Some Approaches Regarding the Philosophy of Technology

Authors

  • Loredana Terec-Vlad PhD, Ștefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenphs/8.2/43

Keywords:

Philosophy of technology, arts, artifacts, humans

Abstract

The concept of technology can be understood in many ways, especially nowadays, when we are practically connected to a multitude of increasingly complex artifacts. Talking about the philosophy of technology means bringing to the fore a multitude of related fields, as technology has changed the way we behave in the world, the way we relate to others and also the way we think and act.

In this paper we will make an analysis of the concepts of technique and technology starting from the philosophies of Antiquity and continue on the way we currently understand man's relationship with artifacts.

References

Aguilar Gordon, F.R. (2011). Reflexiones filosoficas sobre la tecnologia y sus nuevos escenarios. Sophia: Colleccion de Filosofia de la Educacion, 11, 123-174.

Aguilar Gordon, F.R., & Chamba Zarango, A.P. (2019). Reflexiones sobre la filosofia de la tecnologia en los procesos educativos. Conrado, 15(70).

Apostu, I., & Petrescu, C. G. (2017). Bărbatul și femeia: imaginea unei polemici cu privire la echitatea de gen. Lumen.

Aristotel, (2010). Metafizica. Univers Enciclopedic Gold Publishing House.

Aslam, C., & Moraru, C.F. (2017). Filosofia artei în postmodernitate. Unarte Publishing House.

Feenberg, A. (2006). What Is Philosophy of Technology?. In: Dakers J.R. (eds) Defining Technological Literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

Heidegger, M. (1982). Întrebare privitoare la tehnică, in Originea Operei de Artă. Univers Publishing House.

Huidu, A. (2018). Social acceptance of ethically controversed innovative techniques related to or derived from assisted reproductive technologies–A review of literature. Eastern-European Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics, 2(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.18662/eejmhb/11

Latour, B. (1993). We have never been Modern. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Lohan, P.I. (2007). Ethos, Patos, Logos in the Religious Discourse of Father Cleopa. Jornal of Romanian Literary Studies, 12, 500-506.

Noica, C. (1968). Probleme de logică, Volume I. Academia Publishing House.

Pavel, A. A. (2016). A la decouverte de Paris: leçons de communication interculturelle. Lumen.

Platon, (2012). Theatitetos. Humanitas Publishing House.

Salas, A.A. (2015). De Prometeu a la technociencia. Revista Filosofia, 26, 21-37.

Sandu, A., & Vlad, L. (2016). A Phenomenological Perspective on Transhumanism from the Perspective of the Spoken of Being. Postmodern Openings, 7(1), 67-76.

Vlad L. (2019). Umanism, transumanism, postumanism. Perspective filosofice. Lumen Publishing House.

Vlad, L. (2017). The Family, where to? From the ”Solid” Perspective to ”Liquid” Perspective. Postmodern Openings, 8(1), 67-80.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-20

How to Cite

Terec-Vlad, L. (2020). Some Approaches Regarding the Philosophy of Technology. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Philosophy & Humanistic Sciences, 8(2), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenphs/8.2/43

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now