A Preliminary Investigation of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Early Childhood Education and Care


  • Dana Rad Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6754-3585
  • Anca Egerau Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Romania
  • Alina Roman Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Romania
  • Tiberiu Dughi Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Romania
  • Evelina Balas Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Romania
  • Roxana Maier Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Romania
  • Sonia Ignat Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Romania
  • Gavril Rad Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Romania




Technology Acceptance Model, Early Childhood Education and Care, scale reliability


The technology acceptance model (TAM) is a well-known postmodern idea that explains how humans adopt and use new technologies. The model focuses on variables that impact behavioral intention to use new technology from the perspective of the end user. The purpose of this study was to construct a viable questionnaire for assessing preschool teachers' technology acceptability in online instruction in ECEC, based on data collected from 182 Romanian preschool instructors, using the theory of planned behavior framework. Our application of theory of planned behavior in technology adoption in ECEC is extraordinarily good, with 66 percent explained variance of actual usage of technology in class. The research literature supports the findings that the intention to use technology and a good attitude toward technology are the most significant determinants of actual technology usage. Although more research is needed in larger and more complex samples to confirm these findings, there is compelling evidence that the prediction methodology can be used to predict preschool teachers' level of technology acceptance and assist educational decision-makers in designing timely interventions that improve the chances of success. The study's major findings point to crucial variables that might help national educational decision-makers improve technology adoption in ECEC.

Author Biographies

Dana Rad, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad

Assoc.Prof. PhD, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Psychology and Social Sciences, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Romania

Anca Egerau, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Romania

Assoc. Prof. PhD, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Arad, Romania

Alina Roman, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Romania

Prof. PhD, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Arad, Romania

Tiberiu Dughi, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Romania

Assoc. Prof. PhD, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Arad, Romania

Evelina Balas, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Romania

Assoc. Prof. PhD, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Arad, Romania

Roxana Maier, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Romania

 Assoc. Prof. PhD, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Arad, Romania

Sonia Ignat, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Romania

Lect. PhD, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Arad, Romania

Gavril Rad, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Romania

Assist. Prof. PhD cand, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Arad, Romania


Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bong, W.K., Bergland, A., & Chen, W. (2019). Technology Acceptance and Quality of Life among Older People Using a TUI Application. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16, 4706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234706.

Childers, J. (1995). The Columbia dictionary of modern literary and cultural criticism. Columbia University Press.

Chiu, C. J., Hu, Y. H., Lin, D. C., Chang, F. Y., Chang, C. S., & Lai, C. F. (2016). The attitudes, impact, and learning needs of older adults using apps on touchscreen mobile devices: Results from a pilot study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.020

Clipa, O., & Greciuc, M. A. (2018). Relations of Style of Leadership and Achievement Motivation for Teacher. Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala, 10(4), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/72

Clipa, O., Oliĭnyk, M. I., & Stawiak-Ososińska, M. (Eds.). (2014). The actual problems of the theory and practice of modern pre-school education in Poland, Romania and Ukraine. Lumen Media Publishing.

Davis, F.D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/15192

Dogruel, L., Joeckel, S., & Bowman, N.D. (2015). The use and acceptance of new media entertainment technology by elderly users: Development of an expanded technology acceptance model. Behav. Inf. Technol. 34, 1052–1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2015.1077890

Fauville, G., Luo, M., Queiroz, A.C.M., Bailenson, J.N., & Hancock, J. (2021). Zoom Exhaustion & Fatigue Scale. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 4, 100119, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100119

Hong, X., Zhang, M., & Liu, Q. (2021). Preschool Teachers’ Technology Acceptance During the COVID-19: An Adapted Technology Acceptance Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.691492

Hsiao, C.H., Tang, K.Y. (2015). Examining a model of mobile healthcare technology acceptance by the elderly in Taiwan. J. Glob. Inf. Technol. Manag. 18, 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2015.1108099

Huidu, A. (2018). Redefining Autonomy, Dignity and Intimacy in a Postmodern Society. Revista Românească pentru Educaţie Multidimensională, 10(3), 112-118. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/67

Iancu, A. E., Rusu, A., Măroiu, C., Păcurar, R., & Maricuțoiu, L. P. (2018). The effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing teacher burnout: A meta-analysis. Educational psychology review, 30(2), 373-396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9420-8

Kalayou, M.H., Endehabtu, B.F., Tilahun, B. (2020). The Applicability of the Modified Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) on the Sustainable Adoption of eHealth Systems in Resource-Limited Settings. J Multidiscip Healthc. 13, 1827-1837. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S284973

Kvale, S. (Ed.). (1992). Psychology and postmodernism (Vol. 9). Sage.

Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? a critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manage. 40, 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4

Lekjaroen, K., Ponganantayotin, R., Charoenrat, A., Funilkul, S., Supasitthimethee, U., & Triyason, T. (2016). IoT Planting: Watering system using mobile application for the elderly. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Computer Science and Engineering Conference (ICSEC), Chiangmai, Thailand, pp. 1–6.

Li, Y. H., & Huang, J. W. (2009). Applying theory of perceived risk and technology acceptance model in the online shopping channel. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 53(1), 919-925. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1085603

Liu, H., Wang, L., & Koehler, M. J. (2019). Exploring the intention-behavior gap in the technology acceptance model: a mixed-methods study in the context of foreign-language teaching in China. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 50, 2437–2556. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12824

Lobman, C. (2005). Improvisation: Postmodern play for early childhood teachers. In Practical transformations and transformational practices: Globalization, Postmodernism, and early childhood education. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1

Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 14, 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1

Mâță, L., Clipa, O., & Tzafilkou, K. (2020). The Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure University Teachers’ Attitude towards Ethical Use of Information. Technology for a Sustainable Education. Sustainability, 12(15), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156268

Mostaghel, R. Oghazi, P. (2017). Elderly and technology tools: A fuzzyset qualitative comparative analysis. Qual. Quant., 51, 1969–1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0390-6

Okumus, S., Lewis, L., Wiebe, E., & Hollebrands, K. (2016). Utility and usability as factors influencing teacher decisions about software integration. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev., 64, 1227–1249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9455-4

Palos, R., & Samfira, E. M. (2021). Teachers’ personality, perfectionism, and self-efficacy as predictors for coping strategies based on personal resources. Frontiers in psychology, 5043. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.751930

Park, Y., Son, H., & Kim, C. (2012). Investigating the determinants of construction professionals’ acceptance of web-based training: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Autom. Constr. 22, 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.09.016

Rad, D., Rad, G., Maier, R, Ignat, S. (2022). Theorizing a technology acceptance model in ECEC. Agora Psycho-Pragmatica, 15(1), 1-16. https://www.uav.ro/jour/index.php/app/article/view/1683/1693

Rogers, E. M. (1995). The Diffusion of Innovation (4 ed.). The Free Press.

Samfira, E. M., & Sava, F. A. (2021). Cognitive-behavioral correlates of pupil control ideology. PloS ONE, 16(2), Article e0246787. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246787

Sandu, A., & Frunza, A. (2019). Informed consent in research involving human subjects. In Ethics in research practice and innovation (pp. 171-191). IGI Global.

Sandu, A., & Nistor, P. (2020). Individual versus Social in Psycho-Sociology. The Social Construction of Reality. Moldavian Journal for Education and Social Psychology, 4(2), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.18662/mjesp/4.2/21

Sandu, A., & Nistor, P. (2020b). The Effects of Mass-Media on Social Behavior, Emotions and Cognitions. Logos Universality Mentality Educ. Novelty Sect.: Pol. Sci. & Eur. Stud., 6, 32. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenpses/6.2/21

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Teo, T. (2015). Becoming more specific: measuring and modeling teachers’ perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and learning. Comput. Educ. 88, 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.05.005

Sumak, B, Hericko, M., & Pusnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2067-2077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.005

Tulbure, C., Samfira, E. M., & Samfira, I. (2015). Perception of Pre-Service Teachers Regarding the Relationship between Didactic Competencies and Learning Motivation. Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala, 7(1), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/2015.0701.14

Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23011042

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008a). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2)m, 273-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008b). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Zhang, L., Zhu, J., & Liu, Q. (2012). A meta-analysis of mobile commerce adoption and the moderating effect of culture. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1902-1911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.008




How to Cite

Rad, D., Egerau, A., Roman, A., Dughi, T., Balas, E., Maier, R., Ignat, S., & Rad, G. (2022). A Preliminary Investigation of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Early Childhood Education and Care. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 13(1), 518-533. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/13.1/297

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now