Some Approaches Regarding the Philosophy of Technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenphs/8.2/43Keywords:
Philosophy of technology, arts, artifacts, humansAbstract
The concept of technology can be understood in many ways, especially nowadays, when we are practically connected to a multitude of increasingly complex artifacts. Talking about the philosophy of technology means bringing to the fore a multitude of related fields, as technology has changed the way we behave in the world, the way we relate to others and also the way we think and act.
In this paper we will make an analysis of the concepts of technique and technology starting from the philosophies of Antiquity and continue on the way we currently understand man's relationship with artifacts.
References
Aguilar Gordon, F.R. (2011). Reflexiones filosoficas sobre la tecnologia y sus nuevos escenarios. Sophia: Colleccion de Filosofia de la Educacion, 11, 123-174.
Aguilar Gordon, F.R., & Chamba Zarango, A.P. (2019). Reflexiones sobre la filosofia de la tecnologia en los procesos educativos. Conrado, 15(70).
Apostu, I., & Petrescu, C. G. (2017). Bărbatul și femeia: imaginea unei polemici cu privire la echitatea de gen. Lumen.
Aristotel, (2010). Metafizica. Univers Enciclopedic Gold Publishing House.
Aslam, C., & Moraru, C.F. (2017). Filosofia artei în postmodernitate. Unarte Publishing House.
Feenberg, A. (2006). What Is Philosophy of Technology?. In: Dakers J.R. (eds) Defining Technological Literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Heidegger, M. (1982). Întrebare privitoare la tehnică, in Originea Operei de Artă. Univers Publishing House.
Huidu, A. (2018). Social acceptance of ethically controversed innovative techniques related to or derived from assisted reproductive technologies–A review of literature. Eastern-European Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics, 2(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.18662/eejmhb/11
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been Modern. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Lohan, P.I. (2007). Ethos, Patos, Logos in the Religious Discourse of Father Cleopa. Jornal of Romanian Literary Studies, 12, 500-506.
Noica, C. (1968). Probleme de logică, Volume I. Academia Publishing House.
Pavel, A. A. (2016). A la decouverte de Paris: leçons de communication interculturelle. Lumen.
Platon, (2012). Theatitetos. Humanitas Publishing House.
Salas, A.A. (2015). De Prometeu a la technociencia. Revista Filosofia, 26, 21-37.
Sandu, A., & Vlad, L. (2016). A Phenomenological Perspective on Transhumanism from the Perspective of the Spoken of Being. Postmodern Openings, 7(1), 67-76.
Vlad L. (2019). Umanism, transumanism, postumanism. Perspective filosofice. Lumen Publishing House.
Vlad, L. (2017). The Family, where to? From the ”Solid” Perspective to ”Liquid” Perspective. Postmodern Openings, 8(1), 67-80.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
LUMEN PHS Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
