The Interview as a Research Technique in Social Work – Methodological and Practical Challenges

Authors

  • Petronela Polixenia Nistor Lecturer PhD, Faculty of Orthodox Theology, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iași, Romania, 

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenss/13.2/105

Keywords:

research methodology, research in social work, interview method, qualitative research

Abstract

Meeting face-to-face with the beneficiaries of social work services and having a discussion with them, in order to diagnose the beneficiary's problem and identify the context of the case-by-case intervention, is the basic form of performing a social worker’s activity. That is precisely why, although the interview, as a research technique, is a method specific to sociological research, this technique has been taken up on a large scale in social work, not only for case intervention, but also as a research method. In general, the beneficiaries of assistential services, who are most often the subjects of scientific research in this field, are vulnerable people, so the interview poses two main challenges as a research technique. The first is organizing the framework in which the interview is carried out and the manner of conducting it by the researcher, in order to create the psychological context that favors the interviewee's communication with the researcher. The second is the way data is analyzed after collection, in order to minimize the influence of subjective interpretations on the part of the researcher. The purpose of this article is to analyze the way methodological errors can be avoided, in order to achieve a research that draws scientific conclusions with a high degree of validity and credibility.

References

Alshenqeeti, H. (2014). Interviewing as a data collection method: A critical review. English Linguistics Research, 3(1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v3n1p39

Buriro, A. G., Awan, J. H., & Lanjwani, A. R. (2017). Interview: A research instrument for social science researchers. IJSSHE-International Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities and Education, 1(4), 1-14. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/55847858/2017-INTERVIEW_A_RESEARCH_INSTRUMENT_FOR_SOCIAL_SCIENCE_RESEARCHERS-libre.pdf?1519107693=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3LRBV4ZA

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Cojocaru, Ş. (2005). Metode apreciative în asistenţa socială [Appreciative methods in social work]. Polirom.

Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Duverger, M. (1961). Methodes des sciences sociales [Methods in social sciences]. Dalloz.

Flick, U. (2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection. Sage Publications Ltd.

Fritz, R. L., & Vandermause, R. (2018). Data collection via in-depth email interviewing: Lessons from the field. Qualitative Health Research, 28(10),1640-1649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316689067

Habermas, J. (1985). The theory of communicative action (1st vol.), Reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon Press.

Hazreena, H. (2022). Interview method. In M. R. Islam, N. A. Khan, & R. Baikady (Eds.), Principles of social research methodology (pp. 207–219). Springer.

Henriksen, M. G., Englander, M., & Nordgaard, J. (2022). Methods of data collection in psychopathology: The role of semi-structured, phenomenological interviews. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 21, 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09730-5

Hofisi, C., Hofisi, M., & Mago, S. (2014). Critiquing interviewing as a data collection method. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(16), 60. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n16p60

Huidu, A. (2021). Tailoring humans: The ethics of genetic engineering. In Research anthology on emerging technologies and ethical implications in human enhancement (pp. 1-19). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8050-9.ch001

Hutchison, C. (2006). Cultural constructivism: The confluence of cognition, knowledge creation, multiculturalism, and teaching. Intercultural Education, 17(3), 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675980600841694

Irvine, L. I., Pierce, J. L., & Zussman, R. (2019). Narrative sociology. Vanderbilt University Press.

Jentoft, N., & Olsen, T. S. (2019). Against the flow in data collection: How data triangulation combined with a ‘slow’ interview technique enriches data. Qualitative Social Work, 18(2), 179-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325017712581

Jin, J., Vandenplas, C., & Loosveldt, G. (2019). The evaluation of statistical process control methods to monitor interview duration during survey data collection. Sage Open, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019854652

Khan, T. H., & MacEachen, E. (2022). An alternative method of interviewing: Critical reflections on videoconference interviews for qualitative data collection. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221090063

Miftode, V. (2011). Tratat de metodologie sociologică [Treatise on sociological methodology]. Lumen.

Monday, T. U. (2020). Impacts of interview as research instrument of data collection in social sciences. Journal of Digital Art and Humanities, 1(1), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.33847/2712-8148.1.1_2

Neha, J. (2021). Survey versus interviews: Comparing data collection tools for exploratory research. The Qualitative Report, 26(2), 541-554. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4492

O'Connor, J., & Seymour, J. (2011). Introducing NLP: Psychological skills for understanding and influencing people (neuro-linguistic programming). Red Wheel.

Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.137

Romero, D., Kwan, A., & Suchman, L. (2019). Methodologic approach to sampling and field-based data collection for a large-scale in-depth interview study: The Social Position and Family Formation (SPAFF) project. PLoS ONE, 14(1), e0210776. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210776

Sandu, A. (2012). Metode de cercetare în ştiinţa comunicării [Research methods in communication science]. Lumen.

Sandu, A. (2016). Social construction of reality as communicative action. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Simionovici, D., Cireaşă, D. I., Lungu, C., & Dan, M. F. (2019). GDPR aplicat. Instrument de lucru pentru implementarea Regulamentului UE 679/2016. Lumen.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-19

How to Cite

Nistor, P. P. . (2024). The Interview as a Research Technique in Social Work – Methodological and Practical Challenges. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Social Sciences, 13(2), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenss/13.2/105

Most read articles by the same author(s)