Ensuring the Innovativeness of Vocational Education: Neuropedagogical Aspect

Authors

  • Larysa Antoniuk Candidate of Science in Pedagogy, Senior Lecturer of Mathematics and Computer Science Department, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University, Ukraine
  • Olena Soia Candidate of Science in Pedagogy, Senior Lecturer of Mathematics and Computer Science Department, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University, Ukraine
  • Olena Kosovets Candidate of Science in Pedagogy, Senior Lecturer of Mathematics and Computer Science Department, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University, Ukraine
  • Alina Klimishyna Candidate of Science in Pedagogy, Senior Lecturer of Mathematics and Computer Science Department, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University, Ukraine
  • Mariana Kovtoniuk Doctor of Pedagogic Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University, Ukraine
  • Olena Tryfonova Doctor of Science in Pedagogy, Full Professor, Professor of the Department of  Pre-school Education, V.O. Sukhomlynskyi Mykolaiv National University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/13.4/386

Keywords:

Professional training, postmodern, postmodern approach in education, improvement of the educational process, individualized training, professional competence

Abstract

The significance of the outlined direction research is determined by the fact that in modern conditions of postmodern society development, the issues of improving higher education and ensuring the quality of the educational process become relevant.

The need for innovative renewal of the educational process of the higher school is determined by the emergence of a number of psychological and pedagogical problems, taking into account the conditions of postmodernity(mismatch between the needs of employers, the existing state of future professionals training and scientific and pedagogical staff’s qualifications, lack of mechanisms for selective processing of information, insufficient provision of information and psychological security of the individual, the need to develop an inclusive educational environment in higher education, etc.). The main conceptual principles of the innovative development of the educational environment in postmodern conditions are highlighted (humanization of the educational process, providing developmental learning and personality-oriented approach).

The article analyzes the foreign and domestic experience of using innovative educational technologies (individualized, personality-oriented learning, as well as gamification of the future training professionals’ process), identifies their advantages and disadvantages. Peculiarities of their introduction into the practice of higher education in postmodern conditions are outlined.

Prospects for further research are the development of practical recommendations for the introduction of innovative educational technologies in the future professionals training in higher education.

References

Acar, O. A., & Tuncdogan, A. (2019). Using the inquiry-based learning approach to enhance student innovativeness: a conceptual model. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(7), 895–909. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1516636

Aljawarneh, S. A. (2020). Reviewing and exploring innovative ubiquitous learning tools in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32, 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09207-0

Anohina-Naumeca, A. (2015). Justifying the usage of concept mapping as a tool for the formative assessment of the structural knowledge of engineering students. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 7(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2015.07.005

Askeland, G. A., & Payne, M. (2006). The postmodern student: piloting through uncertainty. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 26(3/4), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1300/J067v26n03_11

Bayley, T., Wheatley, D., & Hurst, A. (2021). Assessing a novel problem‐based learning approach with game elements in a business analytics course. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, Special Issue: Enhancing Business School Courses through Game‐Based Pedagogy, 19(3), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12246

Beatty, J. E., Chen, Y., & Klein, B. D. (2021). Games and gamification in business school courses: Experiential education that creates engagement and flow. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, Special Issue: Enhancing Business School Courses through Game‐Based Pedagogy, 19(3), 170–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12250

Beh, I. D. (2014). Education as the highest professional skill of a teacher. New Learning Technologies. Scientific and Methodical Collection Institute of Innovative Technologies and Content of Education of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, 81, 24–30.

Beheshti, S. (2005). Explanation and criticism of postmodernism in contemporary educational philosophy. Samt.

Bekh, V., Vashkevych, V., Kravchenko, A., Yaroshenko, A., Akopian, V., & Antonenko, T. (2021). Education as a Way of Human Existence in a Postmodern Society. Postmodern Openings, 12(3), 01–14. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.3/324

Berne, E. (2016). Games people play.The Psychology of Human Relationships. Penguin.

Bondarevskaya, E. V. (1995). Value bases of personality-oriented education. Pedagogy.

Borrego, M., Karlin, J., McNair, L. D., & Beddoes, K. (2013). Team Effectiveness Theory from Industrial and Organizational Psychology Applied to Engineering Student Project Teams: A Research Review. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 472–512. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20023

Bryant, I., Johnston, R., & Usher, R. (1997). Adult Education and the Postmodern Challenge. Learning beyond the Limits. Routledge.

Burbules, N. C. (2010). Postmodernism and Education. In H. Siegel (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195312881.003.0029

Busso, D. S., & Pollack, C. (2015). No brain left behind: consequences of neuroscience discourse for education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(2), 168–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.908908

Chhabra, S., Bose, K., & Chadha, N. (2018). Early childhood educators’ perspectives and practices about inclusion of children with special needs in Botswana. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 32(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2018.1425223

Chou, H-C., Liu, Y-W., & Lee, C-C. (2021). Automatic Deception Detection using Multiple Speech and Language Communicative Descriptors in Dialogs. APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing, 10(1), e5. https://doi.org/10.1017/atsip.2021.6

Cooper, D. E. (2005). Postmodernism. A Companion to the Philosophy of Education (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy). Blackwell Publishing.

Craddock, D., & Mathias, H. (2009). Assessment options in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801956026

Damnik, G., Proske, A., & Körndle, H. (2017). Designing a constructive learning activity with interactive elements: the effects of perspective-shifting and the quality of source material. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(5), 634–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1172239

Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P., & Jolles, J. (2012). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(2), 429. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429

Dembitska, S. V. (2019). The use of methods of active learning in the process of forming the occupational safety competence of future specialists in mechanical engineering [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ulletin of the National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine.

Dembitska, S. V., Kobylyanskaya, I. M., & Pugach, S. S. (2020). Features of the implementation of lifelong learning of specialists in technical specialties. Pedagogical Almanac, 46, 117–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37915/pa.vi46.117

Demchenko, I., Maksymchuk, B., Bilan, V., Maksymchuk, I., & Kalynovska, I. (2021). Training Future Physical Education Teachers for Professional Activities under the Conditions of Inclusive Education. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 12(3), 191–213. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.3/227

Egberink, I. J. L., Meijer, R. R., & Tendeiro, J. N. (2015). Investigating Measurement Invariance in Computer-Based Personality Testing: The impact of using anchor items on effect size indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75(1), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164414520965

Elerding, С. (2016). The Materiality of the Digital: Petro-Enlightenment and the Aesthetics of Invisibility. Postmodern Culture, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1353/pmc.2016.0007

Evans, C. (2013). Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350

Fertalj, K, Milašinović, B., & Nižetić, I. (2013). Problems and experiences with student projects based on real- world problems: A case study. Technics Technologies Education Management, 8(1), 176–186.

García Carrasco, J., Hernández Serrano, M. J., & Martín García, A. V. (2015). Plasticity as a framing concept enabling transdisciplinary understanding and research in neuroscience and education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(2), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.908907

Giroux, H. (1999). Border Youth. Difference and Postmodern Education. In P. McLaren (Ed.), Critical Education in the New Information Age (pp. 93-115). Rowman and Littlefield.

Golovko, N. (2015). Game technologies as a means of activating students’ cognitive activity. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv., Pedagogy Series, 1, 17–20.

Goswami, U. (2006). Neuroscience and education: from research to practice? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(5), 406–413. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1907

Haidamaka, О., Kolisnyk-Humeniuk, Y., Storizhko, L., Marchenko, Т., Poluboiaryna, І. & Bilova, N. (2022). Innovative Teaching Technologies in Postmodern Education: Foreign and Domestic Experience. Postmodern Openings, 13(1), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1Sup1/419

Hassan, A. B. O. (2014). The role of peer-learning and formative assessment in effective engineering learning environments. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 6(2), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-04-2013-0015

Hlushko, T. K. (2012). Psychological and pedagogical features of the professional activity of a university teacher in a changing external information environment. In Psychological and Pedagogical Problems in the Educational Process (pp. 37–43). KhNPU.

Hossienia, A., & Khalilib, S. (2011). Explanation of creativity in postmodern educational ideas. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1307–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.283

Howard-Jones, P. (2013). Neuroscience and Education: A Review of Educational Interventions and Approaches Informed by Neuroscience. Education Enddowment Foundation https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/evidence-reviews/neuroscience-and-education

Howard-Jones, P., Ott, M., van Leeuwen, T., & De Smedt, B. (2015). The potential relevance of cognitive neuroscience for the development and use of technology-enhanced learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(2), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.919321

Kahraman, A. D. (2015). Relationship of modernism, postmodernism and reflections of it on education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3991 – 3996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1146

Klemantovich, I. P., Levanova, E. A., & Stepanov, V. G. (2016). Neuropedagogy: a new branch of scientific knowledge. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 2, 8–17.

Kong, S-C. (2021). Delivery and evaluation of an e-Learning framework through computer-aided analysis of learners’ reflection text in a teacher development course. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00172-w

Kosholap, A., Maksymchuk, B., Branitska, T., Martynets, L., Boichenko, A., Stoliarenko, O., Matsuk, L., Surovov, O., Stoliarenko, O., & Maksymchuk, I. (2021). Neuropsychological Bases of Self-Improvement of Own Physical Health of Future Teachers in the Course of University Education. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 12(3), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.3/226

Kravets, O. E., & Sviridenko, I. M. (2016). The use of adaptive technology in foreign language classes at universities in the study of modern norms of academic writing. Science and Education a New Dimension (pp. 15-18). Philology.

Lavy, I., & Yadin, A. (2010). Team-based peer review as a form of formative assessment: The case of a systems analysis and design workshop. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(1), 85–98. https://aisel.aisnet.org/jise/vol21/iss1/8/

Litzinger, T., Lattuca, L. R., Hadgraft, R., & Newstetter, W. (2011). Engineering Education and the Development of Expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 123–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00006.x

Marco, M. M. (2018). Formation of readiness of future teachers of initial classes to application of educational and game technologies in professional activity. Peter.

Meltzoff, A. N., Kuhl, P. K., Movellan, J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2009). Foundations for a New Science of Learning. Science, 325(5938), 284–288. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1175626

Morris, C., Milton, E., & Goldstone, R. (2019). Case study: suggesting choice: inclusive assessment processes. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1669479

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Pickering, S. J., & Howard-Jones, P. (2007). Educators’ Views on the Role of Neuroscience in Education: Findings From a Study of UK and International Perspectives. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(3), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228x.2007.00011.x

Podmazin, S. I. (2006). Personality-oriented education: essence and content. Culturological Bulletin, 16, 123–128. https://doi.org/http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Kultv_2006_16_25

Prots, R., Yakovliv, V., Medynskyi, S., Kharchenko, R., Hryb, T., Klymenchenko, T., Ihnatenko, S., Buzhyna, I., & Maksymchuk, B. (2021). Psychophysical Training of Young People for Homeland Defence Using means of Physical Culture and Sports. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 12(3), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.3/225

Shchedrovitsky, G. P. (1983). Organizational-activity game as a new form of organization and method of development of collective thinking. In Methods of research, diagnosis and development of international labor collectives (pp. 33–53). VNISI.

Søndergaard, H., & Mulder, R. A. (2012). Collaborative learning through formative peer review: pedagogy, programs and potential. Computer Science Education, 22(4), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2012.728041

Taylor, M. L. (2005). Generation NeXt: Today’s Postmodern Student–Meeting, Teaching, and Serving. A Collection of Papers on Self-Study and Institutional Improvement, 2(4), 99-107. https://www.lewisu.edu/welcome/offices/provost/pdf/Gen%20NeXt%20Handout%202005.pdf

Tepper, J. (2014). Assessment for learning systems analysis and design using constructivist techniques. In Annual Learning and Teaching Conference 2014: Enhancing the STEM Student Journey. The Higher Education Academy. https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/private/comp-044-p_0_1568037095.pdf

Tuya J., & Garcia-Fanjul, J. Teaching requirements analysis by means of student collaboration. In FIE'99 Frontiers in Education. 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (vol.1, pp. 11B4/11-11B4/15). IEEE Xplore. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1999.839227

Vaccar, C., & Chadwick, A. (2020). Deepfakes and Disinformation: Exploring the Impact of Synthetic Political Video on Deception, Uncertainty, and Trust in News. Social Media + Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408

Watson, M. K., Pelkey, J., Noyes, C. R., & Rodgers, M. O. (2016). Assessing Conceptual Knowledge Using Three Concept Map Scoring Methods. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(1), 118–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20111

Willey, K., & Gardner, A. (2012). Collaborative learning frameworks to promote a positive learning culture. In 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings (pp. 1–6). IEEE Xplore. https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.2012.6462401

Yakimanskaya, I. S. (2000). Technology of personality-oriented education. Sentjabr.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-21

How to Cite

Antoniuk, L., Soia, O., Kosovets, O., Klimishyna, A., Kovtoniuk, M., & Tryfonova, O. (2022). Ensuring the Innovativeness of Vocational Education: Neuropedagogical Aspect. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 13(4), 242-263. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/13.4/386

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now