The Ethics of Monadic Identity in Leibniz's Thought
Keywords:preordained harmony, „the best of all possible worlds”, free will, monad, ethics
The system of pre-established harmony proposed by Leibnizian ontology gives perspective to a Universe thought of as a perfect machine, or as a "perfect kingdom, governed by an absolute Prince". In this „best of all possible worlds”, the occurrence of evil requires an extremely thorough justification. With regard to the prospective motivation and argument in favor of existence of evil in the world, the ethical positioning of the human soul, conceived of as a superior monad, capable of true understanding and a reflection of divine grace, can also be outlined. What place, therefore, does evil occupy in the Leibnizian universal equation and how is it possible to embody it from the perspective of free will? In a system of such predetermined order, what possibility is there for the existence of freedom? In this universal order, what place does absolute necessity, hypothetical necessity and moral necessity occupy? And what is their connection with the essential cosmic logical, geometrical and metaphysical principles? Do reason, will, and power, as absolute features of the Godhead, contribute to guaranteeing the ethical responsibility of higher monads? How does Leibniz bring together the predetermination and typology of fatality expressed through the paradigms: fatum mahometanum, fatum stoicum and fatum christianum? "Divinity as the first agent and man as the patient and second agent" - is a Leibnizian interpretation of the relation of predetermination. Evil and free will are recognized only in the framework of hypothetical necessity.
So, therefore, in the present work we will analyze, among other things, the Leibnizian interpretation of the ratio of predetermination, recalling the difference between being inclined and being forced in making a decision.
Antognazza, M.R. (2015). The Hypercategorematic Infinite. The Leibniz Review, 25, 20. https://www.pdcnet.org/leibniz/free/25
Copleston, F. (2011). Istoria filosofiei. Vol. IV. Raţionaliştii. De la Descartes la Leibniz. ALL Publishing House.
Deleuze, G. (1992). The Fold. Leibniz and the Baroque. University Of Minnesota Press.
Dumitrescu, M. (2012). Tema creaţiei continue în Eseurile de teodicee ale lui Leibniz. Logos, Universality, Mentality, Education, Novelty, Section: Philosophy and Humanistic Sciences, I(1), 49-66.
Flonta, M. (1998). Descartes şi Leibniz. Ascensiunea şi posteritatea raţionalismului. Universal Dalsi Publishing.
Floridi, L. (2022). How to Counter Moral Evil: Paideia and Nomos. Philosophy & Technology, 35, 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00515-5
Graham, D. J. (2023) Nine insights from internet engineering that help us understand brain network communication. Frontiers in Computer Science, 4, 976801. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2022.976801
Hipólito, I. (2022). Cognition Without Neural Representation: Dynamics of a Complex System. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 643276. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643276
Kulstad, M., & Carlin, L. (2020). Leibniz’s Philosophy of Mind. E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition). Stanford Encyclopedia. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/leibniz-mind/
Leibniz, G. W. (1972). Monadologia, Opere filozofice, Vol. 1. Ştiinţifică şi Enciclopedică Publishing.
Leibniz, G. W. (1997). Eseuri de teodicee. Polirom Publishing.
Leibniz, G. W. (2001). Scrieri filosofice. ALL Publishing.
Leibniz, G. W. (2003). Noi eseuri asupra intelectului omenesc. All Educational Publishing.
Marquis, P. Papini, O., & Prade, H. (2014). Some Elements for a Prehistory of Artificial Intelligence in the Last Four Centuries. T. Schaub, et al. (Eds.), Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 263, (pp. 609-614). IOS Press Ebooks. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-419-0-609
Mercer, C. (2001). Leibniz's Metaphysics. Its Origins and Development. Cambridge University Press.
Niță, A. (1998). Leibniz. Serie monografică. Paideia Publishing.
Parr, T., & Friston, K. J. (2018). The Anatomy of Inference: Generative Models and Brain Structure. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 12, 90. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2018.00090
Râmbu, N. (1997). Studiu introductiv la Leibniz, G. W. Eseuri de teodicee. Polirom Publishing.
Richards, B. A., & Lillicrap, T. P. (2022). The Brain-Computer Metaphor Debate Is Useless: A Matter of Semantics. Frontiers in Computer Science, 4, 810358. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2022.810358
Russell, B.  (2005). The Philosophy of Leibniz. Routledge.
Safron, A. (2020) An Integrated World Modeling Theory (IWMT) of Consciousness: Combining Integrated Information and Global Neuronal Workspace Theories With the Free Energy Principle and Active Inference Framework; Toward Solving the Hard Problem and Characterizing Agentic Causation. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 3, 30. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00030
Safron, A. (2022). Integrated world modeling theory expanded: Implications for the future of consciousness. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 16, 642397. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2022.642397
Safron, A., Klimaj, V., & Hipólito, I. (2022). On the Importance of Being Flexible: Dynamic Brain Networks and Their Potential Functional Significances. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 15, 688424. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2021.688424
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs