Developing Independent Creativity in Pupils: Neuroscientific Discourse and Ukraine’s Experience

Authors

  • Tetiana Berbets Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University
  • Vitalii Berbets Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University
  • Inna Babii Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University
  • Olga Chyrva Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University
  • Andrii Malykhin Berdyansk State Pedagogical University
  • Liliia Sushentseva Lviv Polytechnic National University
  • Serhii MEDYNSKII Serhii Medynskyi Bogdan Khmelnitsky Melitopol State Pedagogical University
  • Olha Riaboshapka Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University
  • Tetiana Matviichuk Lviv State University of Physical Culture
  • Valeriy Solovyov Lviv State University of Physical Culture
  • Iryna Maksymchuk Mariupol State University
  • Borys Maksymchuk Izmail State University of Humanities

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.4/252

Keywords:

educational and handicraft activities, technological training, situations of success, workbook, game technologies

Abstract

The article deals with the process of updating the content and methods of technological training. The latter aims to form pupils’ skills of independent creativity and educational and handicraft activities, which act as the means of improving education quality. The international relevance of the article lies in the objectification of Ukraine’s experience, which can be used in the post-Soviet countries, given that these countries follow conservative principles in planning and implementing educational content. The article proves that the effectiveness of developing pupils’ experience of independent creativity during handicraft and technology lessons is determined by the following organizational and methodological conditions: comprehending the need for independent creativity; developing pupils’ positive motivation towards independent creative handicraft and technology activities; improving educational and methodological support; using innovative pedagogical technologies and information and communication technologies. The article summarizes research findings of certain Ukrainian and foreign researchers, which adds up to the generalized contribution of its authors.

References

Aleksiuk, A. M., & Kashin, S. O. (1986). Udoskonalennya navchalnoho protsesu v seredniy shkoli [Enhancing the educational process in secondary school]. Kyiv: Higher Education. http://irb.nubip.edu.ua/cgi-bin/irbis64r_14/cgiirbis_64.exe?LNG=uk&C21COM=S&I21DBN=NUBIP&P21DBN=NUBIP&S21FMT=briefwebr&S21ALL=%3C.%3EK%3D%D0%A8%D0%9A%D0%9E%D0%9B%D0%86$%3C.%3E&Z21ID=&S21SRW=GOD&S21SRD=UP&S21STN=1&S21REF=10&S21CNR=10

Buriak, V. (2007). Systema dydaktychnykh umov efektyvnosti orhanizatsiyi navchalnoyi piznavalnoyi diyalnosti [The system of didactic conditions for the effectiveness of educational cognitive activities organization]. Ridna shkola [Native School], 5, 25–27. http://catalog.library.tnpu.edu.ua:8080/library/DocDescription?doc_id=279628

Della Sala, S., & Anderson, M. (2012). Neuroscience in education: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199600496.001.0001/acprof-9780199600496

Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1011–1026. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196731

Erganova, N. Ye. (2007). Metodika professionalnogo obucheniya [Vocational training methodology]. Moscow: Academy. https://www.studmed.ru/erganova-ne-metodika-professionalnogo-obucheniya_49aa3286f87.html

Galperin, P. Ya., & Talyzina, N. F. (1992). Upravleniye poznavatelnoy deyatelnostyu uchashchikhsya [Managing cognitive activity of pupils]. Moscow: Pedagogy. https://www.libex.ru/detail/book571411.html

Gearin, B. M., & Fien, H. (2016). Translating the neuroscience of physical activity to education. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 5(1), 1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2016.02.001

Gruart, A. (2014). The role of neurosciences in education... and vice versa. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 3(1), 2148. http://dx.doi.org/10.4471/ijep.2014.02

Kobernyk, O. M. (1998). Navchalno-vykhovnyy protses u silskiy zahalnoosvitniy shkoli: sutnist, proektuvannya, orhanizatsiya [The educational process in rural comprehensive school: concept, design, organization]. Kyiv: Knowledge. http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?Z21ID=&I21DBN=REF&P21DBN=REF&S21STN=1&S21REF=10&S21FMT=fullwebr&C21COM=S&S21CNR=20&S21P01=0&S21P02=0&S21P03=A=&S21COLORTERMS=1&S21STR=%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%20%D0%9E$

Komogorova, M., Maksymchuk, B., Bernatska, O., Lukianchuk, S., Gerasymova, I., Popova, O., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., Kalashnik, N., Davydenko, H., Stoliarenko, O., Stoliarenko, O., & Maksymchuk, I. (2021). Pedagogical Consolidation of Pupil-Athletes? Knowledge of Humanities. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.1/367

Li, L., Gow, A. D. I., & Zhou, J. (2018). The role of positive emotions in education: a neuroscience perspective. Mind, Brain, and Education, 14(3), 220234. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12244

Lindell, A. K., & Kidd, E. (2011). Why right‐brain teaching is half‐witted: a critique of the misapplication of neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 5(3), 121127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01120.x

Maksymchuk, B., Gurevych, R., Matviichuk, T., Surovov, O., Stepanchenko, N., Opushko, N., Sitovskyi, A., Kosynskyi, E., Bogdanyuk, A., Vakoliuk, A., Solovyov, V., & Maksymchuk, I. (2020a). Training Future Teachers to Organize School Sport. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(4), 310-327. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.4/347

Maksymchuk, B., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., Davydenko, H., Soichuk, R., Khurtenko, O., Groshovenko, O., Stepanchenko, N., Andriychuk, Y., Grygorenko, T., Duka, T., Pidlypniak, I., Gurevych, R., Kuzmenko, V., & Maksymchuk, I. (2020b). Developing Healthcare Competency in Future Teachers. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(3), 24-43. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/307

Onishchuk, I., Ikonnikova, M., Antonenko, T., Kharchenko, I., Shestakova, S., Kuzmenko, N., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). Characteristics of Foreign Language Education in Foreign Countries and Ways of Applying Foreign Experience in Pedagogical Universities of Ukraine. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(3), 44-65. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/308

Onyshchuk, V. A. (1981). Urok v sovremennoy shkole [The lesson in a modern school]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie. https://www.twirpx.com/file/437434/

Palamarchuk, O., Gurevych, R., Maksymchuk, B., Gerasymova, I., Fushtey, O., Logutina, N., Kalashnik, N., Kylivnyk, A., Haba, I., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., & Maksymchuk, I. (2020). Studying Innovation as the Factor in Professional Self-Development of Specialists in Physical Education and Sport. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(4), 118-136. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.4/337

Savchenko, O. Ya. (2007). Theoretical approaches to defining the quality of school education. Pedahohika i psykholohiya [Pedagogy and Psychology], 2, 26–34. https://scholar.google.com.ua/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0,5&cluster=454898424665960140

Serhiienko, N. (2010). Orhanizatsiyno-metodychni umovy rozvytku profesiynoyi kompetentnosti vchyteliv zahalnoosvitnikh navchalnykh zakladiv [Organizational and methodological conditions for developing professional competency in comprehensive schoolteachers]. Teoriya ta metodyka upravlinnya osvitoyu [Theory and Methodology of Education Management], 3, 23–26. http://tme.umo.edu.ua/docs/3/10sereet.pdf

Shchukina, G. I. (1988). Pedagogicheskiye problemy formirovaniya poznavatelnykh interesov uchashchikhsya [Pedagogical problems of forming cognitive interests in pupils]. Moscow: Pedagogy. http://lib.mgppu.ru/opacunicode/app/webroot/index.php?url=/notices/index/IdNotice:16790/Source:default

Sheremet M., Leniv Z., Loboda V., Maksymchuk B. (2019) The development level of smart information criterion for specialists’ readiness for inclusion implementation in education. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 72, 273-285. https://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index.php/itlt/article/view/2561

Usova, A. V. (2000). Chtoby ucheniye stalo interesnym i uspeshnym [Making teaching interesting and effective]. Pedagogika [Pedagogy], 4, 30–33. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9268402

Downloads

Published

2021-12-20

How to Cite

Berbets, T., Berbets, V., Babii, I., Chyrva, O., Malykhin, A., Sushentseva, L., MEDYNSKII, S., Riaboshapka, O., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., Maksymchuk, I., & Maksymchuk, B. (2021). Developing Independent Creativity in Pupils: Neuroscientific Discourse and Ukraine’s Experience. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 12(4), 314-328. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.4/252

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now