Fortuna versus Justitia – Preliminaries to a Genealogy of European Private Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenlaw/02Keywords:
European private law, Roman law, genealogy, vindicta, duel,Abstract
This article intends to lay the ground for a genealogy of European private law, in the sense that its purpose is not to follow a mere chronological development of legal rules, notions or institutions, but to organize certain practices employed in the European culture for settling private disputes under the conflicting symbolic patronage of two mythological figures: the Greek goddesses Tyche and Themis, or their Roman equivalent, Fortuna and Justitia. It is a genealogy insofar as it follows the traits of certain practices, such as vindicta, donum, lex talionis, judicium Dei, trial by ordeal or the duel in a lineal descent from a similar mythological ancestor, Fortuna. Although some of these practices were also employed within a certain historical legal framework, enforced by the political authorities through legislation and judiciary courts, and, as such, appearing to be under the patronage of Justitia, they remained fundamentally irreducible to the spirit of justice, which has its roots in ancient Greek philosophical thought and Roman law and which can be expressed through the latin phrase “suum cuique tribuere”. From this genealogical perspective on European private law, Christianity played an ambiguous part: although it contributed to the development of the private law, with regard to both substantial and procedural rules, it also introduced certain asymmetries in the administration of justice, such as forgiveness, or it fully supported certain practices which belong to the realm of Fortuna, such as the inquisition, trial by ordeal or the witch hunt.References
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics.
Aristotle, Physica, II, 197a-198a.
Ciuca, V. M. (2012). Euronomosofia. Vol. I. Iasi: Editura Fundatiei Academice Axis.
Codrea, C. (2015). Strategies for Securing the Judicial Truth in Western Judicial Practices. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, Vol. 3, No. 1, 105-109.
Iustiniani Institutiones
Foucault, M. (2005). A supraveghea si a pedepsi. Pitesti: Paralela 45.
Kretschmer, M. (1927). Atrox Fortuna. The Classical Journal 22.4, January 1927, 267-275.
Nietzsche, F. (2016). Genealogia moralei. Bucuresti: Contemporanul.
Nye, R. (1998). The End of the Modern French Duel. In P. Spierenburg (Ed.), Men and Violence: Gender, Honor, and Rituals in Modern Europe and America (p. 84). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Peters, F. E. (2007). Termenii filozofiei grecesti. Bucuresti: Humanitas.
Saussure, F. (2011). Curs de lingvistica generala. Prahova: Antet.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
LUMEN Law Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND