Neuro Art as an Incorporation of the Conscious and the Unconscious in the Modern Exposition of Art Objects

Authors

  • Nataliya Ursu Kamianets-Podilskyi Ivan Ohiienko National University
  • Ivan Hutsul Kamianets-Podilskyi Ivan Ohiienko National University
  • Iryna Paur Kamianets-Podilskyi Ivan Ohiienko National University
  • Ivan Pidhurnyi Kamianets-Podilskyi Ivan Ohiienko National University
  • Timur Takirov Kamianets-Podilskyi Ivan Ohiienko National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/13.3/367

Keywords:

Neuro Art, contemporaries, art exhibition, experience of generations, artistic activity, works of art

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of a new look at the expositional activity of objects of contemporary art in the light of the definition of related artistic phenomena that exist between time-torn cultural epochs. The connection between digitalization, the development of innovative technologies and the influence of the subconscious experience passed down from past generations to descendants is considered. Emphasis is placed on the peculiarities of the evolution of modern art exhibitions, historically stated examples of transcendent personal perception of artistic symbols are given, which encourages consideration of the deep nature of human feelings and finding ways to directly influence the subconscious.

References

Hyman, J. (2010). Art and Neurosciences. In R. Frigg & M. C. Hunter (Eds.), Beyond mimesis and convention in the philosophy of science (pp. 245-261). Berlin: Springer.

Iacob, A. (2020). Human vs. non-human in art: the posthuman sculptures of Patricia Piccinini. Journal for Social Media Inquiry, 2(1), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.18662/jsmi/2.1/8

Karpov, V. V. (2018). Neyromystetstvo v konteksti tvorchosti [Neuro art in the context of creativity]. Bulletin of the National Academy of Management of Culture and Arts: A Quarterly Scientific Journal, 1, 110–115. http://journals.uran.ua/visnyknakkkim/article/view/160039

Kopelyanskaya, N. (2010). Muzey kak sotsial'nyy moderator, ili zachem muzeyu nuzhna obshchestvennaya diskussiya? [Museum as a social moderator, or why does a museum need a public discussion?] In Museum communication: models, technologies, practices (pp. 97–106). Moscow: Institute of Cultural Studies of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation.

Nerubasska, A., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). The demarkation of creativity, talent and genius in humans: A systemic aspect. Postmodern Openings, 11(2), 240-255. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2/172

Nerubasska, A., Palshkov, K., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). A systemic philosophical analysis of the contemporary society and the human: New potential. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.4/235

Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6-7), 15-51. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1999-03452-001

Schmidt, F. I. (1929). Muzeynoye delo: Voprosy ekspozitsii [Museum business: questions of exposition]. Leningrad: Academia.

Tkachuk, T. M., & Melnik Y. G. (2000). Semiotychnyy analiz trypilʹsʹko-kukutensʹkykh znakovykh system (malʹovanyy posud) [Semiotic analysis of Trypillia-Kukuten sign systems (painted ware)]. Ivano-Frankivsk: Play.

Zeki, S. (1999). Inner vision: An exploration of art and the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Ursu, N., Hutsul, I., Paur, I., Pidhurnyi, I., & Takirov, T. (2022). Neuro Art as an Incorporation of the Conscious and the Unconscious in the Modern Exposition of Art Objects. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 13(3), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/13.3/367

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now