Behavioral Intervention Technologies – Historical, Medical, Philosophical, and Ethical Perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/13.1/294Keywords:
behavior, genetic selection, genetic intervention, ethical challengesAbstract
In this study, we will analyze, from philosophical, medical and bioethical points of view, the genetic ways in which the biological foundations of human behavior can be identified, as well as the technologies that can contribute to the modification of certain human behaviors, especially aggressive ones.
Ideas about the inheritance of a certain behavior have been identified since Greek antiquity, but in the 20th century, along with sequencing and mapping of all genes of the members of our species, the possibility of identifying possible genes for learning and memory has emerged and therefore the ability to act on them through “behavioral genetics” could develop. In the dawn of the 21st century, researchers begin to consider that abnormal behaviors had a certain genetic mutation located on the “X” chromosome or on the “Y” chromosome and the concept of “genetics of intellectual disability” was introduced in the medical literature. After the identification of the genes or the constellation of genes that underlie the occurrence of psychiatric disorders, the researchers developed genetic engineering to be performed on certain groups of neuronal cells, but these activities lead to the question: how useful or dangerous these new genome editing technologies will be, especially in terms of conservation and perpetuation of the human species.
We conclude that the chimera-type people, whose genetic structure is artificially constructed, would raise issues primarily about their identity, their integration into traditional societies, but also about the need for a new legislation. However, the future society will have, at some point, to accept the reality of genetic interventions, the purpose of which is to achieve much more radical transformations in human nature.
References
Anagnostopoulos, A. V., Mobraaten, L. E., Sharp, J. J., & Davisson, M. T. (2001a). Transgenic and knockout databases: behavioral profiles of mouse mutants. Physiology and Behavior, 73(5), 675-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9384(01)00525-x
Anagnostopoulos, A. V., Sharp, J. J., Mobraaten, L. E., Eppig, J. T., & Davisson, M. T. (2001b). Availability and characterization of transgenic and knockout mice with behavioral manifestations: where to look and what to search for. Behavioural brain research, 125(1- 2), 33-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00284-4
Brunner, H. G., Nelen, M. R., van Zandvoort, P., Abeling, N. G., van Gennip, A. H., Wolters, E. C., Kuiper, M. A., Ropers, H. H., & van Oost. B. A. (1993a). X-linked borderline mental retardation with prominent behavioral disturbance: phenotype, genetic localization, and evidence for disturbed monoamine metabolism. American Journal of Human Genetics, 52(6), 1032-1039.
Brunner, H. G., Nelen, M., Breakefield, X. O., Ropers, H. H., & van Oost B. A. (1993b). Abnormal behavior associated with a point mutation in the structural gene for monoamine oxidase A. Science, 262(5133), 578-580. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8211186
Bull, C., & Varghese, F. P. (2020). Human Genome Project and Personality. In B. J. Carducci & C. S. Nave (Eds.), The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, Volume I. Models and Theories. Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119547167.ch137
Burgess, A. (1962). A Clockwork Orange. Heinemann.
Feng, G., Jensen, F. E., Greely, H. T., Okano, H., Treue, S., Roberts, A. C., Fox, J. G., Caddick, S., Poo, M., Newsome, W. T., & Morrison, J. H. (2020). Opportunities and limitations of genetically modified nonhuman primate models for neuroscience research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(39), 24022-24031. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006515117
Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Goddard, H. H. (1912). The Kallikak Family: A Study of the Heredity of Feeble-Mindedness. Preface. Macmillan Company.
Grote, G. (1867). Plato and the other Companions of Socrates. Platonic Republic, Volume III (2nd ed.). John Murray.
Heidenreich, M., & Zhang, F. (2016). Applications of CRISPR-Cas systems in neuroscience. Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 17(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2015.2
Herrnstein, R., & Murry, C. (1994). The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. Free Press.
Lowenstein, P., & Castro, M. G. (2001). Genetic engineering within the adult brain: Implications for molecular approaches to behavioral neuroscience. Physiology & Behavior, 73(5), 833-839. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9384(01)00520-0
Maximilian, C., Bembea, M., & Belengeanu, V. (2001). Genetica început fără sfârșit. Editura de Vest.
Mayford, M., Bach, M. E., Huang, Y.-Y., Wang, L., Hawkins, R. D., & Kandel, E. R. (1996). Control of Memory Formation Through Regulated Expression of a CaMKII Transgene. Science, 274 (5293), 1678-1683. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5293.1678
Ojovanu, V. (2020). News and perspectives of the implementation of the potential of bioethics in the socio-medical space. In V. Ojovanu (Ed.), Health, Medicine and Bioethics in the current society: inter and multidisciplinary studies. Print-Caro.
Plato. (2008). The Republic (B. Jowett, Trans.). Digireads.com.
Plato. (2001). Symposium (B. Seth Trans.). The University of Chicago Press.
Romanis, E. C. (2018). Artificial womb technology and the frontiers of human reproduction: conceptual differences and potential implications. Journal of Medical Ethics, 0, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-1049110
Romanis E. C. (2020). Artificial womb technology and clinical translation: Innovative treatment or medical research?. Bioethics, 34(4), 392–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12701
Ropers, H. H. (2008). Genetics of intellectual disability, Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, 18 (3), 241-50.
Roushan, T., Ahmed, D., & Ali, M. R. (2014). Human Genome Project- A Review. Medicine Today, 26 (01), 53-55.
Sandu. A. (2020). Bioetica în criză sau criza bioeticii? O filosofie a pandemiei în societatea medicalizată. Editura Lumen.
Segers, S. (2021). The path toward ectogenesis: looking beyond the technical challenges. BMC Medical Ethics, 22, 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00630-6
Shakespeare, W. (1894). All's Well that Ends Well, Act I: 1. In W. A. Wright (Ed.), The Works of William Shakespeare, Volume XII. Macmillan and Co.
Tsien, J. Z. (1998). Behavioral genetics: subregion- and cell type-restricted gene knockout in mouse brain. Pathologie Biologie (Paris), 46(9), 699-700.
Tsien, J. Z., Chen, D. F., Gerber, D., Tom, C., Mercer, E. H., Anderson, D. J., Mayford, M., Kandel, E. R., & Tonegawa, S. (1996). Subregion- and Cell Type – Restricted Gene Knockout in Mouse Brain. Cell, 87(7), 1317-1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81826-7
von Goethe, J. W. (2014). Faust: A Tragedy, Parts One and Two, Fully Revised Faust (M. Greenberg, Trans.). Yale University Press.
Watson, H. J., Yilmaz, Z., & Sullivan, P. F. (2020). The Psychiatric Genomics Consortium: History, development, and the future. In B. T. Baune (Ed.), Personalized Psychiatry (pp. 91-101). Academic Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND