About Limits in Exercising the Active Role of the Judge in Romanian Procedural Law

Authors

  • Mihai Lupu Researcher, Romanian Academy, Iasi Branch, ”Gh. Zane” Institute for Economic and Social Research

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/jls/17.3-4/109

Keywords:

litigation, judge, active role, limits

Abstract

The active role of the judge, a fundamental principle of procedural law, is applied as varied as the personalities of the judges who administer justice are different.

In relatively simple lawsuits, with a well-defined object and placed in a single demand end, the active role is limited to following a natural, predictable path. However, there are also situations in which the lawsuits have a complex object, with several claims, an object that does not, in fact, resolve the dispute, but will probably lead to another lawsuit.

The tendency to emphasize formalism raises the issue of the ever-increasing limitation of the judge's role.

In this paper I propose to outline some of these boundaries and possible situations in which the judge, exercising his active role by possibly expanding the procedural framework, resolves the dispute and prevents a new trial.

References

Boroi, G., & Stancu, M. (2020). Drept procesual civil (ediția a V-a, revizuită și adăugită) [Civil procedural law (Fifth Edition, Revised and Added)]. Hamangiu.

Burțea-Cioroianu, C-E, & Nicole, E. V. (2012). Metodologie juridică [Legal methodology]. Universul Juridic Publishing House.

Constitutional Court of Romania. (2021). Decizia Curții Constituționale a României nr 338/2021, Publicat în M. Of. al României, Partea I, nr. 1253 din 30.12.2021 Decision no. 338/2021, Constitutional Court of Romania, Published in Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 1253 from 30.12.2021.

Court of Appeal of Iasi. (2020). Decizia nr. 19/2020 a Curții de Apel Iași, publicată în Jurisprudența Curților de Apel nr. 6 din 30.07.2020 Decision no 19/2020 of Iasi Appeal Court, published in Appeal Courts Jurisprudence no 6 from 30.07.2020. https://portal.just.ro/45/Documents/Decizii%20relevante/2020/Civil_I_2020.pdf

Court of Appeal of Timisoara. (2016). Decizia Curții de apel Timișoara, publicată pe portal.just.ro, 23.11.2016 Decision no 337/2016 of Timisoara Appeal Court, published on portal.just.ro, 23.11.2016. https://portal.just.ro/59/Documents/Decizii%20relevante/C%20Ap%20Timisoara%20Civ%20I%20T1%202016.pdf

European Court of Human Rights. (2009). Hotărârea în Cauza Iordache împotriva României din 14.10.2009, Publicat în Monitorul Oficial, Partea I nr. 797 din 23 noiembrie 2009 ECHR Iordache vs Romania Decision from 14.10.2009, Published in Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 797 from 23.11.2009. https://lege5.ro/gratuit/gezdsnzxg4/hotararea-in-cauza-iordache-impotriva-romaniei-din-14102008

National Institute of Magistracy. (2019). Minuta întâlnirii reprezentanților Consiliului Superior al Magistraturii cu preşedinţii secţiilor civile ale Înaltei Curţi de Casaţie şi Justiţie şi curţilor de apel [National Institute of Magistracy. Proceedings of meeting between the representatives of the Superior Council of Magistracy and the presidents of the civil sections of the High Court of Cassation and Justice and the courts of appeal], Pitesti, November 14-15, 2019. http://inm-lex.ro/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/minuta-intalnire-civil-Pitesti-14-15-noiembrie-2019.pdf

Leș, I. (2022). Codul de procedură civilă. Comentariu pe articole (ediția a III-a) [Code of Civil Procedure. Commentary on articles (3rd edition)]. C.H. Beck.

Muraru, I., Constantinescu, M., & Tănăsescu, E. S. (2012). Interpretarea Constituţiei – doctrină şi practică [Interpretation of the Constitution - doctrine and practice]. Lumina Lex Publishing House.

Parliament of Romania. (1993). Codul de procedură civilă din 27.06.1993, Publicat în Broșura Oficială nr. 0 din 27.06.1993 Current law from 27.06.1993, Published in Official Broshure no. 0 from 27.06.1993. https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocumentAfis/26297

Parliament of Romania. (2004). Legea nr. 554/2004, Publicat în M. Of. al României, Partea I, nr. 1154 din 07.12.2004, modificată prin Legea nr. 262/2007, Publicat în M. Of. al României, Partea I, nr. 510 din 30.07.2002, și Legea nr. 212, Publicat în M. Of. al României, Partea I, nr. 658 din 30.07.2018 Law no. 554/2004, Published in Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 1154 from 07.12.2004, changed by Law no. 262/2007, Published in Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 510 from 30.07.2007, and Law no. 212/2018, Published in Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 658 from 30.07.2018. https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/183776

Parliament of Romania. (2009). Codul penal – Legea nr. 286/2009, Publicat în M. Of. al României, Partea I, nr. 510 din 24.07.2009 Penal Code - Law no. 286/2009, Published in Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 510 from 24.07.2009.

Parliament of Romania. (2015). Codul de procedură civilă din 15.02.2013, Republicat în M. Of. al României, Partea I, nr. 247 din 15.04.2015 Civil Procedure Code from 15.02.2013, Republished in Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 247 from 15.04.2015.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-12

How to Cite

Lupu, M. . (2022). About Limits in Exercising the Active Role of the Judge in Romanian Procedural Law. Jurnalul De Studii Juridice, 17(3-4), 36-47. https://doi.org/10.18662/jls/17.3-4/109