Antinomicity of the Good-Truth-Beauty Triad on the Internet

Authors

  • Oksana V. Onyshchuk Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine
  • Olesia V. Pankiv
  • Maria V. Sinelnikova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/14.1/429

Keywords:

good, evil, truth, lie, beautiful, social media, social network

Abstract

The presented article outlines vectors of transformation of basic values of Good-Truth-Beauty in the network. The epistemological, moral-ethical, and aesthetic aspects are offered, which allows revealing the forms of representation of initial values in the Internet culture. In particular, the planes of the intersection of the axes “good/evil”, “truth/lie”, and “beautiful/ugly” in social media are presented. The authors are concerned about the assertion of equivalence and blurring of the boundaries between good and evil, which can lead to permissiveness that is covered by anonymity, symbolism, and nominalisation provided by social networks. The article explores the articulation of the problem of evil in the Internet through the use of the heuristic potential of aesthetic experience. An analysis of modern aesthetic forms of the representation of evil in network culture through the prism of such basic values as Goodness-Truth-Beauty is carried out. It is shown how these values are deformed and sometimes turn into their opposite with the help of aesthetic means. It is shown that modern propaganda, which is carried out in social networks, actively uses existential features of perception and experience of truth. In the course of the study, the opinion is substantiated that reflexive judgment allows to attract aesthetic means to the moral understanding of manifestations of evil in the absence of stable standards and moral guidelines in social networks.

Author Biographies

Oksana V. Onyshchuk, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine

Assoc. Prof. PhD, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Department of Philosophy, S. Bandera Street, 12, 79013 Lviv, Ukraine, ORCID: 0000-0002-8064-1953

Olesia V. Pankiv

Assoc. Prof. PhD, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Department of Philosophy, S. Bandera Street, 12, 79013 Lviv, Ukraine, ORCID: 0000-0003-2081-4792

Maria V. Sinelnikova

Assoc. Prof. PhD, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Department of Philosophy, S. Bandera Street, 12, 79013 Lviv, Ukraine, ORCID 0000-0001-6085-6087

References

Arendt, H. (1968). Truth and politics. Between Past and Future, 227-64. https://idanlandau.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/arendt-truth-and-politics.pdf

Ayto, J. (2005). Word origins: The secret histories of english words from A to Z. A&C Black.

Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. UMP. http://cast.b-ap.net/arc619f17/wp-content/uploads/sites/39/2017/08/Baudrillard-SimulacraSimulation.pdf

de Berg, O.H. (2011). War as aesthetic: The philosophy of carl von clausewitz as the embodiment of John Dewey’s concept of experience. Texas A&M University. http://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2011-08-9773/DEBERG-DISSERTATION.pdf?sequence=2

Brossat, A., & Déotte, J.-L. (2000). L`époque de la disparition: Politique et esthétique (Esthétiques). L'Harmattan.

Cherniss, H. (1954). The sources of evil according to Plato. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. American Philosophical Society. https://cds.cern.ch/record/96416/files/CERN-ARCH-PMC-06-359.pdf

Floridi, L., & Sanders, J.W. (2001). Artificial evil and the foundation of computer ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 3, 55-66. DOI:10.1023/A:1011440125207

Groys, B. (2003). The art of utopia. [In Russian]. Art magazine.

Groys, B. (2015). On the New. An attemp at cultural economy. [In Russian]. Ad Marginem.

Hegel, G.W.F. (2010). The science of logic. Cambridge University Press. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/58d6b5ff86e6c087a92f8f89/t/5913a3bb197aeab3e23ff4d3/1494459337924/Georg_Wilhelm_Friedrich_Hegel__The_Science_of_Logic.pdf

Hübner, B. (1996). Beliebigkeitsethos und Zwangsästhetik. Passagen-Verlag.

Lash, S. (2002). Critique of information. Sage Publications. DOI:10.1080/01972240490423094

Nichols, T. (2017). The death of еxpertise: the сampaign аgainst еstablished кnowledge and why it matters. Oxford University Press. https://dmpi.pasca.radenintan.ac.id/wpcontent/uploads/sites/14/2018/11/The-Death-of-Expertise.pdf

Oxford English Dictionary (OED). (2021). Oxford University Press.

Petrushenko, V. (2009). Explanatory dictionary of basic philosophical terms [In Ukrainian]. Lviv Polytechnic Publishing House

Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary (FED). (2002). Abrys. https://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Shynkaruk_Volodymyr/Filosofskyi_entsyklopedychnyi_slovnyk.pdf

Svendsen, L. (2010). Philosophy of Evil (Norwegian Literature). Dalkey Archive Press.

Weibel, P. (2011). 10 ++ program texts for possible worlds [In Russian]. https://off-university.livejournal.com/16525.html

Welsch, W. (1997). Aesthetics beyond Aesthetics. Proceedings of the XІIth International Congress of Aesthetics, Lahti 1995, Vol. ІІІ: Practical Aesthetics in Practice and Theory, ed. Martti Honkanen, Helsinki, 18-37. https://rucforsk.ruc.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/51734224/_Aesthetics_Beyond_Aesthetics_by_Wolfgang_Welsch.pdf

Zimbardo, P. (2017). The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. Random house.

Žižek, S. (2005). The metastases of enjoyment: six essays on woman and causality. Verso.

Žižek, S. (2013). Welcome to the desert of the real: Five essays on September 11 and related dates (Radical Thinkers). Verso.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-09

How to Cite

Onyshchuk, . O. V., Pankiv, O. V. ., & Sinelnikova, M. V. . (2023). Antinomicity of the Good-Truth-Beauty Triad on the Internet. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 14(1), 445-460. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/14.1/429

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now