Socio-Legal Aspects Regarding the Institution of Adoption

Authors

  • Dumitrita FLOREA Lecturer PhD, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania
  • Narcisa GALES Lecturer PhD, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania
  • Loredana TEREC-VLAD PhD Candidate Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/7.1/117

Keywords:

Postmodernity, adoption, procedures, effects, kinship.

Abstract

In order to be able to analyze the institution of adoption, we must start from the definition of family. Although we live in an evolved society in which the priorities and accents are constantly changing, yet one of the most important things in our lives is still the family - the family in which we were born and raised, or the family we created. The notion of family can be viewed both from a sociological and legal point of view. In the sociological sense, the family, as a specific form of human community, designates the group of persons united by marriage, filiation or kinship, which are characterized by community of life, interests and mutual support. In this sense, it can be said that the family is a social reality through the community of life between spouses, parents and children, as well as other relatives. Within the family relations, moral, psychological, physiological and economic aspects appear between those who form the community of life and the interests. Family relationships have a character of complexity that we do not find in other categories of social relations. In the legal sense, the family designates the group of persons between whom there are rights and obligations, which arise from marriage, kinship, as well as from other relations assimilated to family relationships. In this sense, the family is a legal reality, by its regulation by law.

References

Apostu I. Familia romaneasca - evolutie sociala ai provocari contemporane. Bucuresti: Editura Tritonic; 2016.

Baias FA, Avram M, Nicolescu C. Modificarile aduse Codului familiei prin Legea nr. 288/2007, in Dreptul nr. 3; 2008, p. 9-41

Cucu M-C, Lenta OE. A Few Jungian Observations on the Psychological Dynamics of the Couple, Postmodern Openings, 9(1):35-44.

Frunza S. From Metaphisical Desire to the Desire of Bein Desired: an Introduction to Aurel Cooban’s Hermeneuthics of Love, Transylvanian Review. 2018; 27(3): 112-127.

Frunză S. Ethical leadership, religion and personal development in the context of global crisis, Journal for the study of Religions and Ideologies. 2017; 16 (46): 3-16.

Ignatescu C. Letter and Spirit of the Law- an Interpretation based on Principles of Law, Revista Româneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala. 2013; 5(2): 75-82.

Ignatescu C. Interpretation of the Legal Norm. Applications of the Principle Ubi Lex Non Distinguit, Nec Nos Distinguere Debemus. European Journal of Law and Public Administration. 2017; 4 (2): 41-49.

Ionascu T. De la adopțiune la infierea instituita prin Decretul nr. 182 din 19 octombrie 1951, în Justiția nouă nr. 7-8; 1951.

Lipovetsky G. A treia femeie. Bucuresti:Editura Univers; 2000.

Popescu R. Introducere in sociologia familiei. Iasi: Editura Politom; 2009.

Lupascu D, Craciunescu CM. Dreptul familiei în noul Cod Civil. București: Ed. UJ; 2012.

Pavaleanu V. Reglementarea adoptiei prin norme interne și conventii internationale, in Dreptul nr. 9; 1998.

Popescu R. Introducere in sociologia familiei. Iasi: Editura Polirom; 2009.

Parlamentul Romaniei. Legea 273/2004, privind procedura adoptiei. Publicata in Monitorul Oficial nr. 739 din 23 septembrie 2016.

Vlad L. The Family, Where to? From the "Solid" Perspective to "Liquid" Perspective, Postmodern Openings. 2017; l 8(1): 67-80.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-31

How to Cite

FLOREA, D., GALES, N., & TEREC-VLAD, L. (2020). Socio-Legal Aspects Regarding the Institution of Adoption. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 7(1), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/7.1/117

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>