Improving the Quality of Social Services as a Social Welfare Indicator

Authors

  • Mariana Brumă (Mancaş) MA, Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences, “Ştefan cel Mare” University from Suceava, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/jmsw/03

Keywords:

Social welfare, quality standards, social services, disability, case management,

Abstract

The issue of social protection of vulnerable categories of population (children in difficulty, the elderly, people with disabilities, people or families affected by poverty) is a topic of interest, largely in the context of the need to comply with international norms and requirements in the field, and this concern is reflected a constantly improved legal package in the field of social work. Along with the increase number and diversity of social services provided by institutions, control structures have been set up to monitor the quality of the respective services. The question that arises is to what extent the established standards, as an objective grid for measuring the quality of services, also ensure an increase in the quality of life and well-being of direct beneficiaries, as well as their subjective perception. To this end, we made an analysis of the degree of satisfaction of disabled persons institutionalized in a day care center. Our aim is to operationalize the concept of well-being for elderly people with disabilities. The analysis aims to balance the objective and subjective factors of assesing the quality of social services. Experience and studies in the field have shown that the outcome of the intervention is often correlated to the expectations of beneficiaries, their understanding of and compliance with the set objectives, their participation in the intervention and compliance with an established program. This endeavour ultimately justificaties the role of case management in social services as a determining factor for ensuring their quality.

References

Cojocaru, Ş. (2005). Metode apreciative în asistenţă socială. Ancheta, supervizarea şi managementul de caz [Appreciative methods in social work. Investigation, supervision and case management]. Iaşi, Romania: Polirom.

De Singly, F., Blachet, A., Gotman, A., & Kaufman, J. C. (1998). Ancheta şi metodele ei: chestionarul, interviul de producere a datelor, interviul comprehensiv [Survey and its methods: the questionnaire, the interview for data collection, the comprehensive interview]. Iaşi, Romania: Polirom.

Luca, C., & Gîrleanu-Şoitu, D. (Coords.). (2012). Metodologie de lucru în asistenţa psihosocio-juridică a persoanelor vârstnice [Methodology of working in the psychosocial-legal assistance of the elderly]. Iaşi, Romania: Asociaţia Alternative Sociale.

Miftode, V. (Coord.). (2002). Populaţii vulnerabile şi fenomene de auto-marginalizare [Vulnerable populations and phenomena of self-marginalization]. Iaşi, Romania: Lumen.

Ministry of Labour and Social Justice. (2019). Order no. 1218/2019 for the approval of specific minimum mandatory quality standards regarding the applications of the case management method for the protection of adults with disabilities. Monitorul Oficial al României, 814, 2019, October 08.

Neamţu, G. (2003). Tratat de asistenţă socială [A treatise on social assistance]. Iaşi, Romania: Polirom.

Romanian Parliament. (2011). Law no. 292/2011 on social work. Monitorul Oficial al României, 905, 2011, December 20.

Romanian Parliament. (2012). Law no. 197/2012 regarding quality assurance in the field of social services. Monitorul Oficial al României, 754, 2012, November 09.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-21

How to Cite

Brumă (Mancaş), M. (2020). Improving the Quality of Social Services as a Social Welfare Indicator. Journal of Mediation & Social Welfare, 1(1), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.18662/jmsw/03