Interstate Lawsuits of Ukraine to the ECTHR: Is it Realistic to Achieve Final Judgments?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenlaw/12.1/86Keywords:
ECtHR, interstate applications of Ukraine, regional and international judiciary bodies, fundamental human rights, responsibility, satisfactionAbstract
The article examines the problems and prospects of consideration of interstate applications of Ukraine against the Russian Federation by the ECtHR. The article analyzes that the ECtHR is currently considering five interstate cases initiated by Ukraine against the Russian Federation. However, the Russian Federation does not participate in the proceedings on the claims of Ukraine and does not intend to comply with the ECHR judgments. However, the ECHR will continue to consider the applications submitted to the ECtHR after Russia's withdrawal from the Council of Europe. The article proves that today there is no mechanism for enforcement of the ECtHR judgments on interstate claims of Ukraine by the Russian Federation. Since the Russian Federation does not intend to execute the decisions of the ECtHR voluntarily, there remains the option of either enforcing such judgments by the affected Ukrainians individually on the principle of reciprocity in other countries or creating a supranational mechanism for the execution of such decisions. It is indicated that in the future, the ECtHR will be able to consider and award compensation in all existing cases against the Russian Federation. Affected companies and individuals can file a claim for violation of property rights against the Russian Federation only in respect of actions or omissions before September 16, 2022.
Nevertheless, even in light of the Russian Federation's withdrawal from the ECHR, all decisions taken before the exit from the ECHR and the CoE must be implemented. Although after the ECtHR has decided on the merits, it takes a long time to decide on just satisfaction.
In conclusion, it is noted that the Russian Federation also does not comply with the interim measures demanded by the ECtHR to cease hostilities in Ukraine immediately. At the same time, this procedural decision is vital for considering the case "Ukraine v. Russia - X" on the merits from a historical perspective.
References
Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/166
Arbitral tribunal constituted under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 2022 https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf
Arbitral tribunal constituted under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Ukraine v. Russian Federation on the coastal state rights in the Black Sea, Sea of Azov, and Kerch Strait 2020. https://www.acerislaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Genocide-Convention.pdf
International Court of Justice preliminary decision in Ukraine v Russia. (2022). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2022/729350/EPRS_ATA(2022)729350_EN.pdf
International Court of Justice. (2019). Ukraine v. Russian Federation
International Court of Justice (2022). Ukraine v. Russian Federation on the allegations of genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
International Court of Justice. (2017). Ukraine v. Russian Federation
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. (2019). Ukraine v. Russian Federation
Medvedieva, M.O. (2022). The concept of jurisdiction in international law. Actual problems in international relations. 152, 26-34. https://doi.org/10.17721/apmv.2022.152.1.26-34
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2022). The tenth lawsuit against Russia in the ECtHR is a case about the collective guarantee of human rights and freedoms in Europe. https://minjust.gov.ua/news/ministry/desyatiy-pozov-proti-rosii-v-espl-sprava-pro-kolektivne-garantuvannya-prav-ta-svobod-lyudini-u-evropi
Russia is no longer in the ECHR. What will happen to the cases of Ukraine against Russia. (2022) https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/news-62926473
Russia will pay the Ukrainians for the war. Is the mission (not) accomplished? Why is compensation for damages caused to Ukrainian citizens and businesses as a result of the Russian military actions practically impossible? (June 9, 2022). https://www.epravda.com.ua/columns/2022/06/9/687970/
The Netherlands against Russia: a claim at the ECtHR. (2022). https://lexinform.com.ua/v-sviti/niderlandy-proty-rosiyi-pozov-u-yespl/
Ukraine fights Russia on the ground and in the courts. (2022). Molly Quell. March 1, https://www.courthousenews.com/ukraine-fights-russia-on-the-ground-and-in-the-courts/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
LUMEN Law Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND