The Right to Non-Discrimination: Interpretive Practice of the Ecthr
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/7.2/124Keywords:
Human rights, non-discrimination, ECHR, methodology of ECtHR`s interpretation ECtHR's practiceAbstract
The article conducts a legal analysis of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights on the protection of the right to non-discrimination, which is a fundamental and general principle concerning human rights protection. During the period of functioning of the ECtHR, the Court has processed a huge amount of cases concerning violation of the right to equality and the inextricably linked principle of non-discrimination under Art. 14 and Art. 1 of Protocol № 12 of the ECHR. The evolution of the interpretation of the ECtHR shows the transformation of approaches to the interpretation of the right to non-discrimination. The court gradually began to expand the range of possible violations, from outright prohibition to the detection and the statement of indirect discrimination, and its decisions contributed to the normative formulations of the principle of non-discrimination in national systems and its gradual transformation from a purely declarative to a coherent effective mechanism of protection of discrimination victims and a mechanism of the approval of democracy, human dignity. The rule of law forms the central principle of interpretation of the Convention. A consensual investigation allows the ECHR to tie its decisions to the pace of change in national law, recognizing the political sovereignty of the respondent States and, at the same time, legitimizing its own decisions against them, adhering to the principles of a democratic state governed by the rule of law. The purpose of this article is to analyze peculiarities of the ECtHR's interpretive practice in cases concerning the right to non-discrimination.
References
Council of Europe. (1950). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols No. 11 and 14. Rome. European Treaty Series, No. 5. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT=005&CM=8&DF=27/07/2010&CL=ENG
Dromina-Voloc, N. V. (2020). The principle of non-discrimination in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Scientific works of National University Odesa Law Academy. http://search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/an_117/ed_2012_10_16/pravo1/T063477.html?pravo=1
European Court of Human Rights. (1985, May 28). Case of Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. United Kingdom (Application No. 9214/80; 9473/81; 9474/81). Judgment. Strasbourg. http://echr.ketse.com/doc/9214.80-9473.81-9474.81-en-19850528/
European Court of Human Rights. (2000, April 6). Case of Thlimmenos v. Greece (Application No. 34369/97). Judgment. Strasbourg. https://www.equalrightstrust.org/ertdocumentbank/Microsoft%20Word%20-%20Case%20of%20Thlimmenos%20v%20Greece%20_2_.pdf
European Court of Human Rights. (2001, August 4). Case of Hugh Jordan v. United Kingdom (Application No. 24746/94). Judgment. Strasbourg. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-59450&filename=001-59450.pdf
European Court of Human Rights. (2006a, February 7). Case of DH and Others v. The Czech Republic (Application No. 57325/00). Judgment. Strasbourg. https://www.refworld.org/cases,ECHR,469e020e2.html
European Court of Human Rights. (2006b, April 12). Case of Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (Application No. 65731/01 and 65900/01). Judgment. Strasbourg. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-70087&filename=001-70087.pdf
European Court of Human Rights. (2007, May 3). Case of Baczkowski and Others v. Poland (Application No. 1543/06). Judgment. Strasbourg. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-80464%22]}.
European Court of Human Rights. (2009a, February 18). Case of Andrejeva v. Latvia (Application No. 55707/00). Judgment. Strasbourg. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search.aspx?i=001-91388
European Court of Human Rights. (2009b, June 9). Case of Opuz v. Turkey (Application No. 33401/02). Judgment. Strasbourg. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search.aspx?i=003-2759276-3020932
European Court of Human Rights. (2009c, July 30). Case of Danilenkov and Others v. Russia (Application No. 67336/01). Judgment. Strasbourg. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-117260&filename=001-117260.pdf&TID=ihgdqbxnfi
European Court of Human Rights. (2010, February 23). Case of Аhmet Arslan and Others v. Turkey (Application No. 41135/98). Judgment. Strasbourg. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=002-1131&filename=002-1131.pdf&TID=ihgdqbxnfi
European Court of Human Rights. (2011a, March 10). Case of Kiyutin v. Russia. (Application No. 2700/10). Judgment. Strasbourg. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-144977&filename=001-144977.pdf
European Court of Human Rights. (2011b, March 18). Case of Lautsi and Others v. Italy (Application No. 30814/06). Judgment. Strasbourg. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-104040&filename=001-104040.pdf
European Court of Human Rights. (2013a, January 15). Case of Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom (Application No. 48420/10; 59842/10; 51671/10; 36516/10). Judgment. Strasbourg. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search.aspx?i=001-115881
European Court of Human Rights. (2013b, October 3). Case of I.B. v. Greece. (Application No. 552/10). Judgment. Strasbourg. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=003-4520290-5453651&filename=003-4520290-5453651.pdf
European Court of Human Rights. (2014, March 25). Case of Biao c. Danemark (Application No. 38590/10, § 113). Judgment. Strasbourg. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search.aspx?i=001-141941
European Court of Human Rights. (2016, February 23). Case of Çam v. Turkey (Application No. 51500/08). Judgment. Strasbourg. https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/7067/file/ECHR_Cam_v_Turkey_2016_en.pdf
European Court of Human Rights. (2018, March 27). Case of Aleksandr Aleksandrov v. Russia (Application No. 14431/06). Judgment. Strasbourg. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-181875
European Court of Human Rights. (2020a, March 16). Case of Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom (Application No. 42184/05). Judgment. Strasbourg. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search.aspx?i=001-97704
European Court of Human Rights. (2020b, September 10). Case of G.L. v. Italy (Application No. №59751/15). Judgment. Strasbourg. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf
European Court of Human Rights. (2020c, October 20). Case of Napotnik v. Romania (Application No. 30100/18). Judgment. Strasbourg. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf?
Karvatska, S., & Zamorska, L. (2018). Human Rights Principles Interpretation in the Context of the ECHR. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 5(2), 1–14. http://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/ejlpa/article/view/860
Mytsyk, V. V. (2004). Rights of national minorities in international law: monograph. Publishing and Printing House Center Kyiv University.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences, Romania & LUMEN Publishing House

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in European Journal of Law and Public Administration.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
EJLPA Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND