Human Dignity and Its Premises in the Pandemic Crisis

Authors

  • Gabriela Nemțoi Associate Prof. PhD, “Ştefan cel Mare” University of Suceava

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/8.2/155

Keywords:

Rights and freedoms, the right to life, human dignity, crisis situation

Abstract

Human dignity is a component that is part of the quality of existing as a human being even if the latter is the product of creationism or evolutionism. In its content, dignity is the carrier of complex scientific valences, combining the philosophical-religious paradigm with the legal one. In this context, the literature presents human dignity as an aspect traditionally associated with the division of public law, which evokes a super-positive reality, synthesizing elements of religion, ethics and morals located in a position superior to positive law, orienting the latter.
The modern meaning given to human dignity oscillates between the illustrative character and the prescriptive character being constituted, in a complex sense, by the fusion between the moral content and the coercive right (Habermas, 2010, pp. 464-480) and, from another perspective, a stable notion that presupposes an objective moral principle that makes possible the legal recognition of human rights. The inability to include human dignity as a right in a unitary conceptualization leads, first of all, to the vast philosophical hermeneutics that is implicit in the discourse on dignity.

References

Bulgaru, A., & Berna, M. B. (2020). Problematica respectării demnităţii umane în condiţii de criză din perspectiva implicaţiilor etico-juridice generate de pandemia de COVID-19 [The issue of respecting human dignity in crisis conditions from the perspective of ethical and legal implications generated by the pandemic covit-19]. Drepturile omului, 20, 9-28. https://revista.irdo.ro/pdf/2020/revista_2_2020/01_Bulgaru_Berna.pdf

Constitutional Court. (2019, July 18). Decision No 464 of 18 July 2019 on the legislative proposal to revise the Constitution of Romania [Pl-x 331/3.07.2019]. Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, No 646 of 5 August 2019. https://www.ccr.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Decision-No-464-_2019.pdf

Council of Europe. (1953, September, 3). The Convention in 1950. The European Convention on Human Rights. https://www.coe.int/en/web/human-rights-convention/the-convention-in-1950

European Court of Human Rights. (2013, December 5). Case of Arskaya vs. Ukraine, 45076/05. Judgment. Strasbourg. Council of Europe. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-138590&filename=001-138590.pdf&TID=thkbhnilzk

European Court of Human Rights. (2020, August 31). European Court of Human Rights, Guide on Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights - Derogation in Time of Emergency. Council of Europe. https://www.refworld.org/docid/6048e29816.html

European Union. (2012, September 26). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, OJC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12012P/TXT&from=SL

Habermas, J. (2010). The concept of human dignity and the realistic utopia of human rights. Metaphilosophy, 41(4), 464-480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2010.01648.x

Hathaway, O., Lim, P., & Stevens, M. (2020). COVID-19 and International Law Series – Human Rights Law: Right to Life. Just Security. https://www.justsecurity.org/73426/covid-19-and-international-law-series-human-rights-law-right-to-life/

Köhne, M. (2003). Verfassungsmäßigkeit der lebenslangen Freiheitsstrafe 25 Jahre nach BVerfGE 45, 187 ff [Constitutionality of life imprisonment 25 years according to BVerfGE 45, 187 ff.]. Juristische Rundschau, (1), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1515/juru.2003.1.5

McCrudden, C. (2008). Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law, 19(4), 655-724. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn043

Schultziner, D. (2007). Human Dignity: Functions and Meanings. In J. Malpas & N. Lickiss (Eds.), Perspectives on Human Dignity (pp. 9-18). Springer.

South Africa: Constitutional Court. (1997, April 18). Prinsloo v Van der Linde and Another (CCT4/96) [1997] ZACC 5; 1997 (6) BCLR 759; 1997 (3) SA 1012 (18 April 1997). Southern African Legal Information Institute. http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/1997/5.html

UN Human Rights Committee (HRC). (2019, September 3). General comment no. 36, Article 6 (Right to Life), 3 September 2019, CCPR/C/GC/35. UN Human Rights Committee (HRC). https://www.refworld.org/docid/5e5e75e04.html

United Nations. (1966, December 16). Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966 entry into force 23 March 1976, in accordance with Article 49. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx

United Nations. (2020, April 30). Statement on derogations from the Covenant in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/CCPR/COVIDstatementEN.pdf

United Nations. (2020, March 19). COVID-19: Governments must promote and protect access to and free flow of information during pandemic – International experts. United Nations. Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=25729

Downloads

Published

2021-12-20

How to Cite

Nemțoi, G. (2021). Human Dignity and Its Premises in the Pandemic Crisis. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 8(2), 01-14. https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/8.2/155

Issue

Section

International Law. European Law. Comparative Law.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now