Introduction to the Phenomenological Approach to Urban, Residential, and Domestic Space


  • Catalina Ionela Rezeanu Transilvania University of Braşov



Lived space, sense of space, constitution of space, meaning of home, appropriation of space


During the last century, in social and humanistic sciences, the dominant perspective on space was the political economy, focusing on how space relates to macro-social phenomena and minimizing the role of the micro-social ones, by conceptualizing space as a social force, constraining social actions. Despite sporadic attempts to theorize how people could escape the dominance of power by investing spaces with subjective meanings, appropriating spaces through body practices, or anchoring memories and identities into specific spaces, there is still a need to understand how spaces are lived and how daily life spatial contexts become micro-foundations for social actions. I conduct an interpretive synthesis to show how social scientists borrowed ideas from philosophers to understand the phenomenology of everyday life by capturing the experience of urban, residential, and domestic space. I explore space through phenomenological lenses to clarify concepts as: the constitution of space through perception, the sensorial and emotional experience of space and the atmosphere of a specific place, the sense of space, the meaning of feeling at home and being intimate with a particular place, the practice of home as a body extension. To nuance these ideas, I use results from four research projects I participated in: Couple living space in Brasov metropolitan area; Hidden faces of homelessness - Measuring homelessness in Europe; Inhabiting urban places and experiencing citizenship; I was a citizen of Stalin town. I conclude by extracting implications for the sociology of space field.


Bachelard, G. (1958). The poetics of space (M. Jolas, Trans.). Boston, USA: Beacon.

Boccagni, P. (2014). What’s in a (migrant) house? Changing domestic spaces, the negotiation of belonging and home-making in Ecuadorian migration. Housing, Theory and Society, 31(3), 277-293. doi:10.1080/14036096.2013.867280

Clarke, A. E., Friese, C., & Washburn, R. (2016). Situational analysis in practice: Mapping research with grounded theory. New York, USA: Routledge.

De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of every day life. Berkeley, USA: University of California Press.

Fairbanks, R. P. (2003). A theoretical primer on space. Critical Social Work, 3(1), 131-354.

Faist, T. (2005). Social space. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social theory (pp. 760- 763). London, UK: Sage Publications.

Gieryn, T. F. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 463-496. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463

Glaeser, A. (1998). Placed selves: The spatial hermeneutics of self and other in the postunification Berlin Police. Social Identities, 4(1), 7-38. doi:10.1080/13504639851870

Heidegger, M. (1971). Building dwelling thinking. In M. Heidegger, Poetry, language, thought (A. Hofstadter, Trans.) (pp. 145–161). New York, USA: Perennial Library.

Jacobson, K. (2009). A developed nature: A phenomenological account of the experience of home. Continental Philosophy Review, 42(3), 355-373. doi:10.1007/s11007-009-9113-1

Lefebvre, H. (1947). Critique of everyday life (vol. 1). London, UK: Verso.

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (vol. 30). Oxford, USA: Blackwell Publishing.

Liu, S. (2009). Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of space: Preliminary reflection on an archaeology of primordial spatiality. In The 3rd BESETO Conference of Philosophy, 5 (pp. 131-140). Retrieved from

Long, J. C. (2013). Diasporic dwelling: The poetics of domestic space. Gender, Place and Culture, 20(3), 329-345. doi:10.1080/0966369x.2012.674932

Löw, M. (2016). The sociology of space: Materiality, social structures, and action. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

Mallett, S. (2004). Understanding home: A critical review of the literature. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 62-89. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.2004.00442.x

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). New York, USA: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.

Morton, C. (2007). Remembering the house memory and materiality in northern Botswana. Journal of Material Culture, 12(2), 157-179. doi:10.1177/1359183507078123

Petrusak, J., Perry, T. E., & Hassevoort, L. (2017). Somewhere to be permanent for a minute: Time and space perceptions of older adult men experiencing chronic homelessness in Detroit. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 27(6), 515-529. doi:10.1080/10911359.2017.1292983

Rahmeier, C. S. (2012). Materiality, social roles and the senses: Domestic landscape and social identity in the estâncias of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Journal of Material Culture, 17(2), 153-171. doi:10.1177/1359183512443613

Rezeanu, C. I. (2018). Social construal maps to study territories within home space. In V. Manolachi, C. M. Rus, & S. Rusnac (Eds.), New approaches in social and humanistic sciences (pp. 404-416). Iaşi, Romania: Lumen.

Shaw, R. (2015). Controlling darkness: Self, dark and the domestic night. Cultural Geographies, 22(4), 585–600. doi:10.1177/1474474014539250

Simmel, G. (1903). The sociology of space. In D. Frisby & M. Featherstone (Eds.), Simmel on culture: Selected writings. The metropolis and mental life (pp. 137-170). London, UK: Sage.

Steinbock, A. J. (1995). Home and beyond: Generative phenomenology after Husserl. Evanston, USA: Northwestern University Press.

Taylor, S. (2013). Searching for ontological security: Changing meanings of home among a Punjabi diaspora. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 47(3), 395-422.

Vanolo, A. (2017). City branding: The ghostly politics of representation in globalising cities. New York, USA: Routledge.




How to Cite

Rezeanu, C. I. (2019). Introduction to the Phenomenological Approach to Urban, Residential, and Domestic Space. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Philosophy & Humanistic Sciences, 6(2), 42-56.