Legal Regulation of Taxation in The Swiss Confederation
Keywords:Swiss fiscal municipalization, subsidiarity, sovereignty of the basic territorial collectives, Swiss instrumental state.
AbstractThe article considers the Swiss model of fiscal municipalization from the ideological and methodological positions of the anthroposociocultural approach. Such components of this approach as historical and genetic methods together with the method of system-structural analysis were applied especially thoroughly and consistently. By means of them it was found that the Swiss model of fiscal decentralization is an attributive part of the construction of public power in Switzerland – municipalization from bottom to top. Special attention is drawn to defining the basic legal features of the Swiss model of fiscal municipalization. It is argued that subsidiarity does not paradigmatically coincide with decentralization: the principle of subsidiarity postulates the sovereignty of the basic territorial collectives and considers the possible conditions for its limitation for general social needs and values. On the contrary, the principle of decentralization has the national level of governance as the starting point and considers the conditions of delegation of certain tasks and competences by the state to the lower levels of public power hierarchy in the principal frames of state sovereignty. Specificity of the principle of subsidiarity in Switzerland is that cantons play dual role from the standpoint of administrative federalism. On the one hand, they are the bearers of sovereignty of public power, including taxation. On the other hand, they are the sole bearers of administrative authority and are obliged to serve national interests, that is, the needs of the entire Swiss Confederation. Paradox is that this service function of the cantons gives them considerable benefits in the inevitable opposition to the Union state, when it comes to provision of services of the entire fiscal system and the entire system of public finance.
Council of Europe. European Charter of Local Self-Government [accessed 2018 Apr 20]. Available from: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/- /conventions/treaty/122.
Sow M, Razafimahefa IF. Fiscal Decentralization and the Efficiency of Public Service Delivery. 2015 [accessed 2018 Apr 20]. Available from: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2015/wp1559.pdf.
Stoilova D. Financial Decentralization and the Downturn: Evidence from Bulgaria [accessed 2018 Apr 20]. Available from: http://anale.feaa.uaic.ro /anale/resurse/fin14stoilova.pdf.
Rosen HS, editor. Fiscal Federalism: Quantitative Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987.
Loomis M. J., Decentralism: Where It Came From – Where Is It Going? Montréal: Black Rose Books; 2005.
Johnson NL. Diversity in Decentralized Systems: Enabling SelfOrganizing Solutions. Decentralization II Conference, UCLA. Los Angeles; 1999 Nov 19-20 [accessed 2018 Apr 20]. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/afd5/d85f8548e962f 3b9ecec4c1b4bd29af403e5.pdf.
De Mello LR. Fiscal Decentralization and Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations: A Cross-Country Analysis. World Development. 2000; 28 (2): 365-80.
Fisman, R, Gatti R. Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence Across Countries. Journal of Public Economics. 2002; 83: 325-545.
Greene WH. Econometric Analysis. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company; 1993.
Ma J. Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfer: A Comparison of Nine Countries. In: World Bank Economic Development Institute: Working Paper Series; 1997.
Neyapti B, Fiscal Decentralization and Deficits: International Evidence, Ankara: Bilkent University; 2003.
Oates WE, Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanowich; 1972.
Oates WE.. Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Development. National Tax Journal. 1993; 46 (2): 237-43.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Fiscal Decentralization in EU Applicant States and Selected EU Members. Paris; 2002.
Panizza U. On the Determinants of Fiscal Centralization: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Public Economics. 1999; 74: 97-139.
Petchey JD. Equalization in a Federal Economy with Inter-State Migration. Australian Economic Papers. 1993; 32: 336-54.
Sag bas I, Bag digen M. Local Government Finance in Turkey. Istanbul: Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, Directorate for Research. Afyon Kocatepe University; 2003.
Samuelson PA. The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics. 1954; 36 (4): 387-9.
Tanzi V. On Fiscal Federalism: Issues to Worry About. Conference on Fiscal Decentralization; 2000 [accessed 2018 Apr 20]. Available from: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/seminar/2000/fiscal/tanzi.pd f.
Treisman D. Decentralization and the Quality of Government. Los Angeles: Department of Political Science, UCLA; 2000 [accessed 2018 Apr 20]. Available from: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/seminar/2000/fiscal /treisman.pdf.
Von Braun J, Grote U. Does Decentralization Serve the Poor? Bonn: Center for Development Research, University of Bonn; 2000 [accessed 2018 Apr 20]. Available from: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/seminar/2000 /fiscal/vonbraun.pdf.
Yilmaz S, Bindebir S. Intergovernmental Transfers: Concepts and Policy Issues. Washington: World Bank Institute; 2003 [accessed 2018 Apr 20]. Available from: http://www.kdi.re.kr/upload/7050/VI_Yilmaz.pdf.
Von Hagen J, Harden IJ. Budget Processes and Commitment to Fiscal Discipline. European Economic Review. 1995; 39: 771-9.
Federal, Cantonal and Communal Taxes. An outline on the Swiss Tax System. Bern; 2016 [accessed 2018 Apr 20]. Available from: https://wifoe.tg.ch/public/upload/assets/34523/AnoutlineontheSwis sTaxSystem2016.pdf.
Amonn T. A Manual in Tax Law: 212 Questions and Answers about German Tax Law with Examples and Solutions (Direct Taxes, Law Services Fee, Income Tax, VAT). 3rd ed. Bern: Haupt Verlag AG; 2008.
Locher P, Blumenstein E. The System of the Swiss Tax Law. 6th ed. Zürich: Schulthess; 2002.
Mäusli-Allenspach P, Oertli M. Swiss Tex Law: A Study with Examples (in German). 4th ed. Berne: Cosmos; 2006.
Kostya D. Institution of Natural Resources Payments in the System of Financial Law of Ukraine. In: Mrkyvka P, editor. System of Financial Law: General Part. Conference Proceedings. 1st ed. Brno: Masaryk University, Faculty of Law; 2015. p. 292-311.
Khudyk A. Constitualization of public finances: Ukrainian Model. In: Mrkyvka P, editor. System of Financial Law: General Part. Conference Proceedings. 1st ed. Brno: Masaryk University, Faculty of Law; 2015. p. 224-341.
Raritska V. Tax Sovereignty as a Fundamental Characteristic of Tax Law System. In: Mrkyvka P, editor. System of Financial Law: General Part. Conference Proceedings. 1st ed. Brno: Masaryk University, Faculty of Law; 2015. p. 345-361.
Alʹpy i svoboda. Shveytsarsʹki pysʹmennyky pro svoyu krayinu: 1291- 1991. Moskva; 1992.
Okunʹkov LA. Federalʹna konstytutsiya Shveytsarsʹkoyi Konfederatsiyi vid 1999 Kvi 18. In: Okunʹkov LA. Konstytutsiya derzhav Yevropy: v 3 t. Vol 3. Moscow: Norma; 2001.
Fischer R, Beljean Т, Fivaz J. More Equal Chances and SelfResponsibility: the New Swiss Financial Regulation between the State and the Cantons. Vierltelsjahrhefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung. 2003 72 (3): 407-22.
Bullinger АВ. Equalization Reform in Switzerland: Ideal Solutions, Unpredictable Outcomes. In: Report at the Conference Fiscal Federalism: Working Out the Future. Regina: The Saskatchewan Institute of Public Policy; 2000 Oct 12-13.
Freiburghaus D, Zehnder V. Horizontal Cooperation between the Cantons and the Central Switzerland. In: Working Paper of 1'IDHEAP 4. Chavanne-pres-Renens; 2003.
Mottu E. Reforme de la perequation financiere et príncipe de Subsidiarität. Swiss Political Science Review. 1999; 3 (3).
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Constitution of Ukraine of 1996 Jun 28 [accessed 2018 Apr 20]. Available from: http:zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws /show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80.
Chernezhenko O. The Constitutional-legal Model of Local SelfGovernment in Switzerland. Ph.D. (in law) Dissertation Abstract. Specialty: 12.00.02. – Constitutional Law, Municipal Law.Kharkiv. 2013. 20 p. / Chernezhenko OM. Konstytutsiyno-pravova modelʹ mistsevoho samovryaduvannya v Shveytsariyi. Dissertation. Kharkiv: University of Kharkiv; 2013.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2018 Petro PATSURKIVSKYY, Ruslana HAVRYLYUK
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in European Journal of Law and Public Administration.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
EJLPA Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs