Providing of Reasonableness in Decisions of the Constitutional Court in the Scope of Recognition of the Echr’s Decisions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/7.2/122Keywords:
Constitutional state, legal positivism, interpretation, law justification, constitutional argument, legislative, constitutional judgeAbstract
The relevance of the study of judicial reasoning in public law is related to the challenges of modern litigation, which require new approaches to the construction of a court decision. This is also due to the constitutional reform in Ukraine, in particular the latest amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine in the field of justice. The emergence of the priority issue of constitutionality led to the rupture of the system, where the protection of fundamental rights in a particular issue was essentially ensured in accordance with the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. The Constitutional Court of Ukraine always uses the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights to form its own legal positions, after which they actually become a substantive element of the motivating part of the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. It is concluded that regardless of whether the decision of the European Court of Human Rights has been ruled on Ukraine or not, it is a source of constitutional law of Ukraine.
References
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2012). On the Fulfillment of Decisions and Application of Practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Legislation of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3477-15?lang=en#Text
Shevchuk, C. (2011). Consistency of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. Bulletin of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, 4-5, 128.
Ismailov, K. Y. (2011). The impact of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights on the system of sources of law of Ukraine. State and law, 51, 75-80.
Romboli, R. (2008). Aggiornamenti in tema di processo costituzionale (2005-2007). Giappichelli. 44 p.
Ruggeri, A. (2012). La Corte costituzionale “equilibrista”, tra continuità e innovazione, sul filo dei rapporti con la Corte EDU. Consulta On Line. https://www.giurcost.org/studi/ruggeri9.htm
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2020a). Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on June 11, 2020 (No. 7-р/2020). Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Legislation of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v007p710-20#Text
Infotropic Media. (2018). Selected decisions of the German Constitutional Court. Infotropic Media. 1028 p. p. 799.
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2020b). Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on October 27, 2020 (No. 13-р/2020). Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Legislation of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v013p710-20#Text
Ruiz-Mateos, C. (1993-1994). Espagne, 23 juin 1993 (No. 12952/87), AJDA 1994. 16, Chron. J. -F. Flauss.
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2017). Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on November 23, 2017 (№ 1-р/2017). Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Legislation of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v001p710-17#Text
Corte Europea dei Diritti dell'Uomo. (2011). Sentenza della Corte Europea dei Diritti dell'Uomo del 18 marzo 2011 - Ricorso (No. 30814/06). Lautsi e altri c. Italia. https://www.giustizia.it/giustizia/it/mg_1_20_1.page?facetNode_1=0_8_1_14&contentId=SDU647659&previsiousPage=mg_1_20
European Court of Human Rights. (1992). Affaire Open door et Dublin well Woman c. Irlande Requête (No. 14234/88; 14235/88). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{"itemid":["001-62346"]}
Kapardis, A. (2008). The European Arrest Warrant (EAW) in Cyprus and Constitutional Concerns, In AA. VV., The European Arrest Warrant and its Implementation in the Member States of the European Union. Wydawnictwo C. H. BECK, Varsovia, 19.
Martinico, G., & Pollicino, O. (Eds.). (2010). The national judicial treatment of the ECHR and EU laws: a comparative constitutional perspective. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing. 156 p.
Pollicino, O. (2010). Allargamento dell'Europa a Est e rapporto tra Corti costituzionali e Corti europee. Verso una teoria generale dell'impatto interordinamentale del diritto sovranazionale? Giuffrè. p. 281.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences, Romania & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in European Journal of Law and Public Administration.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
EJLPA Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
