensing and moral cleansing in an online experiment. Personality and Individual Differences, 161, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109967
Sachdeva, S., Iliev, R., Medin, D. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological Science. 20(4) 523-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02326.x
Shen, L. (2018). The evolution of shame and guilt. PloS one, 13(7), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199448
Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3), 591–611. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2333709
Sunar, D., Cesur, S., Piyale, Z. E., Tepe, B., Biten, A. F., Hill, C. T., & Koç, Y. (2020). People respond with different moral emotions to violations in different relational models: A cross-cultural comparison. Emotion. 10.1037/emo0000736
Sznycer, D., Xygalatas, D., Agey, E., Alami, S., An, X. F., Ananyeva, K. I., Atkinson, Q. D., Broitman, B. R., Conte, T. J., Flores, C., Fukushima, S., Hitokoto, H., Kharitonov, A. N., Onyishi, I. E., Romero, P. P., Schrock, J. M., Snodgrass, J. J., Sugiyama, L. S., Takemura, K., Townsend, C., Zhuang, J. Y., Aktipis, C. A., Cronk, L., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2018). Cross-cultural invariances in the architecture of shame. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(39), 9702-9707.
Tilghman-Osborne, C., Cole, D. A., & Felton, J. W. (2010). Definition and measurement of guilt: Implications for clinical research and practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(5), 536-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.007
Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2004). " Putting the Self Into Self-Conscious Emotions: A Theoretical Model". Psychological Inquiry, 15(2), 103-125. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1502_01
Watson, S. D., Gomez, R., & Gullone, E. (2016). The shame and guilt scales of the test of self-conscious affect-adolescent (TOSCA-A): psychometric properties for responses from children, and measurement invariance across children and adolescents. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 635. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00635
West, C., & Zhong, C. B. (2015). Moral cleansing. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 221-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.022
Zhang, H., Chen, S., Wang, R., Jiang, J., Xu, Y., & Zhao, H. (2017). How upward moral comparison influences prosocial behavioral intention: Examining the mediating role of guilt and the moderating role of moral identity. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01554
Zhong, C. B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science (New York, N.Y.), 313(5792), 1451–1452. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130726
Zhu, R., Feng, C., Zhang, S., Mai, X., & Liu, C. (2019). Differentiating guilt and shame in an interpersonal context with univariate activation and multivariate pattern analyses. NeuroImage, 186, 476-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.012
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
