The Interview as a Research Technique in Social Work – Methodological and Practical Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenss/13.2/105Keywords:
research methodology, research in social work, interview method, qualitative researchAbstract
Meeting face-to-face with the beneficiaries of social work services and having a discussion with them, in order to diagnose the beneficiary's problem and identify the context of the case-by-case intervention, is the basic form of performing a social worker’s activity. That is precisely why, although the interview, as a research technique, is a method specific to sociological research, this technique has been taken up on a large scale in social work, not only for case intervention, but also as a research method. In general, the beneficiaries of assistential services, who are most often the subjects of scientific research in this field, are vulnerable people, so the interview poses two main challenges as a research technique. The first is organizing the framework in which the interview is carried out and the manner of conducting it by the researcher, in order to create the psychological context that favors the interviewee's communication with the researcher. The second is the way data is analyzed after collection, in order to minimize the influence of subjective interpretations on the part of the researcher. The purpose of this article is to analyze the way methodological errors can be avoided, in order to achieve a research that draws scientific conclusions with a high degree of validity and credibility.
References
Alshenqeeti, H. (2014). Interviewing as a data collection method: A critical review. English Linguistics Research, 3(1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v3n1p39
Buriro, A. G., Awan, J. H., & Lanjwani, A. R. (2017). Interview: A research instrument for social science researchers. IJSSHE-International Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities and Education, 1(4), 1-14. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/55847858/2017-INTERVIEW_A_RESEARCH_INSTRUMENT_FOR_SOCIAL_SCIENCE_RESEARCHERS-libre.pdf?1519107693=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3LRBV4ZA
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Cojocaru, Ş. (2005). Metode apreciative în asistenţa socială [Appreciative methods in social work]. Polirom.
Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Duverger, M. (1961). Methodes des sciences sociales [Methods in social sciences]. Dalloz.
Flick, U. (2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection. Sage Publications Ltd.
Fritz, R. L., & Vandermause, R. (2018). Data collection via in-depth email interviewing: Lessons from the field. Qualitative Health Research, 28(10),1640-1649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316689067
Habermas, J. (1985). The theory of communicative action (1st vol.), Reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon Press.
Hazreena, H. (2022). Interview method. In M. R. Islam, N. A. Khan, & R. Baikady (Eds.), Principles of social research methodology (pp. 207–219). Springer.
Henriksen, M. G., Englander, M., & Nordgaard, J. (2022). Methods of data collection in psychopathology: The role of semi-structured, phenomenological interviews. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 21, 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09730-5
Hofisi, C., Hofisi, M., & Mago, S. (2014). Critiquing interviewing as a data collection method. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(16), 60. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n16p60
Huidu, A. (2021). Tailoring humans: The ethics of genetic engineering. In Research anthology on emerging technologies and ethical implications in human enhancement (pp. 1-19). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8050-9.ch001
Hutchison, C. (2006). Cultural constructivism: The confluence of cognition, knowledge creation, multiculturalism, and teaching. Intercultural Education, 17(3), 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675980600841694
Irvine, L. I., Pierce, J. L., & Zussman, R. (2019). Narrative sociology. Vanderbilt University Press.
Jentoft, N., & Olsen, T. S. (2019). Against the flow in data collection: How data triangulation combined with a ‘slow’ interview technique enriches data. Qualitative Social Work, 18(2), 179-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325017712581
Jin, J., Vandenplas, C., & Loosveldt, G. (2019). The evaluation of statistical process control methods to monitor interview duration during survey data collection. Sage Open, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019854652
Khan, T. H., & MacEachen, E. (2022). An alternative method of interviewing: Critical reflections on videoconference interviews for qualitative data collection. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221090063
Miftode, V. (2011). Tratat de metodologie sociologică [Treatise on sociological methodology]. Lumen.
Monday, T. U. (2020). Impacts of interview as research instrument of data collection in social sciences. Journal of Digital Art and Humanities, 1(1), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.33847/2712-8148.1.1_2
Neha, J. (2021). Survey versus interviews: Comparing data collection tools for exploratory research. The Qualitative Report, 26(2), 541-554. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4492
O'Connor, J., & Seymour, J. (2011). Introducing NLP: Psychological skills for understanding and influencing people (neuro-linguistic programming). Red Wheel.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.137
Romero, D., Kwan, A., & Suchman, L. (2019). Methodologic approach to sampling and field-based data collection for a large-scale in-depth interview study: The Social Position and Family Formation (SPAFF) project. PLoS ONE, 14(1), e0210776. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210776
Sandu, A. (2012). Metode de cercetare în ştiinţa comunicării [Research methods in communication science]. Lumen.
Sandu, A. (2016). Social construction of reality as communicative action. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Simionovici, D., Cireaşă, D. I., Lungu, C., & Dan, M. F. (2019). GDPR aplicat. Instrument de lucru pentru implementarea Regulamentului UE 679/2016. Lumen.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
LUMEN SS Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND