An Ethnographic Account on Transparency and Participation in Civil-Public Cooperation: Enablers and Constraints in Iaşi, the First Romanian City Admitted to Open Government Partnership - Local Program

Authors

  • Oana Olariu “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University, Iași, Romania, Faculty of Letters - Journalism and Communication Studies
  • Raluca Onufreiciuc Phd candidate University of Bucharest and University of A Coruna, Bucharest/A Coruna, Romania/Spain, Teaching assistant ”Stefan cel Mare” University of Suceava

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenlaw/10.1/70

Keywords:

transparency, participation, open government partnership, Iasi, civil-public collaboration

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to pioneer ethnographic research on enablers and constraints in transparency and participation building at the local level. The case study is focused on Iași’s experience as the first Romanian city admitted to Open Government Partnership - Local Program and highlights how the relative trust of local authorities in civil actors translated into maximal inclusion and freedom for drafting the city action plan on transparency and open governance. However, trust was also fueled by local authorities’ disengagement with OGP mechanisms, which translated into watercolor local democracy. Particular emphasis is placed on the dynamics of friendliness as a soft pressure mechanism securing collaboration between civil actors and public servants, to counterbalance the lack of political will in designing participatory structures. The authors come to the conclusion that toe-holds bridging civil society pioneers and friendly technical staff of the City Hall have cornerstone value for enabling democracy innovation at the local level when political will is weak. However, it is not enough to ensure continuity and there is a need for both civil society capacity building and political reframing to build sustainable transparency that converts into genuine public participation.

References

Bourdieu, P. (2000). Propos sur le champ politique. Presses Universitaires Lyon.

Cetăţenii Conduc. (n.d.). Despre proiect. http://cetateniiconduc.asociatiacivica.ro/

Chatwin, M., & Francoli, M. (2022). How ‘Local’are Action Plans submitted by Open Government Partnership Local Participants?. People, Place, 15(3).

City of Iasi. (2019). OGP Local Action Plan. https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Iasi_Action-Plan_2019-2021_EN.pdf

Coleman, S. (2001). The transformation of citizenship. New media and politics, 109-126.

Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance (Vol. 4). Verso.

Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Stanford University Press.

Grcheva, O., & Oktay Vehbi, B. (2021). From public participation to co-creation in the cultural heritage management decision-making process. Sustainability, 13(16), 9321.

Gurin, J. (2014). Open Governments, Open Data: A New Lever for Transparency, Citizen Engagement, and Economic Growth. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 34, 71 - 82.

Haus, M., Heinelt, H., & Stewart, M. (Eds.). (2004). Urban governance and democracy: leadership and community involvement (Vol. 8). Routledge.

Ingrams, A. (2018). Transparency for results: Testing a model of performance management in open government initiatives. International journal of public administration, 41(13), 1033-1046.

Miller, C. (2022). ‘Ethno, Ethno, What?’: Using Ethnography to Explore the European Parliament’s Political Groups in Turbulent Times. In European Parliament’s Political Groups in Turbulent Times (pp. 245-266). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Open Government Partnership Romania. (2018). National Action Plan 2018-2020. http://ogp.gov.ro/nou/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Romania-2018-2020_NAP_EN.pdf

Ne Reprezintă. (n.d.) Despre proiect. https://nereprezinta.ro/about

Onufreiciuc, R. (2021). Transparenţa şi guvernarea deschisă, vectori ai dezvoltării locale în administraţia publică locală est-europeană, Contribuţia tinerilor cercetători la dezvoltarea administraţiei publice, Academia de Administrare Publică, Guvernul Republicii Moldova, Chişinău; ISBN 978-9975-3492-3-9

Open Census. (n.d.) http://census.okfn.org

Pippin, R. B. (1999). Modernism as a philosophical problem: on the dissatisfactions of European high culture. Wiley-Blackwell.

Government of Romania, Centre for Public Innovation and Smart City Timisoara. (2017). Recommendations on the Open Government Partnership locally. http://ogp.gov.ro/nou/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Recomandari-Parteneriatul-pentru-Guvernare-Deschisa-la-nivel-local_final.pdf

Saylam, A., Yıldız, M. (2022). Conceptualizing citizen-to-citizen (C2C) interactions within the E-government domain. Government Information Quarterly 39(1). 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101655.

Schmidthuber, L., Hilgers D. (2021). Trajectories of local open government: An empirical investigation of managerial and political perceptions, International Public Management Journal, 24(4), 537-561, DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2020.1853291

Shkabatur, J. (2012). Transparency With(out) Accountability: Open Government in the United States ,Yale Law & Policy Review 31(1), 1-62.

Uşi deschise către adminstraţia ieşeană. Nu mai vrem să privim pe gaura cheii (n.d.). CIVICA. http://asociatiacivica.ro/usi-deschise-catre-administratia-ieseana/

Visvizi, A., & Lytras, M. (2019, July 2). Smart Cities: Issues and Challenges: Mapping Political, Social and Economic Risks and Threats, 1st edition, Elsevier.

Žižek, S. (2012). The Year of Dreaming Dangerously, Londra, New York: Verso.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-01

How to Cite

Olariu, O., & Onufreiciuc, R. (2022). An Ethnographic Account on Transparency and Participation in Civil-Public Cooperation: Enablers and Constraints in Iaşi, the First Romanian City Admitted to Open Government Partnership - Local Program. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Law, 10(1), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenlaw/10.1/70