(Un)professionalisation or (Re)professionalisation of the Academic in the Brave New World?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/73Keywords:
Academic profession, academic, de-professionalisation, (re)professionalisation of the academic profession, digital scholarship, academic autonomy.Abstract
Currently, the digital dimension permeates the daily activity of many professions, with all that this entails, in terms of advantages, disadvantages and challenges. The academic world is not immune to these new technological, political and social conditions and new instigations and situations emerge, which need to be studied. This article seeks to answer the following research question: Is the academic profession undergoing a process of increasing proletarianisation, which is influenced by the new universities‘ mission (in a broad way), in the sense of unprofessionalisation, or are there new conditions for academics‘ re-professionalisation experienced as a challenge? A meta-analysis of publications that focus directly on this topic was conducted through a conceptual analysis of the most recent literature addressing this topic. It is concluded that, in general, and notwithstanding institutional, local, regional, national and international specificities, there is some degree of academic‘s unprofessionalisation resulting from an increase in the functions ascribed to him/her by the political dimension that, in a context of increasing instability and control of his/her activity through the quantity and intensity of the functions to be conducted, may call into question academic autonomy, a basic foundation of the University. However, and concurrently, there is a new context which could, under certain conditions, foster the enormous challenge of re-professionalisation. As an implication of this work, there is a need to rethink this situation, which, if continued and deepened, will threaten the academic profession in some of its central dimensions, which may jeopardise the future sustainable development of our societies.References
Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories. SAGE Open, 9. doi:10.1177/2158244019829575.
Almeida, M. I., & Pimenta, S. G. (2014). Pedagogia universitária – Valorizando o ensino e a docência na universidade. [University pedagogy – Valuing education and teaching at university]. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 27, 7-31. doi:10.21814/rpe.6243.
Arimoto, A. (2015). Institutionalization of the R-T-S Nexus in the academic profession from an international, comparative perspective. In Research Institute for Higher Education, (Ed.), The Changing Academic Profession in Asia: The Formation, Work, Academic Productivity, and Internationalization of the Academy Edited and Published. RIHE International Seminar Reports No.22 (pp. 1- 25). Hiroshima University: Hiroshima, Japan.
Arvaja, M. (2018). Tensions and striving for coherence in an academic‘s professional identity work. Teaching in Higher Education, 23, 291-306. doi:10.1080/13562517.2017.1379483.
Bakthavatchaalam, V. (2018). Motivation to Conduct Research in a Rapidly Evolving Academic Environment: Study of Coimbatore’s Engineering Institutions, PhD Thesis. Plymouth: University of Plymouth.
Becker, B. A., & Eube, C. (2018). Open innovation concept: Integrating universities and business in digital age. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4. doi:10.1186/s40852-018-0091-6.
Biblioteca do Conhecimento Online (n.d.). What is b-on? Retrieved from https://www.b-on.pt/en/what-is-b-on/ (accessed on 17 January 2019).
Buffardi, A. (2018). Digital knowing and digital making in network and fab labs an intersection between culture and education. Sociology International Journal, 2. doi:10.15406/sij.2018.02.00125.
Carlotto, M., & Garcia, S. (2018). Novos saberes, novas hierarquias: Disputas contemporâneas em torno da profissão académica [New knowledge, new hierarchies: Contemporary struggles regarding the academic profession]. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 33(96). doi:10.17666/339604/2018.
Carroll, A., Lodge, J., Bagraith, R., Nugent, A., Matthews, K., & Sah, P. (2018). Higher Education Learning Framework Matrix – An Evidence-Informed Model for University Learning. Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland.
Carrozza, C. (2018). Re-conceptualizing social research in the ―digital era‖. Issues of scholarships, methods, and epistemologies. Análise Social, LIII, 652–671. doi:10.31447/as00032573.2018228.05.
Chou, C. P., & Chan, C.-F. (2017). Governance and Academic Culture in Higher Education: Under the Influence of the SSCI Syndrome. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 6, 63–75. doi:10.14425/jice.2017.6.2.63.
Costa, R. C. (2018). A pegada ideológica na narrativa da segunda revolução académica. Análise crítica da construção de um paradigma. [The Ideological Footprint on the Narrative of the Second Academic Revolution. A Critical Analysis of the Construction of a Paradigm]. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 116, 49–70. doi:10.4000/rccs.7205.
Daizen, T. (2015). University academic staffs‘ career and research productivity: Similarities and differences in six Asian nations. In Research Institute for Higher Education, (Ed.), The Changing Academic Profession in Asia: The Formation, Work, Academic Productivity, and Internationalization of the Academy Edited and Published. RIHE International Seminar Reports No.22 (pp. 163-178). Hiroshima University: Hiroshima, Japan.
Dan, M., & Fengqiao, Y. (2015). Five systematic transformations and their impacts on academic profession in China. Chinese Education & Society, 48, 248–264. doi:10.1080/10611932.2015.1119542.
Ekine, A. O. (2018). Women in academic arena: Struggles, strategies and personal choices. Gender Issues, 35, 318–329. doi:10.1007/s12147-018-9212-6.
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., Regina, B., & Terraad, C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29, 313-330.
Faria, R. (2018). Ciência à medida: Conflitos de interesse e interferência na investigação científica financiada. Sociologia [Custom tailored science: Conflicts of interest and interference in commissioned scientific research]. Revista da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto, 36, 97–118. doi:10.21747/08723419/soc36a5.
Ferreira, C. M., & Serpa, S. (2018). Online visibility, social networks and glamorous scientific publications. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 6, 58. doi:10.11114/ijsss.v6i10.3652.
Galego, C. (2016). Políticas educativas e ensino superior análise da internacionalização no contexto de trabalho da profissão acadêmica em Portugal [Educational policies and higher education: Analysis of its internationalisation in the context of the work in the academic profession in Portugal]. Revista Internacional de Educação Superior, 2, 10. doi:10.22348/riesup.v2i1.7528.
Hada, Y. (2015). Conclusion. What is a mature university in this competitive world? In Research Institute for Higher Education, (Ed.), The Changing Academic Profession in Asia: The Formation, Work, Academic Productivity, and Internationalization of the Academy Edited and Published. RIHE International Seminar Reports No.22 (pp. 179-186). Hiroshima University: Hiroshima, Japan.
Haro, F. A. (2017). O impacto de (não) ter impacto: Para uma sociologia crítica das publicações científicas [The impact of (not) having impact: For a critical sociology of scientific publications]. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 113, 83–106. doi:10.4000/rccs.6659.
Isabel, C., Luis, Y.J., & Gomez-Gajardo, F. (2015). Changes in the governance system for higher education in Peru to meet the challenges of the 21st century. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 1, 109-118.
Kasperiuniene, J., & Zydziunaite, V. (2019). A Systematic Literature Review on Professional Identity Construction in Social Media. SAGE Open, 9. doi:10.1177/2158244019828847.
Kataeva, Z., & DeYoung, A. J. (2017). Gender and the academic profession in contemporary Tajikistan: Challenges and opportunities expressed by women who remain. Central Asian Survey, 36, 247–262. doi:10.1080/02634937.2017.1287663.
Lamarra, N. F., & Marquina, M. (2013). La profesión académica en America Latina: Tendencias actuales a partir de un estudio comparado [The academic profession in Latin America. Current trends from a comparative study]. Espacios en Blanco – Serie indagaciones, 23, 99-117.
Martins, M. L. (2015). A liberdade académica e os seus inimigos [Academic freedom and its enemies]. Comunicação e Sociedade, 27, 405-420. doi:10.17231/comsoc.27(2015).2109.
Novenkova, A. Z., Abilov, A. V., Vershinina, O. A., & Medvedeva, M. Y. (2018). Influence of ratings on universities: An outward glance. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 4, 527–530.
Nóvoa, A. (2018). A modernização das universidades: Memórias contra o tempo [The modernisation of universities: Memoirs against time]. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 31, 10–25. doi:10.21814/rpe.1507611.
Novotny, A. (2017). The heterogeneity of the academic profession: The effect of occupational variables on university scientists‘ participation in research commercialization. Minerva, 55, 485–508. doi:10.1007/s11024-017-9321-5.
Nugent, A., Lodge, J. M., Carroll, A., Bagraith, R., MacMahon, S., Matthews, K.E., & Sah, P. (2019). Higher Education Learning Framework: An Evidence Informed Model for University Learning. Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland.
Oliveira, L. (2000). Desafios à universidade. Comercialização da ciência e recomposição dos saberes académicos [Challenges to the university. Commercialisation of science and recomposition of academic knowledge]. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 34, 93-116.
Oliver, A. L., & Sapir, A. (2017). Shifts in the organization and profession of academic science: The impact of IPR and technology transfer. Journal of Professions and Organization, 4, 36-54. doi: 10.1093/jpo/jow012.
Research Institute for Higher Education Hiroshima University, (Ed.). (2015). The Changing Academic Profession in Asia: The Formation, Work, Academic Productivity, and Internationalization of the Academy Edited and Published. RIHE International Seminar Reports No.22. Hiroshima, Japan: Hiroshima University.
Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2017). Agency and structure in academic development practices: Are we liberating academic teachers or are we part of a machinery supressing them? International Journal for Academic Development, 22, 95-105. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2016.1218883.
Sá, E., Dias, D., & Sá, M. J. (2018). Towards the university entrepreneurial mission: Portuguese academics‘ self-perspective of their role in knowledge transfer. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42, 784–796. doi:10.1080/0309877x.2017.1311998.
Sá, M. J., Machado-Taylor, M. L., & Carvalho, T. (2018). O ensino superior em Portugal. O impulso de Bolonha e os desafios presentes e futuros [Higher education in Portugal. The Bologna momentum and the present and future challenges]. In Cabrito, B.G.; Macedo, J.S.; Cerdeira, L., (Eds.), Ensino Superior no Brasil e em Portugal: Atualidades, Questões e Inquietações [Higher Education in Brazil and Portugal: Current Issues, Questions and Concerns] (pp. 45-69). Lisboa, Portugal: Educa.
Santos, A. I., & Serpa, S. (2017). The importance of promoting digital literacy in higher education. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 5, 90-93. doi:10.11114/ijsss.v5i6.2330.
Santos, C. D. C., Pereira, F., & Lopes, A. (2016). Efeitos da intensificação do trabalho no ensino superior: Da fragmentação à articulação entre investigação, ensino, gestão académica e transferência de conhecimento [Effects of work intensification in higher education: From work areas fragmentation to the nexus between teaching, research, leadership and knowledge exchange]. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 29, 295-321. doi:10.21814/rpe.6820.
Scanlon, E. (2018). Digital scholarship: Identity, interdisciplinarity, and openness. Frontiers in Digital Humanities, 5. doi:10.3389/fdigh.2018.00003.
Seixas, E. (2013). Desafios teóricos e epistemológicos para uma análise crítica da internacionalização do ensino superior em Portugal [Theoretical and epistemological challenges for a critical analysis of the internationalization of higher education in Portugal]. Configurações, 12, 183–197. doi:10.4000/configuracoes.2154.
Sethy, S. S. (2018). Academic ethics: Teaching profession and teacher professionalism in higher education settings. Journal of Academic Ethics, 16, 287–299. doi:10.1007/s10805-018-9313-6.
Shaker, G. G. (2016). The global common good and the future of academic professionals. Higher Learning Research Communications, 6. doi:10.18870/hlrc.v6i2.333.
Stoleroff, A. D., & Vicente, M. A. (2018). Performance assessment systems and the transformation of the academic profession in Portugal. Professions and Professionalism, 8. doi:10.7577/pp.2291.
Trif, V. (2014). Trends in the academic profession as result of ―supercomplexity.‖ Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 422–426. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.283.
Turk, M., & Ledić, J. (2016). Between teaching and research: Challenges of the academic profession in Croatia. Ceps Journal, 6, 95-111.
Vanz, S. A. S., Dominique, A. P., Sánchez, M. L. L., & Casado, E. S. (2018). Rankings universitários internacionais e o desafio para as universidades brasileiras [University rankings and the challenge for the Brazilian universities]. Encontros Bibli: Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 23, 39–51. doi:10.5007/1518-2924.2018v23n53p39.
Véliz-Calderon, D., Theurillat, D., Paredes, V., & Pickenpack, A. (2018). La evolución de la carrera académica en universidades con foco en investigación en Chile [The evolution of the academic profession in research universities in Chile]. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26. doi:10.14507/epaa.26.3262.
Watson, W. R., & Watson, S. L. (2013). Exploding the ivory tower: Systemic change for higher education. TechTrends, 57, 42-46.
Winkel, M. A., van der Rijst, R. M., Poell, R. F., & van Driel, J. H. (2018). Identities of research-active academics in new universities: Towards a complete academic profession cross-cutting different worlds of practice. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42, 539-555. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2017.1301407.
Xu, S. (2018). Issues in the interpretation of ―altmetrics‖ digital traces: A review. Front. Res. Metr. Anal., 3. doi:10.3389/frma.2018.00029.
Zachos, G., Paraskevopoulou-Kollia, E.-A., & Anagnostopoulos, I. (2018). Social media use in higher education: A review. Education Sciences, 8, 194. doi:10.3390/educsci8040194.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
