Simplified Legal Proceedings in the Administrative Proceedings of Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/7.2/137Keywords:
Summary procedure, procedural form, legal process, administrative justiceAbstract
This article examines a simplified proceedings in administrative proceedings of Ukraine, its concept, regulatory, procedural features. The purpose of this article is to clarify the procedural aspects and problems of simplified action proceedings in administrative judicial procedure of Ukraine based on the experience of European countries. According to the objectives of the study the study used a set of methods and scientific knowledge as theoretical and scientific. The comparative legal method was used for the analysis of foreign models of simplified administrative matters and made the generalization of such experience. Systemic structural method applied to determine the procedural conditions of the grounds the use of simplified action proceedings in administrative proceedings.
It is concluded that the Code of administrative proceedings of Ukraine contains a single mismatch and problematic aspects in terms of regulation of administrative matters under the rules of simplified action proceedings, in particular the duplication of regulations and partial inconsistency of their content. Such legislative regulation of the powers of the court fully consistent with the positions of the ECHR. It is therefore proposed to amend the Code of administrative proceedings of Ukraine, agreed with the practice of the European court of human rights.
References
Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain. Application no. 10590/83. (1988, December 6). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57429%22]}
Bilodida, I. K. (1977). Словник української мови: в 11 томах. АН УРСР. Інститут мовознавства. за ред. 1970-1980 [Dictionary of the Ukrainian language: in 11 volumes. USSR Academy of Sciences. Institute of Linguistics. in a row. 1970-1980]. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka. Vol. 8. p. 304.
Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz. (n.d.). Verwaltungsgerichtsordnung (VwGO). § 93a. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/vwgo/__93a.html
Case Axen v. Germany. Application no. 8273/78. Judgment. Strasbourg. (1983, December 8). https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/a2e436/pdf/
Case Ruiz-Mateos v. Spain. Application no. 12952/87. Judgment. Strasbourg. (1993, June 23). https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/1face9/pdf/
Code de justice administrative. Version consolidée au 1 novembre 2019. (2019). https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCode.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006070933
Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. (1981). Рекомендація № R (81) 7 Комітету Міністрів Ради Європи державам-членам щодо заходів, що полегшують доступ до правосуддя, ухваленої Комітетом Міністрів Ради Європи на 68 засіданні заступників міністрів 14 травня 1981 року. [Recommendation № R (81) 7 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states on measures to facilitate access to justice, adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe at the 68th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies on 14 May 1981.], https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_133
Decision sur la recevabilite de la requête No. 64336/01 présentée par Lino Carlos Valera Assalino contre le Portugal. (2002). http://echr.ketse.com/doc/64336.01-fr-20020425/
District Administrative Court of Kyiv. (2019). Ухвала Окружного адміністративного суду міста Києва від 04.04.2019 у справі №640/5617/19 [Decision of the District Administrative Court of Kyiv of April 4, 2019 in case №640 / 5617/19]. https://youcontrol.com.ua/catalog/court-document/76240795/
Kobylyansky, K. M. (2010). Право фізичної особи на судовий захист в адміністративному суді: дис. ... канд. юрид. наук [The right of an individual to judicial protection in an administrative court: dis. ... cand. lawyer. Science.]. Odessa. p. 194.
Kraska v. Switzerland. Application no. 13942/88. Judgment. Strasbourg. (1993, April 19). http://echr.ketse.com/doc/13942.88-en-19930419/view/
Kudla v. Poland. Requête no 30210/96. (2000). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22languageisocode%22:[%22FRE%22],%22appno%22:[%2230210/96%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-63471%22]}
Laguta, V. O. (2013). Критерії визначення розумних строків [Criteria for determining reasonable deadlines]. Law Forum. No 3. p. 331.
Ligazakon. (2017). Пояснювальна записка до проекту Закону України «Про внесення змін до Господарського процесуального кодексу України, Цивільного процесуального кодексу України, Кодексу адміністративного судочинства України та інших законодавчих актів» [Explanatory note to the draft Law of Ukraine "On Amendments to the Commercial Procedural Code of Ukraine, the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine and other legislative acts"]. http://search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/GH4T400A.html
Nedbaylo, P. E., & Gorsheneva, V. M. (1976). Юридическая процессуальная форма: теория и практика. Под общ. ред. П.Е. Недбайло и В. М. Горшенева [Legal procedural form: theory and practice. Under common. ed. P. E. Nedbaylo and V. M. Gorsheneva]. Law. Lit. p. 14.
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2005). Кодекс адміністративного судочинства України. Відомості Верховної Ради України (ВВР) [Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VVR)] No. 35-36, No. 37, p. 446. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15
Зразкові справи (аналітичний огляд). Огляд практики Верховного Суду. [Exemplary cases (analytical review). Review of the practice of the Supreme Court]. (2019). p. 15.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences, Romania & LUMEN Publishing House

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in European Journal of Law and Public Administration.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
EJLPA Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND