Anti-mobbing Technology in the Conditions of an Educational Institution in Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.3/235Keywords:
Educational institution, head, mobbing, pedagogical management, pedagogical workersAbstract
The article reveals the essence of the concept "mobbing" and its classification in the context of pedagogical management. An empirical study has been conducted to identify the presence, frequency, causes, features of manifestations and consequences of mobbing processes in the teaching staff of general secondary education in Ukraine. Methods of randomized experiment, correlation analysis, scaling and ranking were used to process the research results. The results of the correlation analysis revealed causal relationships between some causes, manifestations, consequences of mobbing and certain statistical characteristics. The results of the empirical study prove the presence and prevalence of cases of mobbing in the teaching staff of secondary schools in Ukraine. The results of the study allow us to conclude that in general secondary education institutions, depending on the status of the persons involved, all three types of mobbing are implemented. Vertical prevails - 41.5%. Horizontal - 27.7% of respondents, mixed - 11.8%. 19% of respondents did not face mobbing. Depending on the specifics of harassment, there are different variations of mobbing processes, which sometimes overlap in their manifestations. Bosing prevails - 41.5%. 27.7% indicated bullying, social isolation - 15.8%, staffing - 14.7%, sandwich mobbing - 11.8%, gaslighting - 8.4%, outing - 7.7%, ageism - 6.8%, stalking - 5.9%, cyber mobbing - 4.7%. Also, based on the results of the survey, we can conclude that in educational institutions there are manifestations of obstruction - 3.1% of respondents. The general bases of anti-mobbing technology have been developed - a system of measures of the head and pedagogical workers to prevent, detect and combat harassment, moral pressure, psychological terror in an educational institution.
References
Adamchuk, O. V. (2014). Porady kerivnyku shchodo poperedzhennia ta podolannia mobinhu sered pidlehlykh [Tips for the leader to prevent and overcome mobbing among subordinates]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii Derzhavnoi prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy [Bulletin of the National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine], 2. https://kipt.sumdu.edu.ua/pdf/buling/Vnadps_2014_2_15.pdf
Aliushyna, N. O. (2019). Doslidzhennia proiaviv tskuvannia na derzhavnii sluzhbi [Efficiency of Public Administration], Efektyvnist derzhavnoho upravlinnia [Effectiveness of sovereign management], 2(59), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.33990/2070-4011.59.2019.178431
Al-Shafaee, M., Al-Kaabi, Y., Al-Farsi, Y., White, G., Al-Maniri, A., & Al-Sinawi, H. (2013). Pilot study on the prevalence of abuse and mistreatment during clinical internship: a cross-sectional study among first year residents in Oman. BMJ Open, 3(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002076
Chappell, D., & Martino, V. Di (2006). Violence at work (third edition). Geneva, International Labour Office. http://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/2006/106B09_110_engl.pdf
Duffy M., & Sperry L. (2013). Overcoming Mobbing: A Recovery Guide for Workplace Aggression and Bullying. Oxford University Press.
Dziuba, T. M. (2017). Profesiine zdorovia yak umova uspishnoi sotsializatsii pratsivnyka v sytuatsii mobinhu [Professional health as a condition for successful socialization of a worker in a mobbing situation]. Orhanizatsiina psykholohiia. Ekonomichna psykholohiia [Organizational psychology. Economic psychology], 1, 7-13. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ophep_2017_1_3
Kachmar, O. V. (2016). Mobinh yak riznovyd psykholohichnoho nasylstva u trudovomu kolektyvi [Mobbing as a kind of psychological violence in the workforce]. Aktualni problemy filosofii ta sotsiolohii [Current issues of philosophy and sociology], 14, 58-61. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/aprfc_2016_14_16
Kolodej, C. (2005). Mobbing. Psychoterror am Arbeitsplatz und seine Bewältigung. Mit zahlreichen Fallbeispielen [Mobbing. Psychological terror in the workplace and coping with it. With numerous case studies]. Vienna, WUV-Verlag (in German]).
Leshchuk, H. (2016). Sotsialni aspekty proiaviv mobinhu u profesiinomu seredovysh [Social aspects of mobbing manifestations in a professional environment]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pedahohika. Sotsialna robota [Scientific herald of the Uzhhorod National University. Series: Pedagogy. Social work], 1, 165-167. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nvuuped_2016_1_41
Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 165–184. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414853
Lorents, K. (1994). Agressiya (tak nazyivaemoe «zlo») [Aggression (so-called «evil»)]. Izdatelskaya gruppa «Progress».
Macassa, G., Viitasara, E., Sundin, O., Barros, H., Torres Gonzales, F., Ioannidi-Kapolou, E., Gabriella, M. M., Lindert, J., Stankunas, M., & Soares, J. J. F. (2013). Psychological abuse among older persons in Europe: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 5(1), 16-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/17596591311290722
Marenych, A. I., &Vovk, Yu. A. (2015). Destruktyvni elementy sotsialno-psykholohichnykh aspektiv upravlinnia personalom [Destructive elements of socio-psychological aspects of personnel management]. Visnyk Universytetu bankivskoi spravy [Bulletin of the University of Banking], 2, 230-238. https://doi.org/10.18371/2221-755x2(23)201569857
Namie, G. (2014). WBI U.S. Workplace Bullying Survey. https://icos.umich.edu/sites/default/files/lecturereadinglists/WBI-2014-US-Survey.print_.pdf
Ogunsemi, O. O., Alebiosu, O. C., & Shorunmu, O. T. (2010). A survey of perceived stress, intimidation, harassment and well-being of resident doctors in a Nigerian teaching hospital. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 13(2), 183-186. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/njcp/article/view/53502/42071
Olweus, D. (2002). Mobbing I skolen: Nye data om omfang og forandring over tid [Mobbing in school: New data on scope and change over time]. Research Centre for Health Promotion (HEMIL Center). Bergen, Norway.
Oros, O. B. (2020). Mobinh v osvitnomu seredovyshchi [Mobbing in the educational environment]. Habitus, 11, 78-82. https://doi.org/10.32843/2663-5208.2020.11.13
Rekosh, K. H. (2002). Mobbing i problema ego preodoleniya vo Frantsii [Mobbing and the problem of overcoming it in France]. Trud za rubezhom [Labor abroad], 2, 97-105. https://mgimo.ru/library/publications/108019/
Serdiuk, O.I., & Shupta, I.M. (2013). Mobinh yak destruktyvne yavyshche v kreatyvnomu kolektyvi, shcho halmuie innovatsiinyi rozvytok pidpryiemstva [Mobbing as a destructive phenomenon in the creative team that inhibits the innovative development of the enterprise]. Naukovi pratsi derzhavnoi ahrarnoi akademii. [Scientific works of State Agrarian Academy], 1(6), 2. http://www.pdaa.edu.ua/sites/default/files/nppdaa/6.2/269.pdf
Serhiienko, T. I. (2012). Konflikty v kolektyvi i rol kerivnyka u yikh vyrishenni [Conflicts in the team and the role of the leader in their solution]. Humanitarnyi visnyk ZDIA [Humanitarian Bulletin of ZDIA], 48, 236-242. https://old-zdia.znu.edu.ua/gazeta/VISNIK_48_236.pdf
Shchetinina, L.V., Rudakova, S. H., & Drobynska, K. O. (2018). Mobinh: sutnist ta instytutsiini zasady zakhystu pratsivnykiv [Mobing: essence and institutional principles of protection of workers]. Problemy ekonomiky [Problems of economy], 1, 315–320. https://ir.kneu.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/2010/26099/Schetinina_315.pdf?sequence=1&isllowed=y
Smuk, O. T. (2018). Mobinh yak naslidok zloiakisnoi ahresii [Mobing as a consequence of malignant aggression]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pedahohika. Sotsialna robota [Scientific herald of the Uzhhorod National University. Series: Pedagogy. Social work], 2, 260-264. https://doi.org/10.24144/25240609.2018.43.260-264
Soroka, O. V. (2013). Sutnist, naslidki ta profi laktika mobingu u trudovih kolektivah [Essence, aftermath and prevention of mobbing in the workforce]. Modern Directions Of Theoretical And Applied Researches, 1(32), 32-38. https://www.sworld.com.ua/konfer30/1051.pdf
Waniorek, L., & Waniorek, A. (1994). Mobbing: Wenn der Arbeitsplatz zur Holle wird [Mobing: When the workplace turns into hell]. Muenchen, Mvg-Verlag.
Yelgecen-Tigrel, E., & Kokalan, O. (2009). Academic mobbing in Turkey. World Acedemy of Engineering, Science and Technology, 55, 963–971. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.190.4904&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Zapf, D. (1999). Organisational, work group related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 70-85. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437729910268669
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
