Providing of Reasonableness in Decisions of the Constitutional Court in the Scope of Recognition of the Echr’s Decisions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/7.2/122

Keywords:

Constitutional state, legal positivism, interpretation, law justification, constitutional argument, legislative, constitutional judge

Abstract

The relevance of the study of judicial reasoning in public law is related to the challenges of modern litigation, which require new approaches to the construction of a court decision. This is also due to the constitutional reform in Ukraine, in particular the latest amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine in the field of justice. The emergence of the priority issue of constitutionality led to the rupture of the system, where the protection of fundamental rights in a particular issue was essentially ensured in accordance with the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. The Constitutional Court of Ukraine always uses the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights to form its own legal positions, after which they actually become a substantive element of the motivating part of the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. It is concluded that regardless of whether the decision of the European Court of Human Rights has been ruled on Ukraine or not, it is a source of constitutional law of Ukraine.

Author Biography

Laura BZOVA, Chernivtsi National University, Ukraine

Postgraduate student of the Department of Procedural Law Chernivtsi National University, Ukraine, l.bzova@chnu.edu.ua; ORCID.org/0000-0003-3143-4904

References

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2012). On the Fulfillment of Decisions and Application of Practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Legislation of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3477-15?lang=en#Text

Shevchuk, C. (2011). Consistency of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. Bulletin of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, 4-5, 128.

Ismailov, K. Y. (2011). The impact of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights on the system of sources of law of Ukraine. State and law, 51, 75-80.

Romboli, R. (2008). Aggiornamenti in tema di processo costituzionale (2005-2007). Giappichelli. 44 p.

Ruggeri, A. (2012). La Corte costituzionale “equilibrista”, tra continuità e innovazione, sul filo dei rapporti con la Corte EDU. Consulta On Line. https://www.giurcost.org/studi/ruggeri9.htm

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2020a). Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on June 11, 2020 (No. 7-р/2020). Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Legislation of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v007p710-20#Text

Infotropic Media. (2018). Selected decisions of the German Constitutional Court. Infotropic Media. 1028 p. p. 799.

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2020b). Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on October 27, 2020 (No. 13-р/2020). Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Legislation of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v013p710-20#Text

Ruiz-Mateos, C. (1993-1994). Espagne, 23 juin 1993 (No. 12952/87), AJDA 1994. 16, Chron. J. -F. Flauss.

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2017). Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on November 23, 2017 (№ 1-р/2017). Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Legislation of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v001p710-17#Text

Corte Europea dei Diritti dell'Uomo. (2011). Sentenza della Corte Europea dei Diritti dell'Uomo del 18 marzo 2011 - Ricorso (No. 30814/06). Lautsi e altri c. Italia. https://www.giustizia.it/giustizia/it/mg_1_20_1.page?facetNode_1=0_8_1_14&contentId=SDU647659&previsiousPage=mg_1_20

European Court of Human Rights. (1992). Affaire Open door et Dublin well Woman c. Irlande Requête (No. 14234/88; 14235/88). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{"itemid":["001-62346"]}

Kapardis, A. (2008). The European Arrest Warrant (EAW) in Cyprus and Constitutional Concerns, In AA. VV., The European Arrest Warrant and its Implementation in the Member States of the European Union. Wydawnictwo C. H. BECK, Varsovia, 19.

Martinico, G., & Pollicino, O. (Eds.). (2010). The national judicial treatment of the ECHR and EU laws: a comparative constitutional perspective. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing. 156 p.

Pollicino, O. (2010). Allargamento dell'Europa a Est e rapporto tra Corti costituzionali e Corti europee. Verso una teoria generale dell'impatto interordinamentale del diritto sovranazionale? Giuffrè. p. 281.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-12

How to Cite

BZOVA, L. (2020). Providing of Reasonableness in Decisions of the Constitutional Court in the Scope of Recognition of the Echr’s Decisions. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 7(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/7.2/122

Issue

Section

International Law. European Law. Comparative Law.

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now