Outcomes of Democratic Innovations: Horizontalism as Inclusive Participation Spillover, but Fragile under Hierarchical Attacks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenpses/7.1/27Keywords:
democratic innovations, participatory democracy, municipalism, horizontalismAbstract
Anti-austerity protests revived anti- and post-hegemonic sociopolitical imaginary, around the word. In Spain, 15M movement built the premises for political projects based on direct democracy and horizontal models of social organization, as defining features of the new muncipalists who won 2015 elections in several cities. The case of Madrid has revelatory value in the debate regarding outcomes of participatory innovations, as the alliance which pioneered digital democracy and multi-actor multi-level local governance lost elections of 2019. Although a relatively large body of research investigated the feasibility of democratic innovations by contrasting their designs and implementation processes onto the matrix of their objectives and underlying ideological principles, the literature explaining their outcomes is scarce. Few studies focus on factors modeling the sustainability of participatory democracy as city regime, and the most common approach stresses out neoliberal inhibitors, as structural breaks which limit the depth and quality of participation. The present study aims to contribute to filling this gap by extending the analytical framework to encompass factors related to horizontalism, as enablers of democracy innovations. It is concluded that while horizontal governance works as a spillover of inclusive participation, it is highly vulnerable to attacks designed to vertically restructure its working processes.
References
Ancelovici, M. (2016). Occupy Montreal and the Politics of Horizontalism. In M. Ancelovici, P. Dufour, & H. Nez (Eds.), Street Politics in the Age of Austerity (pp. 175-201), Amsterdam University Press.
Buge, E., & Vandamme, P. É. (2022). Conflicts of Legitimacies in Representative Institutions: The Case of the French Citizen Convention for Climate. Representation, 1-18.
Cornwall, A. (2017). Introduction: New democratic spaces? The politics and dynamics of institutionalised participation. IDS Bulletin, 48(1A), 1-10.
d’Auvergne, T. (2018). Powerful Truths; Parrhesia, Horizontalism and Creating Community. Academia.Edu. https://www.academia.edu/11775375/Powerful_Truths_Parrhesia_Horizontalism_and_Creating_Community
Dryzek, J. (2020). The Australian citizens’ parliament: A world first. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 5(1), 1-7.
Dumitrica, D. (2022). When protest humor is not all fun: The ambiguity of humor in the 2017 Romanian anti-corruption grassroots mobilization. European Journal of Communication, 37(2), 181-197.
Flood, A. (2014). An anarchist critique of horizontalism. Anarchist Writers, May, 2.
Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogy of the Oppressed (30th ed.). The Continuum International Publishing Group. (originally published in 1968)
Gabrisch, H. (2020). Elements, origins and future of Great Transformations: Eastern Europe and global capitalism. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 31(2), 172-190.
Gerli, M., Mazzoni, M., & Mincigrucci, R. (2018). Constraints and limitations of investigative journalism in Hungary, Italy, Latvia and Romania. European Journal of Communication, 33(1), 22-36.
Ghodsee, K. R. (2019). Gendered impacts of privatisation and austerity in Eastern Europe. The Lancet, 393(10171), 519-520.
Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Stanford University Press.
Graeber, D. (2011). Debt: The first five thousand years. New York: Melville House.
Heywood, P. M. (2017). Rethinking corruption: Hocus-pocus, locus and focus. Slavonic and East European Review, 95(1), 21-48.
Higgs, C. J., & Hill, T. (2019). The role that small and medium‐sized enterprises play in sustainable development and the green economy in the waste sector, South Africa. Business Strategy & Development, 2(1), 25-31.
Janoschka, M., & Mota, F. (2021). New municipalism in action or urban neoliberalisation reloaded? An analysis of governance change, stability and path dependence in Madrid (2015–2019). Urban studies, 58(13), 2814-2830.
Kioupkiolis, A. (2018). Movements post-hegemony: how contemporary collective action transforms hegemonic politics. Social Movement Studies, 17(1), 99-112.
Kioupkiolis, A. (2021). Counter-hegemonic leadership for democratic alter-politics in our times. Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957211063428
Lee, R. (2000). Radical and postmodern? Power, social relations, and regimes of truth in the social construction of alternative economic geographies. Environment and Planning A, 32(6), 991-1009.
Lundmark, E., Coad, A., Frankish, J. S., & Storey, D. J. (2020). The liability of volatility and how it changes over time among new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(5), 933-963.
Ma, H., Lang, C., Sun, Q., & Singh, D. (2020). Capability development in startup and mature enterprises. Management Decision. 59 (6), 1442-1461.
Magnin, E., & Nenovsky, N. (2022). Diversity of Capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe: Dependent Economies and Monetary Regimes. Springer Nature.
Marandici, I. (2021). Taming the oligarchs? Democratization and state capture: the case of Moldova. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 29(1), 63-89.
Martínez, M. A., & Wissink, B. (2021). Urban movements and municipalist governments in Spain: alliances, tensions, and achievements. Social Movement Studies, 1-18.
Mayka, L. (2019). Building participatory institutions in Latin America: reform coalitions and institutional change. Cambridge University Press.
Mayne, Q., & Nicolini, C. (2020). Disrupting the party: A case study of Ahora Madrid and its participatory innovations. Harvard Kennedy School: Ash center for democratic governance and innovation.
Medina-García, C., de la Fuente, R., & Van den Broeck, P. (2021). Exploring the emergence of innovative multi-actor collaborations toward a progressive urban regime in Madrid (2015-2019). Sustainability, 13(1), 415-443.
Niessen, C., & Reuchamps, M. (2022). Institutionalising citizen deliberation in parliament: The permanent citizens’ dialogue in the German-speaking community of Belgium. Parliamentary affairs, 75(1), 135-153.
Peña-López, I. (2020). Innovative citizen participation and new democratic institutions: Catching the deliberative wave. OECD.
Polletta, F. (1998a). Contending Stories: Narrative in Social Movements. Qualitative Sociology, 22(4), 419-446.
Polletta, F. (1998b). It was like a fever... Narrative and Identity in Social Protest. Social Problems, 45, 137 – 159.
Pugh, J. (Ed.) (2009). What is Radical Politics Today?, Palgrave Macmillan.
Romanos, E., & Sádaba, I. (2016). From the Street to Institutions through the App: Digitally Enabled Political Outcomes of the Spanish Indignados Movement. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 74(4), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/ris.2016.74.4.048.
Royo, S., Pina, V., & Garcia-Rayado, J. (2020). Decide Madrid: A critical analysis of an award-winning e-participation initiative. Sustainability, 12(4), 1674-1693.
Russell, B. (2019). Beyond the local trap: New municipalism and the rise of the fearless cities. Antipode, 51(3), 989-1010.
Sampson, S. (2010). The anti-corruption industry: from movement to institution. Global Crime, 11(2), 261-278.
Sarbin, T. R. (1998). The social construction of truth. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 18(2), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0091181
Schuler, D. (2013). Creating the world citizen parliament: seven challenges for interaction designers. Interactions, 20(3), 38-47.
Skuratovych, I., Lytvyn, N., Panova, I., Ovcharenko, I., & Hryhorevska, O. (2021). Efficiency of using the potential of small business in ensuring sustainable economic growth. Entrepreneurship and sustainability issues, 8(4), 742-756.
Smith, A., & Martín, P. P. (2022). Going beyond the smart city? Implementing technopolitical platforms for urban democracy in Madrid and Barcelona. In Sustainable Smart City Transitions (pp. 280-299). Routledge.
Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge University Press.
Warburton, J. (2013). Corruption as a social process: from dyads to networks. In P. Larmour & Nick Wolanin (Eds.), Corruption and anti-corruption (pp. 221-237). ANU Press.
Williams, D. M. (2020). Relationships of horizontalism and hierarchy: exploring divergent forms of sociopolitical trust. Social Science Quarterly, 101(3), 1150-1164.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
LUMEN PSES Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
