In the Trace of Gerardo Mello Mourão: The Inter-Gender Hybridism and the Formation of Epiliric Poetry in Contemporary Brazilian Literature
Keywords:Contemporaneity, Inter-generational Hybridity, Epic, Resistance, Brazilian Literature
In its configurative and representational basis, contemporary literature has established a warm dialogue with the classic and modern canons for the formation of literary genres that distance themselves from the poetics in force in order to establish their own aesthetics since the contemporary is in maintaining this gaze fixed on the present by returning to the past to deny or affirm it as the tradition of the new or the new of tradition (PAZ, 2000). The present study is justified in raising the reflection on the form of the epic and the lyric based on the transformations that occurred over the centuries to found an epic-lyric poetry as a renewing style of contemporary Brazilian poetry, the object of this research, which is based on the works Invention of the sea and Os peãs, by Gerardo Mello Mourão. The objective is to demonstrate the resistance of the epic in the current world by the hybrid composition that is established in the act of its production by the exteriority of the real along with the narrator's subjectivity. The problem of intergeneric hybridism is developed through bibliographic and qualitative research with intermediation of the deductive method and through the aesthetic-philosophical bias to demonstrate that it becomes the guiding element of this avant-garde style capable of establishing historical events through the temporality built by the world text. This whole discussion is centered on Aristotle (1992) and Boileau (1990), going through Hegel (1997), Lukacs (2000) and Bakhtin (2010) until arriving at Staiger (1997), Lima (2002), Greenfield (2006) and Kristeva (1995), showing that the epic-lyric poem is supported by the pluridiscursive dialogism maintained between the nature of the stylization of the lyric and epos as a style and not as a novelized process.
Adorno, T. W. (2003). About epic ingenuity. In: Literature Notes I (p.p. 47-54). São Paulo: Two cities.
Aristotle. (1992). The classical poetics (5rd ed.). Jaime Bruno Translation. São Paulo: Cultrix.
Bakhtin, M. (2002). Aesthetics of verbal creation. (44rd ed.). São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
_________. (2010). Questions of literature and aesthetics: the theory of romance. (66rd ed.). São Paulo: Hucitec.
Brait, B. (2005). Bakhtin: dialogism and construction of meaning. (22rd ed.). Campinas, SP: Unicamp.
Burke, P. (2008). Hibridismo Cultural. RS: Unisinos, Aldus.
Greenfield, J. (2006). Perception and gender: considerations about acoustic perception in heroic epic and courteous romance. In: _______. The literary genre: norm and transgression (pp. 15-28). Lisbon: Foundation for Science and Technology.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1997). The romantic arts - poetry. In: _______Aesthetics course: the system of the arts (pp. 433-510). São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
Iommi, G. (1996). In: Dorea, G. That’s a good one. Brief critical memory of the work of Gerardo Mello Mourão (p. 16). São Paulo: GRD.
Kristeva, J. (2012). Introduction to noanalysis. São Paulo: Perspective.
Leite, A. M. (1995). The epos and the epic. In: Epic modalization in African literature (pp. 13-37). Lisbon: Veiga.
Lima, L. C. (2002). The question of genders. In: _________ (org.). Theory of literature and its sources (pp. 253-292). (33rd ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Brazilian Civilization.
Lukács, G. (2000). The great epic forms in its relationship to the closed or problematic character of the culture as a whole. In: The theory of romance (pp. 23-69). São Paulo: Two Cities, 2000.
Martins, W. (1998). The Brasilíadas. O Globo, Caderno da Gazeta de Curitiba, 5.
Mourão, G. M. (1999). Os peãs. Rio de Janeiro: Record.
___________. (1997). Invention of the sea. Rio de Janeiro: Record.
Nogueira, E. (1998). Poetry, sea and dreams of Gerardo Mello Mourão. Northeast Diary Newspaper, Fortaleza, Ceará, Notebook 3, 5.
Plato. (2010). The Republic. Translation J. Guinsburg. São Paulo: Perspective.
Silva, V. M. A. (1993). Theory of literature. (88rd ed.). Coimbra: Almedina Bookstore.
Staiger, E. (1997). Fundamental concepts of poetics. (33rd ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Brazilian Weather.
Tynianov, J. (2013). The notion of construction. Of literary evolution. In: _______ Theory of literature: texts of Russian formalists. Translation Roberto Leal Ferreira. São Paulo: UNESP.
Watt, I. (2010). The rise of the novel: studies on Defoe, Richardson and Fielding. Translation Hildegard Feist. São Paulo: Company of Letters.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
LUMEN PHS Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs