A Comparative Analysis, within the Posthumanist Context, of Compassion and Love in Y. N. Harari’s Thought and C.S. Peirce’s Phenomenology

Authors

  • Călin-Ioan Taloș Lecturer, „Emanuel” University of Oradea, Oradea, the county of Bihor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/jsmi/2.1/11

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, compassion, love, phenomenology, singularity, coercion, hate

Abstract

Posthumanism points out the onset of a new existential episode for the humankind. In the epilogue of the first episode one can notice the advance of humanity in knowledge and innovation without, however, identifying a similar progress with regard to altruism and compassion. Wars are still threatening us even in this century, and hard feelings are at home everywhere around us.  We have now reached the dawn of an era found under the auspices of artificial intelligence.  Shoshana Zuboff draws our attention to „surveillance capitalism”, pinpointing the existence of the deliberate social inequality. Nick Bostrom, Ray Kurzweil and Max Tegmark emphasize the possibility that machines may acquire „singularity”, a situation in which machines will produce machines that are made according to their own will and independent of the human being, in fact against them, and Yuval Noah Harari announces the next stage in human evolution, anticipating the condemnation of homo sapiens. All these realities and predictions signal the evil that man can do to his neighbour and to himself, implicitly. To what extent can the progress of innovation be accompanied by a progress in the practical implementation of moral values such as love and compassion? How can we think in such a manner that the advance in innovation will not become a weapon against man, but an instrument for his own benefit? In this article I am proposing a brief comparative analysis of Y. N. Harari’s naturalist philosophy of meaning and the phenomenology of love in C.S. Peirce’s philosophy, with the purpose of representing thought paradigms that may considerably contribute to a compassion-driven technological transformation.

References

Borghino, D. (2014, May 20). „World’s Smallest Nanomotor Could Power Cell-Sized Nanobots for Drug Delivery”, New Atlas. Retrieved from: https://newatlas.com/nanomotor-for-nanobot-drug-delivery/32160/.

Bostrom, N. (2019). Super inteligența, Căi, Pericole, Strategii. București: Litera.

De Waal, C. (2001). On Peirce. USA, Belmont: Wadsworth CENGAGE Learning.

Domingos, P. (2015). The Master Algorithm, How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine will Remake our World. UK: Penguin Random House.

Foot, P. (1978). Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Gilad, M. (2019 Aug 1). „Early Cracks in the Reputation of 'Know-it-all' Israeli Philosopher Yuval Noah Harari”. Haaretz. Retrieved from: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-early-cracks-in-the-reputation-of-yuval-noah-harari-1.7610839.

Hartshorne, C.,Weiss, P., Burks, A. W.( eds). The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Electronic Edition, PDF. (1 June 1994). Reproducing vols. I-VI Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931-1935, vols. VII-VIII, same publisher,1958.

Harari, Y. N. (2017a). Sapiens, Scurtă Istorie a Omenirii. Traducere de Adrian Șerban. Iași, București: Polirom.

Harari, Y. N. (2018b). Homo Deus, Scrută Istorie a Viitorului. București: Polirom.

Harari, Y. N. (2018c). 21 de lecții pentru secolul XXI. Iași, București: Polirom.

Hobbes, T. (1881). Leviathan, The Matter, Forme and Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill. Oxford: James Thornton, High Street.

Krasicki, J. (2002). "Posthumanism and Russian Religious Thought," Studies in East European Thought 54 (1/2): 125-43. Retrieved from: www.jstor.org/stable/20099786.

Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Row.

More, M., & More, N.V. (eds.) (2013). The Transhumanist Reader, Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future. UK: West Sussex. Kindle Edition.

Ricoeur, P. (2009). Iubire și Justiție. București: Editura Art.

Rothblatt, M. (2014). Virtually Human, The Promise – And the Paril – of Digital Immortality.New York: St. Martin’s Press. Kindle Edition.

Schussler, A-E. (2019). „Transhumanism as a New Techno-religion and Personal Developement:In the Framework of a Future Technological Spirituality,” Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies. © SACRI; 18, (53): 92-106. Retrieved from: http://jsri.ro/ojs/index.php/jsri/article/view/1078.

Taloș, C. I. (2019). Fenomenologia Iubirii în Filosofia lui C. S. Peirce [teză de doctorat, Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania].

Tegmark, M. (2019). Viața 3.0, Omul în Epoca Inteligenței Artificiale. București: Humanitas.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Suveillance Capitalism, The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs imprint of Perseus Books, LLC.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-06

How to Cite

Taloș, C.-I. (2020). A Comparative Analysis, within the Posthumanist Context, of Compassion and Love in Y. N. Harari’s Thought and C.S. Peirce’s Phenomenology. Journal for Social Media Inquiry, 2(1), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.18662/jsmi/2.1/11