Social Construction of a Pandemic. Medicalization of Social Life - Anxiety, Frustration and Ethical Risks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/14.2/450Keywords:
pandemics, social construction, anxiety, frustrationAbstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the social construction process of the Covid-19 pandemic from the perspective of the anxiety and frustration felt by the citizens as a threat to their own lives and health and to analyze the perceived severity of the Covid-19 infection during March-June 2020. The present research aims to understand the changes that society is going through in the context of the pandemic, to analyze the social construction elements of the pandemic and the infodemic, in the context of a public health crisis, and also to identify the social perception on the pandemic among the affected population.
Social anxiety can be understood: as a side effect of the process of social construction of the person's identity, thus being correlated with the cultural particularities of the social environment of origin, mainly related to the social distinctions between individualism and collectivism; as an instance for the social construction of the idea of pandemic; as a constructive instance for the medicalization of social life in the pandemic and post-pandemic period; as being socially constructed through the mechanisms of the interpretive adrift of the meaning of role performance.
The research was carried out between March and June 2020 and it was based on a qualitative methodology derived from Grounded Theory. Data collection was done through the technique of a semi-structured interview, applied online on a sample of 103 people, mostly in the N.E. Region of Romania using an opportunity sample based on the snowball method.
References
Adam, S. (2009). Profesia de cadru didactic între reprezentare socială şi vocaţie individuală [The teaching profession between social representation and individual vocation]. Revista de Cercetare în Ştiinţe ale Educaţiei [Journal of Research in Education Sciences]. http://www.rcsedu.info/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=17:profesia-de-cadru-didactic-intre-reprezentare-social-i-vocaie-individual&catid=10:sociologia-educaiei-
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage.
Conrad, P. (2007). The Medicalization of Society: On the transformation of Human Conditions into Treatable Disorders.The John Hopkins University Press.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions (2nd ed.), Sage Publications.
Dingwall, R., Hoffman, L., & Staniland, K. (2013). Introduction. Why a sociology of pandemics?. In R. Dingwall, L. M. Hoffman, & K. Staniland (eds.), Pandemics and Emerging Infectious Diseases. The Sociological Agenda (pp. 1-7). Wiley-Blackwell.
Ekberg, M. (2007). The Parameters of the Risk Society: A Review and Exploration. Current Sociology, 55(3), 343–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392107076080
Fesmire, W. T. (2021). The Social Construction of COVID-19 Through Historical Comparisons to SARS and Other Epidemics in News Media Coverage, 2021[Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Vanderbilt Universitty.
Goulding, C. (1999). Grounded Theory: Some Reflections on Paradigm, Procedures and Misconceptions. In K. Gilbert (Ed.), Working Paper Series, Wolverhampton Business School, Management Research Centre (pp. 5-25). University of Wolverhampton. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.116.3233&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Habermas, J. (1985). The Theory of Communicative Action, Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Beacon Press.
Oliver-Smith, A. (2022). The Social Construction of Disaster: Economic Anthropological Perspectives on the COVID-19 Pandemic. Economic Anthropology, 9(1), 167-171. https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12236
Pfister, S. M. (2020). Theorising - the Social Definition of the corona Pandemic. Pandemic (Im)Possibilities, 1(45). https://www.europeansociology.org/european-sociologist/issue/45/discussion/f172f619-bb73-4d07-a6c5-8c31cc6dec83
Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2013). Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Person Clinical. http://images.pearsonclinical.com/images/assets/basc3/basc3resources/DSM5_DiagnosticCriteria_GeneralizedAnxietyDisorder.pdf
Salari, N., Hosseinian-Far, A., Jalali, R., Vaisi-Raygani, A., Rasoulpoor, S., Mohammadi, M., Rasoulpoor, S., & Khaledi-Paveh, B. (2020). Prevalence of Stress, Anxiety, Depression Among the General Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Globalization and Health, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00589-w
Sandu, A. (2010). Freedom as a Hermeneutical Pretext. Revista Românească pentru Educaţie Multidimensională, 2(3), 5-24. https://revistaromaneasca.ro/freedom-as-a-hermeneutical-pretext/
Sandu, A. (2020). Bioethics in Crisis or a Crisis of Bioethics? An Anthropology of the Pandemic in the Medicalized Society. Lumen.
Strong, P. (1990). Epidemic psychology. A model. Sociology of Health and Illness, 12, 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347150
Williams, S. J., & Calnan, M. (1996). The ‘Limits’ of Medicalization?: Modern Medicine and the Lay Populace In ‘Late’ Modernity”. Social Science and Medicine, 42(12), 1609-1620. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00313-4
Yeomans, L., & Bowman, S. (2021). Internal crisis communication and the social construction of emotion: university leaders' sensegiving discourse during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Communication Management, 25(3), 196-213, https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-11-2020-0130
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
