The Effects of the Judgment of the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-83/19, C-127/19, C-195/19, C-291/19, C-355/19, C- 397/19.The Obligation of the Decisions of the Romanian Constitutional Court and the Supremacy of EU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenlaw/9.1/56Keywords:
supremacy of law, primacy of law, supremacy of the ConstitutionAbstract
The supremacy of the Constitution is therefore compatible with the application systems that give application preference to regulations from legislation other than national law, as long as the Constitution itself established this provision, which happens exactly with the provision provided in art. 93, which allows the transfer of powers resulting from the Constitution in favor of an international institution thus constitutionally empowered to regulate matters previously reserved for domestic powers and their application.
References
Constantinescu, M., Iorgovan, A., Muraru, I., & Tănăsescu, E. S. (2004). Constituţia României revizuită – comentarii şi explicaţii [Revised Romanian Constitution - comments and explanations]. All Beck.
Constitutional Court of Romania. (2003, May 12). RCC Decision no. 148 / 16.04.2003 regarding the constitutionality of the legislative proposal for the revision of the Romanian Constitution prior to Romania's accession to the EU. Monitorul Oficial al Romaniei, 317. http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocumentAfis/43692
Constitutional Court of Romania. (2021a). Comunicat de presa, 23 decembrie 2021 [Press release, December 23, 2021]. https://www.ccr.ro/comunicat-de-presa-23-decembrie-2021/
Constitutional Court of Romania. (2021b). RCC Decision no. 390 of June 8, 2021 regarding the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art.881 -889 din Law no. 304/2004 on the organization of the judiciary, as well as the Ordinance of Government Emergency No. 90/2018 on some measures for operationalization Section for the investigation of criminal offenses. https://www.ccr.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Decizie_390_2021.pdf
European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). (2014). “Co-operation of Constitutional Courts in Europe Current Situation and Perspectives” Working Document for the XVIth Congress of the Conference of European Constitutional Courts. https://www.venice.coe.int/files/2014-05-02-CECC-e.pdf
European Court of Justice. (1964). Judgment of 15.07.1964 in Case 6/46, Costa vs. Enel. https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=87399&pageIndex=0&doclang=RO&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=2580507
European Court of Justice. (1970). Judgment of 17.12.1970 in Case C-11/70 (Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH). https://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf?
text=&docid=88063&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3398256
European Court of Justice. (1978). Judgment of 09.03.1978 in Case C-106/77 (Simmenthal). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61977CJ0106
European Court of Justice. (2021a). Judgment of the CJEU of 18.05.2021, in Joined Cases C 83/19, C 127/19, C 195/19, C 291/19, C 355/19 and C 397/19. https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=241381&text=&dir=&doclang=RO&part=1&occ=first&mode=DOC&pageIndex=0&cid=4421197
European Court of Justice. (2021b). Judgment of the CJEU of 21.12.2021, in Joined Cases C-357/19 Euro Box Promotion şi alţii, C-379/19 DNA- Serviciul Teritorial Oradea, C-547/19 Asociaţia « Forumul Judecătorilor din România », C-811/19 FQ e.a. e, C-840/19 NC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62020CJ0124
Florescu, C. M. (2021). Notes to the CJEU judgment of 21 December 2021 in Euro Box Promotion and Others. Settlement of administrative and fiscal litigation disputes: between the obligation of the decisions of the Romanian Constitutional Court and the supremacy of EU law, https://www.juridice.ro/763772/note-la-hotararea-cjue-din-21-decembrie-2021-pronuntata-in-cauzele-conexate-euro-box-promotion-si-altii-solutionarea-litigiilor-de-contencios-administrativ-si-fiscal-intre-obligativitatea-deciz.html#_ftn1
Uscov, S. (2021). MCV, CJUE şi CCR – De ce MCV a expirat în 2010 şi o analiză a supremaţiei şi primatului în raporturile dintre ordinea juridică naţională şi ordinea juridică a UE. Partea a II-a [MCV, CJEU and RCC - Why MCV expired in 2010 and an analysis of supremacy and primacy in the relationship between the national legal order and the EU legal order. Second part]. https://www.juridice.ro/764579/mcv-cjue-si-ccr-de-ce-mcv-a-expirat-in-2010-si-o-analiza-a-suprematiei-si-primatului-in-raporturile-dintre-ordinea-juridica-nationala-si-ordinea-juridica-a-ue-partea-a-ii-a.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
LUMEN Law Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
