Fundamental Rights and Contractual Justice: Cultural-Legal Interactions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenlaw/13.1/93Keywords:
contract, autonomy of will, fundamental rights, European private law, European contract lawAbstract
This analysis reveals the contribution of fundamental rights to the restoration of contractual balance. The judicial illustrations presented show the difficulties raised by reconciling contractual freedom with the fundamental rights enshrined by the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the triumph of fundamental freedoms over the binding force of the contract. The impact of the ECHR in contractual matters results from the horizontal effect granted to the text, meaning its applicability in inter-individual relations. By providing clarity and strength to fundamental rights, the alliance of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union thus ensures protection and legal certainty within the EU. The developments in European contract law suggest a pluralistic notion of contract in European private law based not only on the will of the parties but also on good faith and legitimate expectations. Indeed, the assessment and restoration of contractual balance concerning the provisions of the ECHR speak of a renewed paradigm of contract in European private law.References
Ancel, M.-É. (2005). Nouvelles frontières: l’avénement de nouveaux ordres juridiques (droit communtauire et droits fondamentaux) [New Frontiers: The Emergence of New Legal Orders (Community Law and Fundamental Rights)]. In G. Pignarre (ed.). Forces Subversives et Forces Créatrices en droit des Obligations. Rétrospectives et Perspectives à l’heure du Bicentenaire du Code civil [Subversive and Creative Forces in the Law of Obligations: Retrospectives and Perspectives at the Bicentennial of the Civil Code]. (pp. 121–144). Dalloz.
Bercea, R. (2020). Protecţia Drepturilor Fundamentale în Sistemul Convenţiei Europene a Drepturilor Omului [The Protection of Fundamental Rights in the System of the European Convention on Human Rights]. C.H. Beck.
Bîrsan, C. (2010). Convenţia Europeană a Drepturilor Omului. Comentariu pe Articole [The European Convention on Human Rights: Commentary by Article]. C.H. Beck.
Bouquet, J. (March 26, 2015). Chagall, l’éternel optimiste, se dévoile à Bruxelles [Chagall, the Eternal Optimist, Unveiled in Brussels]. Franceinfo: Culture. https://www.francetvinfo.fr/culture/arts-expos/peinture/chagall-leternel-optimiste-se-devoile-a-bruxelles/
Busseuil, G. (2009). Contribution à l’étude de la Notion de Contrat en droit Privé Européen [Contribution to the Study of the Notion of Contract in European Private Law]. LGDJ
Carbonnier, J. (2004). Droit Civil, les Biens, les Obligations [Civil Law: Property, Obligations].Presses Universitaires de France.
Chassagnard-Pinet, S. (2008). Les droits fondamentaux à l’épreuve du lien contractuel. Contrat et Convention européenne des droits de l’homme [Fundamental Rights Tested by Contractual Relations: Contract and the European Convention on Human Rights]. In Libre Droit. Mélange en l’honneur de Philippe Le Tourneau [Free Law: Essays in Honor of Philippe Le Tourneau]. (pp. 225–249). Dalloz.
Damas, N. (2004). Les convictions religieuses n’entrent pas, sauf convention expresse, dans le champ contractuel [Religious beliefs are not considered within the scope of the contract, unless expressly agreed otherwise]. Recueil Dalloz, 12, 844. https://actu.dalloz-etudiant.fr/fileadmin/actualites/pdfs/11_2015/01-00.519_D._Damas.pdf
European Court of Human Rights. (2005). Hutten-Czapska v. Poland, judgment of February 22, 2005. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-75882%22]}
European Court of Human Rights. (2001). Pichon and Sajous v. France, judgment of 2 October 2001. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-22644%22]}
Fromont, M. (1975). Les droits fondamentaux dans l’ordre juridique de la République Fédérale d’Allemagne, [Fundamental Rights in the Legal Order of the Federal Republic of Germany]. Revue d’Allemagne et des pays de Langue Allemande, 3, 293–313.
Jugastru, C. (2013). Prejudiciul—Repere Româneşti în Context European [Prejudice. Romanian Landmarks in a European Context]. Hamangiu.
Jugastru, C. (2023). Drept civil. Obligațiile [Civil Law. Obligations]. Hamangiu
Muraru, I., Tănăsescu, E.S. (2023). Drept Constituţional şi Instituţii Politice [Constitutional Law and Political Institutions]. C.H. Beck
Orga-Dumitriu, G. (2013). Dreptul European al Contractelor. Realităţi. Influenţe. Domeniu de Aplicare [European Contract Law: Realities, Influences, Scope]. C.H. Beck
Pélissier, A. (2008). La participation des droits fondamentaux à la construction d’un droit européen des contrats [The Role of Fundamental Rights in the Development of European Contract Law]. In R. Cabrillac, D. Mazeaud & A. Prüm (eds.). Le Contrat en Europe Aujourd’hui et Demain [The Contract in Europe Today and Tomorrow]. (pp. 29–40). Société de Législation Comparée.
Piperea, G. (2014). Terorismul contractual [Contractual Terrorism]. Curierul Judiciar 7: 372–386.
Pop, L., Popa, I.F., Vidu, S.I. (2012). Tratat Elementar de Drept Civil. Obligaţiile Conform Noului Cod Civil [Elementary Treatise on Civil Law: Obligations According to the New Civil Code]. Universul Juridic.
Puig, P. (2011). Formation du contrat et droits fondamentaux (regard privatiste) [Formation of the Contract and Fundamental Rights (Private Law Perspective)]. In D. Costa & A. Pélissier (eds.), Contrats et Droits Fondamentaux [Contracts and Fundamental Rights]. (pp. 21–41). Presses Universitaires Aix-Marseille.
Raynaud, J. (2006). Harmonie de l’immeuble contre liberté religieuse: La Cour de cassation placerait-elle un règlement de copropriété au sommet de la hiérarchie des normes ? [Building Harmony vs. Religious Freedom: Would the Court of Cassation Place a Condominium Regulation at the Top of the Hierarchy of Norms?]. Actualité Juridique Droit Immobilier 609. https://actu.dalloz-etudiant.fr/fileadmin/actualites/pdfs/11_2015/05-14.774_AJDI_Raynaud.pdf
Selejan-Guţan, B. (2011a). Efectele hotărârilor “pilot” ale Curţii Europene a Drepturilor Omului asupra dreptului naţional: O temă de reflecţie actuală [The Pilot Judgement Technique of the European Court of Human Rights on National Law: A Topic of Current Reflection]. Revista de Drept Public, 1: 74–79.
Selejan-Guţan, B. (2011b). Protecţia Europeană a Drepturilor Omului [European Protection of Human Rights].Hamangiu
Selejan-Guţan, B. (2023). Protecţia Europeană a Drepturilor Omului [European Protection of Human Rights].Hamangiu
Stanca, D. (2024). Idealism şi Realism [Idealism and Realism]. România Literară, 19–20. https://romanialiterara.com/2024/05/idealism-si-realism/
Tăvală, E. (2015). Human Rights and/in the Orthodox Church. Romanian Journal of Comparative Law, 1, 104–19.
Vancu, R. (2021). Poeticile memoriei la Paul Celan şi George Steiner: Literatura şi culpa supravieţuitorului [The Poetics of Memory in Paul Celan and George Steiner: Literature and the Survivor’s Guilt]. Revista Transilvania, 11–12, 81–84. https://revistatransilvania.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Transilvania-11-12.2021-81-84.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Authors & InManifest Network

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
LUMEN Law Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND