The Evolutionary Principles of the Attractiveness of Symmetry and Their Possible Sustainability in the Context of Research Ambiguities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/14.1/433Keywords:
attractiveness, symmetry, beauty, evolution, neuroscience, cognitionAbstract
Symmetry belongs to one of the basic principles of the beauty of human and non-human objects since antiquity. Even though its significance has been verified by numerous theories and research studies, there is a number of papers suggesting that this principle may be false. The study identifies five major evolutionary principles, in the context of new approaches and research ambiguities based mainly on neuroscience and evolutionary psychology, that support the thesis that highlights the significance of symmetry in the perception and assessment of attractiveness: 1. symmetry as an honest signal of various health characteristics; 2. symmetry as proof of developmental stability; 3. effectiveness; 4. comprehensibility; 5. predictability. In the context of the mechanisms described above it also seeks possible explanations for the existence of contradictory research results related to the attractiveness of symmetry. The outcome of the study is the postulation of three hypotheses: 1. the naturalness hypothesis (symmetry is only attractive to the same degree that it naturally occurs in the subject); 2. the accent hypothesis (minor asymmetries do not disprove the principles of symmetry, they make them more visible); 3. the ecology hypothesis (the attractiveness of symmetry is conditioned by the situation and depends on the type of subject assessed) that allow us to integrate both past and contemporary (and putatively contradictory) research findings. The paper also provides proposals for the verification of the postulated hypotheses.
References
Agnew, P., & Koella, J. C. (1997). Virulence, Parasite Mode of Transmission, and Host Fluctuating Asymmetry. Proceedings. Biological sciences, 264(1378), 9–15, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1997.0002
Aristotle (1998). Metaphysics. Penguin Books.
Bertamini, M., & Makin, A. D. J. (2014). Brain Activity in Response to Visual Symmetry. Symmetry, 6(4), 975–996, https://doi.org/10.3390/sym6040975
Bertamini, M., Rampone, G., Makin, A. D. J., & Jessop, A. (2019). Symmetry Preference in Shapes, Faces, Flowers and Landscapes. PeerJ, 7, e7078, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7078
Budaev, S., Jørgensen, C., Mangel, M., Eliassen, S., & Giske, J. (2019). Decision-Making From the Animal Perspective: Bridging Ecology and Subjective Cognition. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 164, https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00164
Cárdenas, R. A., & Harris, L. J. (2006). Symmetrical Decorations Enhance the Attractiveness of Faces and Abstract Designs. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(1), 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.05.002
Chen, C. C., Kao, K. L. C., & Tyler, C. W. (2007). Face Configuration Processing in the Human Brain: The Role of Symmetry. Cerebral Cortex, 17(6), 1423–1432. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhl054
Choi, K. Y. (2015). Analysis of Facial Asymmetry. Archives of craniofacial surgery, 16(1), 1–10, https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2015.16.1.1
Cicero, M. T. (1971). Tusculan Disputations. Harvard University Press.
Davenport, J. L., & Potter, M. C. (2004). Scene Consistency in Object and Background Perception. Psychological science, 15(8), 559–564, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00719.x
de Barra, M., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Mahmud, Z. H., & Curtis, V. A. (2013). Illness in Childhood Predicts Face Preferences in Adulthood. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(6), 384–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.07.001
Demuth, A. (2019). Beauty, Aesthetic Experience, and Emotional Affective States. Peter Lang.
Demuth, A., Demuthova, S., & Slavkovsky, A. (2019). Mathematics and Beauty: An Attempt to Link the Cognitive and Philosophical-Spiritual Aspects of Beauty. Peter Lang.
Demuthova, S., Selecka, L., & Demuth, A. (2019). Human Facial Attractiveness in Psychological Research (An Evolutionary Approach). Berlin, Peter Lang.
Enquist, M., & Arak, A. (1994). Symmetry, Beauty and Evolution. Nature, 372(6502), 169–172, https://doi.org/10.1038/372169a0.
Enquist, M., & Johnstone, R. A. (1997). Generalization and the Evolution of Symmetry Preferences. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 264(1386), 1345–1348, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1997.0186
Foo, Y. Z., Simmons, L. W., Rhodes, G. (2017). Predictors of Facial Attractiveness and Health in Humans. Scientific reports, 7, 39731, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39731
Freyd, J., & Tversky, B. (1984). Force of Symmetry in Form Perception. The American Journal of Psychology, 97(1), 109–126, https://doi.org/10.2307/1422551
Gartus, A., & Leder, H. (2013). The Small Step toward Asymmetry: Aesthetic Judgment of Broken Symmetries. i-Perception, 4(5), 361–364, https://doi.org/10.1068/i0588sas
Gilbert-Barness, E. (2010). Teratogenic causes of malformations. Annals of clinical and laboratory science, 40(2), 99–114. PMID: 20421621
Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo Sapiens) Facial Attractiveness and Sexual Selection: The Role of Symmetry and Averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108(3), 233–242, https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233
Greenwood, J. D. (1989). Explanation and Experiment in Social Psychological Science. Springer.
Hales, T. C. (2001). The Honeycomb Conjecture. Discrete & Computational Geometry, 25, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1007/s004540010071
Hatch, C. D., Wehby, G. L., Nidey, N. L., & Moreno Uribe, L. M. (2017). Effects of Objective 3-Dimensional Measures of Facial Shape and Symmetry on Perceptions of Facial Attractiveness. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 75(9), 1958–1970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.04.042
Herbert, A. M., Overbury, O., Singh, J., & Faubert, J. (2002). Aging and Bilateral Symmetry Detection. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57, P241–P245. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.3.P241
Hockenberry J., Spiropulu, M., Lightman, A., Gross, D., & Dijkgraaf, R. (2018, October 20). Beyond Beauty: The Predictive Power of Symmetry. https://ihavenotv.com/beyond-beauty-the-predictive-power-of-symmetry-world-science-festival
Huang, Y., Lyu, J., Xue, X., & Peng, K. (2020). Cognitive Basis for the Development of Aesthetic Preference: Findings from Symmetry Preference. PLoS ONE, 15, e0239973, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239973
Jacobsen, T., & Höfel, L. (2003). Descriptive and Evaluative Judgment Processes: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Indices of Processing Symmetry and Aesthetics. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3(4), 289–299, https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.3.4.289
Jasienska, G., Lipson, S. F., Ellison, P. T., Thune, I., & Ziomkiewicz, A. (2006). Symmetrical Women Have Higher Potential Fertility. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(5), 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.01.001
Jones, A., & Jaeger, B. (2019). Biological Bases of Beauty Revisited: The Effect of Symmetry, Averageness, and Sexual Dimorphism on Female Facial Attractiveness. Symmetry, 11(2), 279. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11020279
Juarez-Carreño, S., Morante, J., & Dominguez, M. (2018). Systemic Signalling and Local Effectors in Developmental Stability, Body Symmetry, and Size. Cell stress, 2(12), 340–361. https://doi.org/10.15698/cst2018.12.167
Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking fast and slow. Penguin Books.
Kaipainen, A. E., Sieber, K. R., Nada, R. M., Maal, T. J., Katsaros, C., & Fudalej, P. S. (2016). Regional Facial Asymmetries and Attractiveness of the Face. European journal of orthodontics, 38(6), 602–608, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv087
Katkov, M., Harris, H., & Sagi, D. (2015). Visual Perception of Order-Disorder Transition. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 734. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00734
Kobyliansky, E., & Livshits, G. (1989). Age-Dependent Changes in Morphometric and Biochemical Traits. Annals of Human Biology, 16(3), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014468900000352
Kočnar, T., Saribay, S. A. & Kleisner, K. (2019). Perceived Attractiveness of Czech Faces across 10 Cultures: Associations with Sexual Shape Dimorphism, Averageness, Fluctuating Asymmetry, and Eye Color. PLoS ONE, 14, e0225549. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225549
Kohler, P. J., Clarke, A., Yakovleva, A., Liu, Y., & Norcia, A. M. (2016). Representation of Maximally Regular Textures in Human Visual Cortex. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 36(3), 714–729. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2962-15.2016
Komori, M., Kawamura, S., & Ishihara, S. (2009). Averageness or Symmetry: Which Is More Important for Facial Attractiveness? Acta Psychologica, 131(2), 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.03.008
Kordsmeyer, T. L., Thies, Y. T. K., Ekrami, O., Stern, J. Schild, C., Spoiala, C., … Penke, L. (2020). No Evidence for an Association between Facial Fluctuating Asymmetry and Vocal Attractiveness in Men or Women. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 2, e35. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2020.36
Lightman, A. P. (2013). The Accidental Universe: The World You Thought You Knew (First American ed.). Pantheon Books.
Little, A. (2014). Domain Specificity in Human Symmetry Preferences: Symmetry Is Most Pleasant When Looking at Human Faces. Symmetry, 6(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym6020222
Little, A. C., Apicella, C. L., & Marlowe, F. W. (2007). Preferences for Symmetry in Human Faces in Two Cultures: Data from the UK and the Hadza, an Isolated Group of Hunter-Gatherers. Proceedings. Biological sciences, 274(1629), 3113–3117. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0895
Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M. (2011). Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary Based Research. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 366(1571), 1638–1659, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0404
Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Waitt, C., Tiddeman, B. P., Feinberg, D. R., Perrett, D. I., … Marlowe, F. W. (2008). Symmetry Is Related to Sexual Dimorphism in Faces: Data Across Culture and Species. PLoS ONE, 3, e2106. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002106
Livshits, G., & Kobyliansky, E. (1984). Biochemical Heterozygosity as a Predictor of Developmental Homeostasis in Man. Annals of human genetics, 48(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1984.tb01012.x
Machilsen, B.; Pauwels, M.; Wagemans, J. The Role of Vertical Mirror Symmetry in Visualshape Detection. Journal of Vision, 9(12), 11.1–11. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.12.11
Makin, A. D. J., Pecchinenda, A., & Bertamini, M. (2012). Implicit Affective Evaluation of Visual Symmetry. Emotion, 12(5), 1021-1030. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026924
Makin, A. D. J., Rampone, G., & Bertamini, M. (2015). Conditions for View Invariance in the Neural Response to Visual Symmetry: View Invariance and Symmetry ERPs. Psychophysiology, 52(4), 532–543, https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12365.
Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., & Lewis-Jones, D. I. (1998). Developmental Stability, Ejaculate Size, and Sperm Quality in Men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19(5), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00024-5
Martinovic, J., Jennings, B. J. Makin, A. D. J., Bertamini, M., & Angelescu, I. (2018). Symmetry Perception for Patterns Defined by Color and Luminance. Journal of Vision, 18(8), 4. https://doi.org/10.1167/18.8.4
McManus, I. C. (2005). Symmetry and Asymmetry in Aesthetics and the Arts. European Review, 13(S2), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798705000736
Møller, A. P. (1990). Fluctuating Asymmetry in Male Sexual Ornaments May Reliably Reveal Male Quality. Animal Behaviour, 40(6), 1185–1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80187-3
Møller, A. P. (1997). Developmental Stability and Fitness: A Review. The American Naturalist, 149(5), 916–932. https://doi.org/10.1086/286030
Møller, A. P.; Soler, M., & Thornhill, R. (1995). Breast Asymmetry, Sexual Selection, and Human Reproductive Success. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(3), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(95)00002-3
Mudrik, L., Deouell, L. Y., & Lamy, D. (2011). Scene Congruency Biases Binocular Rivalry. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(3), 756–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.01.001
Mühlenbeck, C., Liebal, K., Pritsch, C., & Jacobsen, T. (2016). Differences in the Visual Perception of Symmetric Patterns in Orangutans (Pongo Pygmaeus Abelii) and Two Human Cultural Groups: A Comparative Eye-Tracking Study. Frontiers in psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00408
Muñoz-Reyes, J. A., Iglesias-Julios, M., Pita, M., & Turiegano, E. (2015). Facial Features: What Women Perceive as Attractive and What Men Consider Attractive. PLoS ONE, 10, e0132979. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132979
Niimi, R., Watanabe, K., & Yokosawa, K. (2005). The Role of Visible Persistence for Perception of Visual Bilateral Symmetry. Japanese Psychological Research, 47(4), 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5884.2005.00295.x
Peng, P., Marceau, C., Hervé, M., Corkum, P. B., Naumov, A. Y., & Villeneuve, D. M. (2019). Symmetry of Molecular Rydberg States Revealed by XUV Transient Absorption Spectroscopy. Nature communications, 10(1), 5269. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13251-w
Penton-Voak, I., & Perrett, D. I. (2000). Consistency and Individual Differences in Facial Attractiveness Judgements: An Evolutionary Perspective. Social Research, 67(1), 219–244. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40971383
Pitcher, D., Walsh, V., & Duchaine, B. (2011). Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies of Face Processing. In A. J. Calder, G. Rhodes, M. H. Johnson, & J. V. Haxby (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Face Perception (pp. 367–385). Oxford University Press.
Plotinus. The six enneads of Plotinus. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Pramod, R. T., & Arun, S. P. (2018). Symmetric Objects Become Special in Perception Because of Generic Computations in Neurons. Psychological Science, 29(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617729808.
Reber, R. (2002). Reasons for the Preference for Symmetry. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(3), 415-416. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02350076
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver’s Processing Experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
Rhodes, G., Proffitt, F., Grady, J. M., & Sumich, A. (1998). Facial Symmetry and the Perception of Beauty. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(4), 659–669, https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208842
Rhodes, G., Yoshikawa, S., Clark, A., Lee, K., McKay, R., & Akamatsu, S. (2001). Attractiveness of Facial Averageness and Symmetry in Non-Western Cultures: In Search of Biologically Based Standards of Beauty. Perception, 30(5), 611–625. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3123
Sandu, A. (2011). Quantum Metaphysics. Postmodern Openings, 2(6), 7–22.
Scheib, J. E., Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1999). Facial Attractiveness, Symmetry and Cues of Good Genes. Proceedings. Biological sciences, 266(1431), 1913–1917. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0866
Scherer, U., Kuhnhardt, M., & Schuett, W. (2018). Predictability Is Attractive: Female Preference for Behaviourally Consistent Males but No Preference for the Level of Male Aggression in a Bi-Parental Cichlid. PLoS ONE, 13, e0195766. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195766
Schlagberger, E. M., Bornmann, L., & Bauer, J. (2016). At What Institutions Did Nobel Laureates Do Their Prize-Winning Work? An Analysis of Biographical Information on Nobel Laureates from 1994 to 2014. Scientometrics, 109(2), 723–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2059-2
Sebregondi, L. (2006). Giotto at Santa Croce. Polistampa.
Shackelford, T. K., & Larsen, R. J. (1997). Facial Asymmetry as an Indicator of Psychological, Emotional, and Physiological Distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.456
Sheldon, P. (2009). "I'll Poke You. You'll Poke Me!" Self-disclosure, Social Attraction, Predictability and Trust as Important Predictors of Facebook Relationships. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3(2), Article 1. https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4225/3267
Shen, H., Chau, D. K. P., Su, J., Zeng, L. L., Jiang, W., He, J., … Hu, D. (2016). Brain Responses to Facial Attractiveness Induced by Facial Proportions: Evidence from an FMRI Study. Scientific Reports, 6, 35905, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35905
Simmons, L. W., Rhodes, G., Peters, M., & Koehler, N. (2004). Are Human Preferences for Facial Symmetry Focused on Signals of Developmental Instability? Behavioral Ecology, 15(5), 864–871. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh099
Swaddle, J., & Cuthill, I. (1995). Asymmetry and Human Facial Attractiveness: Symmetry May Not Always Be Beautiful. Proceedings. Biological sciences, 261(1360), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1995.0124
Tovée, M. J., Tasker, K., Benson, & P. J. (2000). Is Symmetry a Visual Cue to Attractiveness in the Human Female Body? Evolution and Human Behavior, 21(3), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00040-4
Troje, N. F., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1998). How Is Bilateral Symmetry of Human Faces Used for Recognition of Novel Views? Vision Research, 38(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00165-X
Underwood, G. (2005). Eye Fixations on Pictures of Natural Scenes: Getting the Gist and Identifying the Components. In G. Underwood, G. (Ed.), Cognitive Processes in Eye Guidance (pp. 163–187). Oxford University Press.
Voloshinov, A. V. (1996). Symmetry as a Superprinciple of Science and Art, Leonardo, 29(2), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/1576340
Waitt, C., & Little, A. C. (2006). Preferences for Symmetry in Conspecific Facial Shape Among Macaca Mulatta. International Journal of Primatology, 27(1), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-005-9015-y
Wang, H. C., Hwang, A. D., & Pomplun, M. (2010). Object Frequency and Predictability Effects on Eye Fixation Durations in Real-World Scene Viewing. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 3(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.3.3.3
Weichselbaum, H., Leder, H., & Ansorge, U. (2018). Implicit and Explicit Evaluation of Visual Symmetry as a Function of Art Expertise. i-Perception, 9, 204166951876146. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669518761464
Yarosh, D. (2019). Perception and Deception: Human Beauty and the Brain. Behavioral Sciences, 9(4), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs9040034
Yu, K., & Blake, R. (1992). Do Recognizable Figures Enjoy an Advantage in Binocular Rivalry? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1158–1173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1158
Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate Selection—A Selection for a Handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53(1), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3
Zaidel, D. W., & Cohen, J. A. THE Face, Beauty, and Symmetry: Perceiving Asymmetry in Beautiful Faces. International Journal of Neuroscience, 115(8), 1165–1173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450590914464
Zaidel, D. W., & Deblieck, C. (2007). Attractiveness of Natural Faces Compared to Computer Constructed Perfectly Symmetrical Faces. International Journal of Neuroscience, 117(4), 423–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450600581928
Zaidel, D. W., & Hessamian, M. (2010). Asymmetry and Symmetry in the Beauty of Human Faces. Symmetry, 2(1), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym2010136
Zheng, R., Ren, D., Xie, C., Pan, J., & Zhou, G. (2021). Normality Mediates the Effect of Symmetry on Facial Attractiveness. Acta Psychologica, 217, 103311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103311
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
