Social Construction of a Pandemic. Medicalization of Social Life - Anxiety, Frustration and Ethical Risks

Authors

  • Antonio Sandu Professor PhD. in Sociology, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania; PhD Student in Law, Titu Maiorescu University of Bucharest, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/14.2/450

Keywords:

pandemics, social construction, anxiety, frustration

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the social construction process of the Covid-19 pandemic from the perspective of the anxiety and frustration felt by the citizens as a threat to their own lives and health and to analyze the perceived severity of the Covid-19 infection during March-June 2020. The present research aims to understand the changes that society is going through in the context of the pandemic, to analyze the social construction elements of the pandemic and the infodemic, in the context of a public health crisis, and also to identify the social perception on the pandemic among the affected population.

Social anxiety can be understood: as a side effect of the process of social construction of the person's identity, thus being correlated with the cultural particularities of the social environment of origin, mainly related to the social distinctions between individualism and collectivism; as an instance for the social construction of the idea of pandemic; as a constructive instance for the medicalization of social life in the pandemic and post-pandemic period; as being socially constructed through the mechanisms of the interpretive adrift of the meaning of role performance.

The research was carried out between March and June 2020 and it was based on a qualitative methodology derived from Grounded Theory. Data collection was done through the technique of a semi-structured interview, applied online on a sample of 103 people, mostly in the N.E. Region of Romania using an opportunity sample based on the snowball method.

References

Adam, S. (2009). Profesia de cadru didactic între reprezentare socială şi vocaţie individuală [The teaching profession between social representation and individual vocation]. Revista de Cercetare în Ştiinţe ale Educaţiei [Journal of Research in Education Sciences]. http://www.rcsedu.info/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=17:profesia-de-cadru-didactic-intre-reprezentare-social-i-vocaie-individual&catid=10:sociologia-educaiei-

Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage.

Conrad, P. (2007). The Medicalization of Society: On the transformation of Human Conditions into Treatable Disorders.The John Hopkins University Press.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions (2nd ed.), Sage Publications.

Dingwall, R., Hoffman, L., & Staniland, K. (2013). Introduction. Why a sociology of pandemics?. In R. Dingwall, L. M. Hoffman, & K. Staniland (eds.), Pandemics and Emerging Infectious Diseases. The Sociological Agenda (pp. 1-7). Wiley-Blackwell.

Ekberg, M. (2007). The Parameters of the Risk Society: A Review and Exploration. Current Sociology, 55(3), 343–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392107076080

Fesmire, W. T. (2021). The Social Construction of COVID-19 Through Historical Comparisons to SARS and Other Epidemics in News Media Coverage, 2021[Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Vanderbilt Universitty.

Goulding, C. (1999). Grounded Theory: Some Reflections on Paradigm, Procedures and Misconceptions. In K. Gilbert (Ed.), Working Paper Series, Wolverhampton Business School, Management Research Centre (pp. 5-25). University of Wolverhampton. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.116.3233&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Habermas, J. (1985). The Theory of Communicative Action, Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Beacon Press.

Oliver-Smith, A. (2022). The Social Construction of Disaster: Economic Anthropological Perspectives on the COVID-19 Pandemic. Economic Anthropology, 9(1), 167-171. https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12236

Pfister, S. M. (2020). Theorising - the Social Definition of the corona Pandemic. Pandemic (Im)Possibilities, 1(45). https://www.europeansociology.org/european-sociologist/issue/45/discussion/f172f619-bb73-4d07-a6c5-8c31cc6dec83

Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2013). Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Person Clinical. http://images.pearsonclinical.com/images/assets/basc3/basc3resources/DSM5_DiagnosticCriteria_GeneralizedAnxietyDisorder.pdf

Salari, N., Hosseinian-Far, A., Jalali, R., Vaisi-Raygani, A., Rasoulpoor, S., Mohammadi, M., Rasoulpoor, S., & Khaledi-Paveh, B. (2020). Prevalence of Stress, Anxiety, Depression Among the General Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Globalization and Health, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00589-w

Sandu, A. (2010). Freedom as a Hermeneutical Pretext. Revista Românească pentru Educaţie Multidimensională, 2(3), 5-24. https://revistaromaneasca.ro/freedom-as-a-hermeneutical-pretext/

Sandu, A. (2020). Bioethics in Crisis or a Crisis of Bioethics? An Anthropology of the Pandemic in the Medicalized Society. Lumen.

Strong, P. (1990). Epidemic psychology. A model. Sociology of Health and Illness, 12, 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347150

Williams, S. J., & Calnan, M. (1996). The ‘Limits’ of Medicalization?: Modern Medicine and the Lay Populace In ‘Late’ Modernity”. Social Science and Medicine, 42(12), 1609-1620. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00313-4

Yeomans, L., & Bowman, S. (2021). Internal crisis communication and the social construction of emotion: university leaders' sensegiving discourse during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Communication Management, 25(3), 196-213, https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-11-2020-0130

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Sandu , A. . (2023). Social Construction of a Pandemic. Medicalization of Social Life - Anxiety, Frustration and Ethical Risks. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 14(2), 165-197. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/14.2/450

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now