The Significance of the Rome Ii Regulation in the Unification Process of the European Union

Authors

  • Oksana RUDENKO Associate Professor of the Department of European and Comparative Law, Candidate of Juridical Sciences, PhD (Law Science) of Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

Keywords:

Non-contractual obligations, European Union, the harmonization of the rules on applicable law in the EU, Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union N 864/2007 of July 11, 2007

Abstract

Legislative activity of the European Union (EU) came close to embodying the idea of creating the EU Code of Private Law, although traditionally questions of private international law have always been within the scope of regulation of national legislation. The work on the unification of the rules on applicable law in the EU is currently being carried out in such activities of the EU Council and the EU Commission as: 1) the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I - Regulation of 2008); 2) the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II - Regulation of 2007); 3) the law applicable to the issues of divorce and separation of spouses (Rome III - Regulation of 2010); 4) the law applicable to inheritance issues (Rome IV - Regulation of 2012). The law applicable to non-contractual obligations is defined in the EU member states under Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11.07.2007 “On the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (“Rome II ”)” (hereinafter referred to as “Rome II”). The use of uniform rules was intended to increase the predictability of court decisions and to ensure a reasonable balance between the interests of the person held responsible and the person who was harmed. The provisions of the "Rome II" Regulation are applied in situations containing conflicting laws to noncontractual obligations in the civil and commercial sphere and do not apply to tax, customs and administrative disputes, as well as to the responsibility of the state for actions and inaction committed during the exercise of public authority. A number of other issues are also excluded from the scope of the provisions of the Regulation. The Regulation sets a general rule for the choice of an applicable law: the law applicable to a non-contractual obligation arising from harm is the law of the country where the damage occurs, but there are some exceptions to this rule. Summing up, it should be noted that at present the EU legislation on applicable law cannot be called consistent and logical. Many legal rules in different regulations repeat each other, thereby increasing the amount of legislative material, which adversely affects the principle of accessibility of justice. Long and painstaking work is needed to improve the EU legislation in the field of the international private law, in particular, the preparation by the EU Commission of Green Books on various aspects of the international private law.

References

. Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II) OJ 2007 L 199/40 (Rome II Regulation). Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32007R0864

. Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980 / Consolidated version CF 498Y0126(03) // OJ L 266, 9.10; 1980: 1–19. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A41980A0934

. Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters // OJ L 12, 16.1.2001: 1–23. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32001R0044

. Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters // OJ L 351, 20.12.2012: 1–32. Special edition in Croatian: Chapter 19, Volume 011: 289-320. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32012R1215

. Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) // OJ L 177, 4.7.2008: 6–16. Special edition in Croatian: Chapter 19, Volume 006; 109 – 119. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32008R0593

. Vynohradov A.A. «Rym I» i «Rym II» - pytannya vybora? Dostupno z. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/…/n/rim-i-i-rim-ii-voprosvybora.pdf

. Zhang M. Party Autonomy in Non-Contractual Obligations: Rome II and its Impacts on Choice of Law (February 14, 2009). Seton Hall Law Review, Vol. 39, 2009; Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009-15. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1343002

. Dickinson A. The Rome II Regulation: the law applicable to noncontractual obligations: updating supplement, Oxford private international law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010: 180.

. Dornis T. The Doctrines of Contract and Negotiorum Gestio in European Private Law: Quest for Structure in a No Man's Land of Legal Reasoning (June 22, 2017). Restitution Law Review; 2015: 73-91. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2991164 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2991164 Novoa R. Culpa in contrahendo: a comparative law study: Chilean law and the United Nations Convention on contracts for the international sale of goods (CISG) // Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2005, pp. 583-612.

. Kramer XE. The Rome II Regulation on the Law Applicable to NonContractual Obligations: The European Private International Law Tradition Continued - Introductory Observations, Scope, System, and General Rules (October 15, 2008). Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht (NIPR); 2008, 4: 414-424. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1314749

. Toshchenko IO. Rolʹ Rehlamentuvannya «Rym II» u klasyfikatsiyi mizhnarodnoho pryvatnoho prava v YES // Derzhava i pravo, Vypusk, 2011; 53: 617-620.

. Symeonides, SC. Rome II and Tort Conflicts: A Missed opportunity. Symeonides American Journal of Comparative Law; 2008, 56. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1031803

Downloads

Published

2019-09-26

How to Cite

RUDENKO, O. (2019). The Significance of the Rome Ii Regulation in the Unification Process of the European Union. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 6(1), 51-63. Retrieved from https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/ejlpa/article/view/1575