Legal Characteristics of Mediation
Keywords:
Mediation, legal characteristics of mediation, excess of human autonomy, human needs in the benefits, exchange of benefits between people, legal nature of mediation.Abstract
The article on the methodological positions of the anthropo-sociocultural approach, especially its components such as practical philosophy and material phenomenology, which are the most effective tools for perception of such an "invisible thing as the area of intersubjectivity", by M. Anri, deals with the analytic investigation of legal characteristics of mediation as an innovative method, alternative to justice, of solving interpersonal conflicts. It is substantiated that the legal characteristics of mediation are the product of both existential properties of a person and the existential arrangement of the human world. A general list of personality traits is supplemented by a provision on the attributive affiliation of human needs in benefits. It is proved that the unconditional exchange of benefits between people inevitably transforms the excess of human autonomy, being actualized in the communicative solidarity of people, and generates intrapersonal and interpersonal contradictions and conflicts. The conditional exchange of benefits between people, for its part, makes such conflicts total and especially dangerous for the existence of individuals.
It is proved that mediation has a double legal nature as, firstly, it is the product of the basic (need) method of coexistence of individuals in society, and secondly, it is a system of interrelated legal obligations between them, through which a reconciled social environment is formed. On this basis mediation can be defined as mutual legal self-defense of individuals.
References
Dyrektyva No 2008/52/JeS Jevropejsjkogho parlamentu i Rady pro dejaki aspekty poserednyctva (mediaciji) v cyviljnykh ta komercijnykh spravakh [Directive No. 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters]. Available at: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_a95.
Burova L. Pravova pryroda mediatsiinoi uhody (The legal nature of the mediation agreement); 2015, 18: 56
Yosypenko S. Poniattia ta osoblyvosti pravovoi pryrody mediatsii (Concept and features of the legal nature of mediation); 2015, 3: 89;
Vozniuk N. Pryntsypy alternatyvnykh sposobiv vyrishennia hospodarsko-pravovykh sporiv (Principles of alternative ways of resolving economic legal disputes); 2013, 11: 373
Kiselevova T. Pravove rehuliuvannia vidnosyn iz nadannia posluh mediatsii u zarubizhnykh krainakh (Legal regulation of relations for the provision of mediation services in foreign countries); 2011, 11- 12: 225.
Alexander N. The mediation metamodel: Understanding practice, Conflict Resolution Quarterly; 2008, 26 (1): 97-123.
Baruck Bush RA., Folger JP. The promise of mediation: The transformative approach to conflict, San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons; 2004: 304.
Fuller LL. Mediation – its forms and functions, Southern California Law Review; 1970, 44(2): 305-339.
Menkel-Meadow CJ, Porter-Love L. Mediation: Practice, policy, and ethics, 2nd edition. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business; 2014: 672.
Menkel-Meadow CJ. The Many Ways of Mediation: The Transformation of Traditions, Ideologies, Paradigms, and Practices, Negotiation Journal; 1995, Vol. 11: 217-241.
Menkel-Meadow CJ. The trouble with the adversary system in a postmodern, multicultural world, William & Mary Law Review; 1996, Vol. 38: 5-44.
Milner N. Mediation and political theory: A critique of Bush and Folger, Law & Social Inquiry; 1996, vol. 21 (3): 737-759.
Winkle JV. Mediation: A Path back for the Lost Lawyer, American Bar Association; 2004: 140.
Henry M. Phenomenologie materielle. 1ere ed. Presses Universitaires de France, Epimethee; 1990 : 179.
Lebedev A.V. Protagor [Protagoras], Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya. Tom tretiy, Moskva: Mysl ; 2010.
Havrylyuk R.A. Metodologicheskaya traditsiya doktriny estestvennogo prava [Methodological tradition of the docrine of natural law], Chernovtsy, 2012.
Rench T. Konstytutsiya moral'nosti. Transtsendental'na antropolohiya i praktychna filosofiya [Constitution of morality. Transcendental anthropology and practical philosophy], Kyiv; 2010.
Maslou AG. Motivatsiya i lichnost [Motivation and Personality], Sankt Peterburg:Yevraziya; 1999: 478.
Rubinshteyn SL. Osnovy obshchey psikhologii [Fundamentals of General Psychology], Moskva: Uchpedgiz; 1946.
Berezhnoy NM. Chelovek i ego potrebnosti [Human and his needs], Moskva: Forum; 2000.
Samsin AI. Sotsialno-filosofskie problemy issledovaniya potrebnostey [Socio-philosophical problems in researching of needs], Moskva: Vyssh. Shkola; 1987.
Smit A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov [Research about the nature and the reasons of riches of the people], Moscow; 2007.
Bekker G. Ekonomicheskiy analiz i chelovecheskoe povedenie [Economic analysis and human behavior], Teoriya i istoriya ekonomicheskikh i sotsialnykh institutov i sistem (Almanakh), Moskva: Nachala-press, 1993, pp. 24-40.
Nort D. Instituty i ekonomicheskiy rost: istoricheskoe vvedenie [Institutions and economic growth: a historic introduction], Teoriya i istoriya ekonomicheskikh i sotsialnykh institutov i sistem (Almanakh), Moskva: Nachala-press, 1993, pp. 69-91.
Alchian AA. Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory, Journal of Political Economy; 1950, No. 58; 211-221.
Buchanan JМ. The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan, Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1975: 210.
Brunner K. The Perception of Man and the Conception of Society: Two Approaches to Understanding Society, Economic Inquiry; 1987, Vol. 25: 367–388.
Brunner K., Meckling WH. The Perception of Man and the Conception of Government, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking; 1977, 9 (1): 60-85.
Brunner K., Meltzer AH. The Uses of Money: Money in the Theory of an Exchange, American Economic Review; 1971, 61, (5): 784-805.
Meckling WH. Values and the Choice of the Model of the Individual in the Social Sciences (REMM), Schweizerische Zeitschriftfür Volkswirtschaft und Statistik; 1976, 4: 545-560.
Lindenberg S. An Assessment of the New Political Economy: Its Potential for the Social Sciences and for Sociology in Particular, Sociological Theory; 1985, 3 (1): 99-114.
Barrash D. The Whisperings Within, New York: Harper and Row; 1979.
Hayek FA. Pagubnaya samonadeyannost. Oshibki sotsializma [The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism], Moskva: Novosti; 1992: 304.
Grechko PK., Kurmelevoy Ye M. Sotsialnoe: istoki, strukturnye profili, sovremennye vyzovy [Social: sources, structural profiles, modern challenges], Moskva: ROSSPEN, 2009.
Messner J. Naturrecht, Innsbruck, Wein, München: Tirolia, 1958.
Baumeister A. Buttia i blaho [Existence and Good], Vinnytsia; 2014.
Pirs Ch.S. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya [Selected philosophical works], Moskva: Logos; 2000.
Kant I. Grundlegung Zur Metaphysik der Sitten, Stuttgart: Meiner; 1999.
Ferber R. Philosophische Grundbegriffe 1. Eine Einführung, München: Beck; 2008.
H'offe O. Transtsendental'nyy obmin – fihura lehitymatsiyi prav lyudyny? [Transcendental exchange – a figure of legitimation of human rights?], Filosofiia prav liudyny, Kyiv; 2008: 32-47.
Koulman PT. Rezultatyvnyi konfliktv [Effective conflict], Kyiv: Nash Format; 2016: 320
. North DC, Wallis JJ, Barry R. Weingast, Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009
Raynakh A. Apriornye osnovaniya grazhdanskogo prava [Aprioristic bases of civil law], Raynakh A. In: Sobranie sochineniy, Moscow; 2001.
Fuller L. Moral prava [The morality of law], Kyiv: Sfera; 1999: 232.
Khayek F.A. Pravo, zakonodatelstvo i svoboda: sovremennoe ponimanie liberalnykh printsipov spravedlivosti i politiki [Law, Legislation and Liberty: A new statement of the liberal principles of justice and policy], Moskva: М.: IRISEN; 2006: 643.
Malakhov V. Svoboda yak nevymushenist [Freedom as unconstraint], Pravo buty soboju, Kyiv: Dukh i Litera; 2008.
Moss M. Obshchestva. Obmen. Lichnost. Trudy po sotsialnoy antropologii [Society. Exchange. Personality. Works on social anthropology], Moskva; 2011: 416.
Malinowski B. Grime and Customi Savage Society, London; 1926.
Malinovskiy B. Magiya i religiya [Magic and Religion], Religiya i obshchestvo: khrestomatiya po sotsialnoy religii, Moskva: Nauka; 1994: 241-258.
Marshak J. Elements for a Theory of Teams, Management Science; 1955, Vol. 1: 127-137.
Marshak J. Towards an Economic Theory of Organization and Information, Decision Processes, New York: John Wiley; 1954: 187- 220.
Marshak J. Efficient and Viable Organization Forms, Modern Organization Theory, New York: John Wiley; 1959: 307-320.
Radner R. Application of Linear Programming to Team Decision Problems, Management Science; 1959, V (1): 143-150.
Radner R. Team Decision Problems. Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 1962; XXXIII (9): 857-881.
McGuire J. Some Team Models of a Sales Organization, Management Science; 1961, VII (1): 101-130.
Morgenstern O. Prolegomena to a Theory of Organization, Research Memorandum no. 734, Santa Monica, Calif: RAND; 1951.
March JG. Simon H.A. The Organizations, New York: John Wiley; 1958.
Boulding K. The Organizational Revolution, New York: Harper; 1953.
Olson M. Loghika kolektyvnoji diji: Suspiljni blagha i teorija ghrup [Logic of collective action: Public goods and group theory], Kyiv: Libra; 2004.
Cyviljno-procesualjnyj kodeks Ukrajiny [Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine]. Available at: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618- 15/paran6188#n6188
Kryminaljno-procesualjnyj kodeks Ukrajiny [Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine]. Available at: http://zakon5.rada.gov.
Kodeks administratyvnogho sudochynstva Ukrajiny [Code of Administrative Justice of Ukraine]. Available at: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15 .
Ignătescu C. Abuzul de drept. Iasi, Romania: Editura Lumen; 2013.
Postanova Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy «Pro pryiniattia za osnovu proektu Zakonu Ukrainy pro mediatsiiu» [Resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine «On the Adoption of the Draft Law of Ukraine on the Mediation»]. Available at: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1725-19.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in European Journal of Law and Public Administration.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
EJLPA Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
