Who is Afraid of Generation Z? The Intergenerational Gap Affecting the World of Work Post-COVID-19 Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenss/11.1/59Keywords:
Generation Z , world of work, intergenerational gap, managementAbstract
In an era of rapid changes alongside a global pandemic (COVID-19) that changed rules in the world of work, a new generation of employees, Generation Z (born 1995-2010) has been absorbed, joining three older generations, baby boomers, Generation X and Generation y. Qualitative research with high-tech company managers in Israel examined management issues constituting intergenerational gaps and affecting the new world of work. It was found that although Generation Z workers are characterized by high both technological and independent learning personal abilities giving them an advantage in relation to previous generations, there is a sharp decline in its commitment levels to an organization and managers and its ability to persevere with long-term tasks. The new generation of workers expects a greater home/work balance and indulgent workplace enabling enjoyment and a social life within work hours. Research findings provide an infrastructure for different management and leadership thinking in light of the Generation Z challenge and the gap between the different generations.
References
Bloor, M., & Wood, F. (2011). Keywords in Qualitative Methods: A Vocabulary of Research Concepts. Sage.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5 ed.). Oxford University Press.
Carter, T. (2018). Preparing generation Z for the teaching profession. Srare Journal, 1(27), 1-8. http://www.srate.org/JournalEditions/Volume27-1/Carter_Manuscript.pdf
Chillakuri, B. (2020). Understanding Generation Z expectations for effective onboarding. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(7), 1277-1296. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2020-0058
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey - Bass Publishers.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5 ed.). Sage pub.
Flick, U. (1998). An introduction to qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2005). The interview. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln, Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 695-727). Sage Publications.
Francis, T., & Hoefel, F. (2018). True Gen’: Generation Z and its implications for companies. McKinsey & Company.
Golan, D. B. (2022, February 03). The hybrid work has been with us for two years. Why are we having such a hard time cracking the model? Globes. https://www.globes.co.il/news/article.aspx?did=1001400929
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic, controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage hand-book of qualitative research (pp. 191-215). Sage Publications.
Holopainen, L., & Suslova, A. (2019). Job Satisfaction and Employee Motivation: Case Generation Z. Kajaani University of Applied Sciences.
Israel Innovation Authority. (2021, June 16). 2021 Innovation Report Snapshot. Israel Innovation Authority. https://innovationisrael.org.il/innovation-report/2021
Kirchmayer, Z., & Fratricová, J. (2020). What motivates generation Z at work? Insights into motivation drivers of business students in Slovakia. Proceedings of the innovation management and education excellence through vision (pp. 6019-6030). Ibima.
Koulopoulos, T., & Keldsen, D. (2016). Gen Z effect: The six forces shaping the future of business. Routledge.
Lanier, K. (2017). 5 things HR professionals need to know about Generation Z. Strategic HR Review, 16(6), 288-290. https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-08-2017-0051
Lin, W., Shao, Y., Li, G., Guo, Y., & Zhan, X. (2021). The psychological implications of COVID-19 on employee job insecurity and its consequences: The mitigating role of organization adaptive practices. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(3), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000896
Mahmoud, A. B., Fuxman, L., Mohr, I., Reisel, W. D., & Grigoriou, N. (2020). “We aren't your reincarnation!” workplace motivation across X, Y and Z generations. International Journal of Manpower, 42(1), 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-09-2019-0448
Mahmoud, A. B., Reisel, W. D., Fuxman, L., & Mohr, I. (2021). A motivational standpoint of job insecurity effects on organizational citizenship behaviors: A generational study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2(62), 267-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12689
Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative Researching. Sage Publication.
Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. The Falmer Press.
McCrindle, M. (2014). The ABC of XYZ: Understanding the global generations (3 ed.). McCrindle Research Pty Ltd.
McCrindle, M., & Fell, A. (2020). The Understanding the Impact of COVID-19 on the Emerging Generations. McCrindle Research Pty Ltd.
Nabahani, P. R., & Riyanto, S. (2020). Job Satisfaction and Work Motivation in Enhancing Generation Z’s Organizational Commitment. Journal of Social Science, 1(5), 234-240. https://doi.org/10.46799/jss.v1i5.39
Nadu, T. (2020). Here is Generation Z: Work attitude and Characters of Newer generation. Dogo Rangsang Research Journal, 6(10), 44-50.
Parks, E. S. (2020). Listening Across the Ages: Measuring Generational Listening Differences with the LCI-R. International Journal of Listening, 36(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2020.1748503
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 5(9), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Rallis, S. F., & Rossman, G. B. (2012). The research journey: Introduction to inquiry. Guilford Press.
Ran, A., Almagor, R., & Yosephsberg Ben-Yehushua, L. (2019). The New Learners: Characteristics of Generation Z in Class and Behind School Walls. Mofet Institute, the Inter-College Information Center.
Reiser, A. (2022, February 2). The great wave of resignation of Generation Z What can be done? Forbes. https://frnkl.co/blog-hebrew
Schroth, H. (2019). Are You Ready for Gen Z in the Workplace? California Management Review, 61(3), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619841006
Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2018). Generation Z: A century in the making. Routledge.
Shkedi, A. (2003). Words of meaning: Qualitative research-theory and practice. Ramot.
Shkedi, A. (2014). The meaning behind the words: Methodologies of qualitative research: Theory and practice (2 ed.). Ramot.
Singh, A. (2014). Challenges and issues of generation Z. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 7(16), 59-63. https://iosrjournals.org/iosr-jbm/papers/Vol16-issue7/Version-1/H016715963.pdf
Stachl, A. (2019, September 10). How Generation-Z Will Revolutionize The Workplace. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/ashleystahl/2019/09/10/how-generation-z-will-revolutionize-the-workplace/?sh=3d62c27f4f53
State of Israel. (2020, September 15). Publications and products. Central Bureau Of Statistics. https://www.cbs.gov.il/he/publications/doclib/2020/2.shnatonpopulation/st02_03.pdf
Turner, A. (2015). Generation Z: Technology and Social Interest. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 71(2), 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1353/jip.2015.0021
Twenge, J. M. (2017). IGen: Why today's super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy--and completely unprepared for adulthood--and what that means for the rest of us. Simon and Schuster.
Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational Differences in Work Values: Leisure and Extrinsic Values Increasing, Social and Intrinsic Values Decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117–1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352246
Tzabar-Ben Yehushua, N. (2016). Perceptions, strategies, and advanced instruments. In N. Tzabar-Ben Yehushua (Eds.), Trends and currents in qualitative research (pp. 11-23). Mofet Institute Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
LUMEN SS Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
