The Ethics of Monadic Identity in Leibniz's Thought


  • Marius Cucu Lecturer Ph.D., Stefan cel Mare University, Suceava, Romania
  • Oana Lenţa Associate lecturer, Ph.D., Stefan cel Mare University, Suceava, Romania



preordained harmony, „the best of all possible worlds”, free will, monad, ethics


The system of pre-established harmony proposed by Leibnizian ontology gives perspective to a Universe thought of as a perfect machine, or as a "perfect kingdom, governed by an absolute Prince". In this „best of all possible worlds”, the occurrence of evil requires an extremely thorough justification. With regard to the prospective motivation and argument in favor of existence of evil in the world, the ethical positioning of the human soul, conceived of as a superior monad, capable of true understanding and a reflection of divine grace, can also be outlined. What place, therefore, does evil occupy in the Leibnizian universal equation and how is it possible to embody it from the perspective of free will? In a system of such predetermined order, what possibility is there for the existence of freedom? In this universal order, what place does absolute necessity, hypothetical necessity and moral necessity occupy? And what is their connection with the essential cosmic logical, geometrical and metaphysical principles? Do reason, will, and power, as absolute features of the Godhead, contribute to guaranteeing the ethical responsibility of higher monads? How does Leibniz bring together the predetermination and typology of fatality expressed through the paradigms: fatum mahometanum, fatum stoicum and fatum christianum? "Divinity as the first agent and man as the patient and second agent" - is a Leibnizian interpretation of the relation of predetermination. Evil and free will are recognized only in the framework of hypothetical necessity. 

So, therefore, in the present work we will analyze, among other things, the Leibnizian interpretation of the ratio of predetermination, recalling the difference between being inclined and being forced in making a decision.


Antognazza, M.R. (2015). The Hypercategorematic Infinite. The Leibniz Review, 25, 20.

Copleston, F. (2011). Istoria filosofiei. Vol. IV. Raţionaliştii. De la Descartes la Leibniz. ALL Publishing House.

Deleuze, G. (1992). The Fold. Leibniz and the Baroque. University Of Minnesota Press.

Dumitrescu, M. (2012). Tema creaţiei continue în Eseurile de teodicee ale lui Leibniz. Logos, Universality, Mentality, Education, Novelty, Section: Philosophy and Humanistic Sciences, I(1), 49-66.

Flonta, M. (1998). Descartes şi Leibniz. Ascensiunea şi posteritatea raţionalismului. Universal Dalsi Publishing.

Floridi, L. (2022). How to Counter Moral Evil: Paideia and Nomos. Philosophy & Technology, 35, 18.

Graham, D. J. (2023) Nine insights from internet engineering that help us understand brain network communication. Frontiers in Computer Science, 4, 976801.

Hipólito, I. (2022). Cognition Without Neural Representation: Dynamics of a Complex System. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 643276.

Kulstad, M., & Carlin, L. (2020). Leibniz’s Philosophy of Mind. E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition). Stanford Encyclopedia.

Leibniz, G. W. (1972). Monadologia, Opere filozofice, Vol. 1. Ştiinţifică şi Enciclopedică Publishing.

Leibniz, G. W. (1997). Eseuri de teodicee. Polirom Publishing.

Leibniz, G. W. (2001). Scrieri filosofice. ALL Publishing.

Leibniz, G. W. (2003). Noi eseuri asupra intelectului omenesc. All Educational Publishing.

Marquis, P. Papini, O., & Prade, H. (2014). Some Elements for a Prehistory of Artificial Intelligence in the Last Four Centuries. T. Schaub, et al. (Eds.), Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 263, (pp. 609-614). IOS Press Ebooks.

Mercer, C. (2001). Leibniz's Metaphysics. Its Origins and Development. Cambridge University Press.

Niță, A. (1998). Leibniz. Serie monografică. Paideia Publishing.

Parr, T., & Friston, K. J. (2018). The Anatomy of Inference: Generative Models and Brain Structure. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 12, 90.

Râmbu, N. (1997). Studiu introductiv la Leibniz, G. W. Eseuri de teodicee. Polirom Publishing.

Richards, B. A., & Lillicrap, T. P. (2022). The Brain-Computer Metaphor Debate Is Useless: A Matter of Semantics. Frontiers in Computer Science, 4, 810358.

Russell, B. [1992] (2005). The Philosophy of Leibniz. Routledge.

Safron, A. (2020) An Integrated World Modeling Theory (IWMT) of Consciousness: Combining Integrated Information and Global Neuronal Workspace Theories With the Free Energy Principle and Active Inference Framework; Toward Solving the Hard Problem and Characterizing Agentic Causation. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 3, 30.

Safron, A. (2022). Integrated world modeling theory expanded: Implications for the future of consciousness. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 16, 642397.

Safron, A., Klimaj, V., & Hipólito, I. (2022). On the Importance of Being Flexible: Dynamic Brain Networks and Their Potential Functional Significances. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 15, 688424.




How to Cite

Cucu, M. ., & Lenţa, O. . (2023). The Ethics of Monadic Identity in Leibniz’s Thought. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 14(1), 535-553.

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now