Intensionality, Reference and Games of Partial Information II. Semantic Verbs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/39Keywords:
Exportation, monotonicity, speaker’s reference, interpretation de dicto, Nash equilibrium, Pareto efficiency, intensionality.Abstract
In this paper, I look at the semantic behaviour of the most emblematic verb of our semantic lexicon, „refer (to)”, through the prism of the semantic features considered definitory for the extensional verbs and I show that there are strong theoretical reasons for considering that it belongs to the class of ITVs and that, in consequence, it generates structural ambiguity at each level of language in which it is involved. In this regard, I show how the conceptual framework of the games of partial information can successfully accommodate the semantic verb’s inherent ambiguity. In order to accomplish this task, I present a scenario of strategic communication involving semantic verbs and I model it as a two-agent coordination game. The cognitive dynamics peculiar to the agents’ interaction will be presented on the background of some reasonable assumptions introduced to guarantee the finding of a solution concept corresponding to the game. In this regard, after I compute the expected utilities of the strategic profiles, I determine a set of Nash equilibria and I show that the game’s unique solution can be equated with that set’s member which passes the test of Paretian efficiency. In the end, I present the picture of the interplay between the speaker’s reference and the semantic reference which emerges from the game-theoretical framework adopted here and I show some of its methodological consequences related to the way in which the key concept of reference has to be theoretically framed. This is the second part of a two-part study.References
Abbott, B. (2010). Reference. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Almog, J. (1998). The subject verb object class I. Philosophical Perspectives, 12(S12), 39-76. doi:10.1111/0029-4624.32.s12.2
Clark, R. (2012). Meaningful games. Exploring language with game theory. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
D’Ambrosio, J. (2017). Semantic verbs are intensional transitives. Mind (2017, December 21). doi:10.1093/mind/fzx029. Retrieved from http://justindambrosio.wixsite.com/philosophy/research
Forbes, G. (2013). Intensional transitive verbs. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, USA: Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/intensional-transverbs
Kripke, S. (1977). Speaker's reference and semantic reference. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 2(1), 255-276. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.1977.tb00045.x
Lappin, S. (2017). Formal semantics. In M. Aronoff & J. Ress‐Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (2nd ed.) (pp. 279-298). London, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Moltmann, F. (1997). Intensional verbs and quantifiers. Natural Language Semantics, 5(1), 1-52. doi:10.1023/a:1008245409172
Parikh, P. (1991). Communication and strategic inference. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14(5), 473-514. doi:10.1007/bf00632595
Parikh, P. (2000). Communication, meaning, and interpretation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 23(2), 185-212. doi:10.1023/a:1005513919392
Parikh, P. (2001). The use of language. Stanford, USA: CSLI Publications.
Parikh, P. (2007). Situations, rules, and conventional meaning: Some uses of games of partial information. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(5), 917-933. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.01.004
Parikh, P. (2010). Language and equilibrium. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.
Recanati, F. (2000). Oratio obliqua, oratio recta: An essay on metarepresentation. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.
Richard, M. (2013). Context and the attitudes: meaning in context. (vol. 1). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Sainsbury, M. (2018). Thinking about things. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ticak, M. (2016). What are ghost words?. Grammarly Blog. Retrieved from https://www.grammarly.com/blog/ghost-words/
Zimmermann, T. E. (1993). On the proper treatment of opacity in certain verbs. Natural Language Semantics, 1(2), 149-179. doi:10.1007/bf00372561
Zimmermann, T. E. (2006). Monotonicity in opaque verbs. Linguistics and Philosophy, 29(6), 715-761. doi:10.1007/s10988-006-9009-z
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND