Conspiracy Belief and Behavior in the COVID-19 Pandemic
How Belief in Conspiracy Theory Relates to Adherence to Quarantine Restrictions (Wearing Protective Equipment, Isolation, Hygiene) and Influences Antisocial Behavior such as Aggression and Selfishness, as well as Prosocial Behavior such as Help and Altruism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.2/200Keywords:
Belief in conspiracy, quarantine behavior, antisocial behavior, pro-social behaviorAbstract
This research was aimed at investigating the relationship between belief in conspiracy theory and personality behaviors in quarantine. Belief in conspiracy theory has been hypothesized to predict the degree of adherence to quarantine restrictions (wearing protective equipment, isolation, hygiene) and influences antisocial behavior such as aggression and selfishness, as well as prosocial behavior such as help and altruism. The obtained data of the empirical research indicate the absence of functional connections that could demonstrate the defining role of conspiracy mindset in the manifestations of prosocial and asocial behavior; however, there is still a statistical consistency of changes in indicators.
Also, preventive behavior was practically not associated with the personality's conspiracy beliefs about COVID-19 (the regression equation explains less than 1% of the variance). It is emphasized that the data obtained contradict the results of some previous researches, which are devoted to the research of the behavioral consequences of conspiracy mindset and adherence to preventive measures in a pandemic, in particular.
References
Abalakina-Paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T., & Gregory, W. L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20(3), 637–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00160
Alper, S., Bayrak, F., & Yilmaz, O. (2020). Psychological correlates of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and preventive measures: Evidence from Turkey. Current Psychology 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00903-0
Banai, I. P., Banai, B., & Mikloušić, I. (2020). Beliefs in COVID-19 conspiracy theories predict lower level of compliance with the preventive measures both directly and indirectly by lowering trust in government medical officials. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/yevq7
Bilewicz, M., Winiewski, M., Kofta, M., & Wójcik, A. (2013). Harmful ideas, the structure and consequences of anti-Semitic beliefs in Poland. Political Psychology, 34(6), 821–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12024
Bogart, L. M., & Thorburn, S. (2005). Are HIV/AIDS Conspiracy Beliefs a Barrier to HIV Prevention Among African Americans? Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 38(2), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1097/00126334-200502010-00014
Cichocka, A., Marchlewska, M., & Golec de Zavala, A. (2016). Does self-love or self-hate predict conspiracy beliefs? Narcissism, self-esteem, and the endorsement of conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615616170
Darwin, H., Neave, N., & Holmes, J. (2011). Belief in conspiracy theories. The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1289–1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.027
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories. Current directions in psychological science, 26(6), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261
Einstein, K. L. & Glick, D. M. (2015). Do I think BLS data are BS? The consequences of conspiracy theories. Political Behavior, 37(3), 679–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-014-9287-z
Fetiskin, N., Kozlov, V., Manuilov, G. (2002). Diagnostika lichnostnoy ustanovki “al'truizm – egoizm” [Diagnostics of the personal attitude “altruism - egoism”]. Socio-psychological diagnostics of the development of personality and small groups. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Psikhoterapii. 23–24. [in Russian]
Franks, B., Bangerter, A., Bauer, M.W., Hall, M. & Noort, M.C. (2017). Beyond “monologicality”? Exploring conspiracist worldviews. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 861. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00861
Gaston, G. B & Alleyne-Green, B. (2013). The impact of African Americans' beliefs about HIV medical care on treatment adherence: a systematic review and recommendations for interventions. AIDS Behav 17(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-012-0323-x
Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15(4), 731–742. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791630
Golec de Zavala, A., Cichocka, A., & Iskra-Golec, I. (2013). Collective narcissism moderates the effect of in-group image threat on intergroup hostility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(6), 1019–1039. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032215
Goreis, A., & Voracek, M. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological research on conspiracy beliefs: Field characteristics, measurement instruments, and associations with personality traits. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 205. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00205
Grzesiak-Feldman, M. (2015). Are the high authoritarians more prone to adopt conspiracy theories? The role of right-wing authoritarianism in conspiratorial thinking. In M. Bilewicz, A. Cichocka, & W. Soral (Eds.), The psychology of conspiracy (p. 99–121). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Imhoff, R., & Lamberty, P. (2018). How paranoid are conspiracy believers? Toward a more fine-grained understanding of the connect and disconnect between paranoia and belief in conspiracy theories. European journal of social psychology, 48(7), 909–926. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2494
Imhoff, R., Lamberty, P., Klein, O. (2018). Using power as a negative cue: How conspiracy mentality affects epistemic trust in sources of historical knowledge. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 1364–1379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218768779
Imhoff, R., Dieterle, L., Lamberty, P. (2020). Resolving the puzzle of conspiracy worldview and political activism: Belief in secret plots decreases normative but increases nonnormative political engagement. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619896491.
Jolley, D., Douglas, K. M. (2014). The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one’s carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12018
Jolley, D., Douglas, K. M., Leite, A. C., Schrader, T. (2019). Belief in conspiracy theories and intentions to engage in everyday crime. British Journal of Social Psychology 58(3), 534-549 https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12311
Khvan, A. A., Zaitsev, Yu.A., Kuznetsova, Yu. A. (2008). Opyt standartizatsii oprosnika izmereniya agressivnykh i vrazhdebnykh reaktsiy A. Bassa i A. Darki [Experience of standardization of the questionnaire for measuring aggressive and hostile reactions A. Bass and A. Darki]. Psychological diagnostics, 1, 54–58.
Klofstad, C.A., Uscinski, J.E., Connolly, J.M. et al. (2019). What drives people to believe in Zika conspiracy theories? Palgrave Commun, 5, 36. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0243-8
Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Vaughan, S. (2013). The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE1720
Marinthe, G., Brown, G., Delouvée, S. & Jolley, D. (2020). Looking out for myself: Exploring the relationship between conspiracy mentality, perceived personal risk, and COVID-19 prevention measures. Health Psychology, 25(4), 957–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12449
Nartova-Bochaver, S.K. (1992). Eksperimental'noye issledovaniye situatsionnoy izmenchivosti motivatsii pomoshchi [An experimental study of the situational variability of motivation for help]. Psychological Journal, 13 (4), 15-23.
Oliver, J. E., & Wood, T. J. (2014). Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion. American journal of political science, 58 (4), 952–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084
Parsons, S., Simmons, W., Shinhoster, F., & Kilburn, J. (1999). A test of the grapevine: An empirical examination of conspiracy theories among African Americans. Sociological Spectrum, 19(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/027321799280235
Plohl, N., & Musil, B. (2020). Modeling compliance with covid-19 prevention guidelines: The critical role of trust in science. Psychology, Health & Medicine. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1772988
Swami, V. (2012). Social psychological origins of conspiracy theories: The case of the Jewish conspiracy theory in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00280
Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., & Furnham, A. (2014). Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition, 133, 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006
Twenge, J., Baumeister, R., DeWall C. N., Ciarocco, N. J. & Bartels J.M. (2007). Social Exclusion Decreases Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.56
Uscinski, J. E., Parent, J. M. (2014). American Conspiracy Theories. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199351800.001.0001
Van der Linden, SL. (2015). The conspiracy-effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance. Personality and Individual Differences 87, 171–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.045
Van Prooijen, J.-W., & Jostmann, N. B. (2013). Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(1), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1922
Van Prooijen, J.-W. (2016). Sometimes inclusion breeds suspicion: Self-uncertainty and belongingness predict belief in conspiracy theories. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2157
Van Prooijen, J.-W., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(7), 897–908. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2530
Van Prooijen, J. -W. Bilewicz, M., Witkowska, M., Pantazi, M., Gkinopoulos, Th. & Klein, O. (2019). Traumatic Rift: How Conspiracy Beliefs Undermine Cohesion After Societal Trauma? European Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1699
Watson, P. J. & Morris, R. J. (1991). Narcissism, empathy and social desirability. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(6), 575–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90253-8
Whitson, J. A. & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking Control Increases Illusory Pattern Perception. Science 322(5898):115–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1159845
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
