The Controversial Maternity Supplement Due to Demographic Contribution: Practical Issues and Regulatory and Judicial Responses

Authors

  • Catalina Smintinica UCLM Predoctoral PhD student, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3855-823X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/jls/18.3-4/123

Keywords:

demographic contribution supplement, pension gap, pension supplement, gender discrimination, positive action

Abstract

This paper addresses the study and analysis of the establishment of the maternity supplement towards the current contributory pension supplement for the reduction of the gender gap from three key points. In the first place, and to understand the establishment of the pension supplement, the basis and legal regime of the so-called maternity supplement is analysed. Secondly, the arguments of the CJEU of 12 December 2019, case C-450/18 are set out, which, as a result of the practical application of the maternity supplement for demographic contribution, declared that there was direct discriminatory treatment on grounds of sex between men and women and that the Spanish legislation was contrary to Council Directive 79/7/EEC,  of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security. Likewise, due to its relevant interest in the matter, the latest CJEU in the matter is addressed, specifically the CJEU of 14 September 2023, case C-311/22. Finally, the legal regime of the new pension supplement for the reduction of the gender gap is briefly described.

References

Cruz Villalón, Jesús, (2003) "The incidence of the family institution on labour legislation", in SEMPERE NAVARRO, ANTONIO VICENTE (Dir.), The social model in the CE of 1978, BOE, Madrid.

Gala Durán, Carolina, (No. 158/2021), "The new contributory pension supplement for the reduction of the gender gap: what begins badly, ends badly? Labor Issues.

García Romero, Belén, (number 14/2000. BIB 2000/1594)"Family protection in the Spanish Social Security system", in Revista Doctrinal Aranzadi Social.

García Romero, Belén, (No. 74/ 2016) "Social Security Measures in Response to the Challenges Posed by Family Responsibilities: Promotion of the Birth Rate, Work-Life Balance and Gender Equality of Benefits", Social Law Review.

Martínez Barroso, M. ª de los Reyes, ( no. 6/2020, BIB 202012152) "Co-responsible parents, discriminated against? or a restrictive and ignorant interpretation of social reality. Regarding the CJEU of 12 December 2019 (WA vs National Institute of Social Security case, C-450/18)", Aranzadi European Union Magazine.

Monereo Pérez, José Luis, and Rodríguez Iniesta, Guillermo, (no.31/2022), "Lights and Shadows of the Gender Gap Supplement (1995 Maternity Supplement versus 2021 Gender Gap Supplement)", Social Security Law Review.

Olmos Parés, Isabel, (no. 7/2023), "The new contributory pension supplement for the reduction of the gender gap", Journal of Labour and Social Security Legal Studies.

Sánchez-Urán Azaña, M. ª Yolanda, (Vol. 1/2021) "Economic benefits linked to birth, children and protection of the family (from family benefits to family benefits), in Social Security for all people: Social Security protection for people in situations of economic vulnerability and promotion of their social inclusion, coord. by the Spanish Association of Health and Social Security.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-20

How to Cite

Smintinica, C. . (2023). The Controversial Maternity Supplement Due to Demographic Contribution: Practical Issues and Regulatory and Judicial Responses. Jurnalul De Studii Juridice, 18((3-4), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.18662/jls/18.3-4/123

Issue

Section

International Law. European Law. Comparative Law