CONCEPTUAL REFERENDUM- SOCIO-LEGAL ASPECTS AND SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES
Keywords:
Referendum, marriage, consensual union, homoparentality, adoption.Abstract
The culture in which the individual is born and socialized will always impress upon him.Analyzing the surface of social polemics about the "danger" of LGBT marriage, heterosexuality seems to be the main landmark of marital cohabitation, and minority alternatives seem to be a form of symbolic aggression that most feel sympathetic to accepting. Also, looking from the perspective of family protection actions through this ample national action, the referendum becomes more of an action to protect a simple concept of marriage than to protect the marital conjugal space, around which all fears about marriage are being developed (with all the "risks" of being "veiled" by same-sex couples claims). However, the legal modification of marriage only between man and woman does not protect conjugality from the "danger" of legalizing homosexual marital unions, nor from marriage-like rights such as adoption.
The study aims to analyze comparatively international laws on consensual union and marriage, insisting on socio-legal resources that express rights similar to marriage in the European space.
References
Mécary, C., & Leroy-Forgeot, F. (2000). Le PACS, Presses Universitaire de France, Paris.
Mitrofan, N., & Mitrofan, I. (1991). Familia de la A la Z: mic dicţionar al vieţii de familie, Bucureşti: Editura Ştiinţifică şi Enciclopedică
Prună, M. (2005). Căsătorie versus coabitare. O analiză comparativă în Sociologie românească, III, 3/2005, pp. 39 – 45.
Roussel, L. (1989). La famille incertaine. Paris: Editions Odile Jacob
Singly, F. (de).(1993). Sociologie de la famille contemporaine, Paris: Nathan
Terré, F., Fenouillet, D., Lécuyer, H., & Reiss, L. (2002). Le droit de la famille. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
Voinea, M. (2005). Familia contemporană. Mică enciclopedie. Bucureşti: Editura Focus.