Social Services Offered by Faith-based Organizations in the Post-Secular Society

Polixenia Nistor

Abstract


Within this present paper we reviewed a series of particularities of the process of professionalization of charity and of formation of social work were reviewed, and also we highlighted the differences between the specificities of the social work carried out by secular organizations as compared to that carried out by organizations with a religious profile. A model of social Christianity was discussed, highlighting the Christian, historical foundations of social work. We started our analysis from the theory expressed regarding the post-secular society by Jurgen Habermas, in order to outline the model of social Christianity and the manner of its manifestation in faith-based social work organizations, so that in the end we were able to draw a series of theoretical conclusions regarding the types of faith-based organizations identified in the literature. The empirical research consists of a qualitative study, based on the application of semi-structured interviews, with 25 persons, priests, social workers and monks involved in the social-philanthropic activity of the Orthodox Church. The interviews were conducted between October 2018 and January 2019 within the Diocese of Iasi and were analysed using Grounded Theory. After analysing the results, emerged a theoretical model regarding the specific activity of the Romanian Orthodox Church (ROC) as a faith-based organization providing social philanthropic services.


Keywords


post secular society; faith based organizations; social work; professionalization of charity

Full Text:

View PDF

References


Ariza-Montes, A., Molina-Sanchez, H., Ramirez-Sobrino, J., & Giorgi, G. (2018). Work engagement and flourishing at work among nuns: The moderating role of human values. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01874

Beaman-Hall, L., & Nason-Clark, N. (1997). Partners or protagonists? The Transition House Movement and Conservative Churches. Affilia, 12(2), 176-196. doi:10.1177/088610999701200203

Berger, P., Davie, G., & Fokas, E. (2016). America religioasă, Europa seculară? O temă şi variaţiuni. Iaşi, Romania: Editura Universităţii ,,Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi.

Bielefeld, W., & Cleveland, W. S. (2013). Defining faith-based organizations and understanding them through research. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(3), 442-447. doi:10.1177/0899764013484090

Black, M., Basile, K., Breiding, M., Smith, S., Walters, M., & Merrick, M. (2010). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, USA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdf

Braeckman, A. (2009). Habermas and Gauchet on religion in postsecular society. A critical assessment. Continental Philosophy Review, 42(3), 279-296.

Brieskorn, N. (2010). On the attempt to recall a relationship. In N. Brieskorn, J. Habermas, M. Reder, F. Ricken & J. Schmidt (Eds.), An awareness of what is missing. Faith and reason in a post-secular age (pp. 24-35). Cambridge, UK: Polity.

Caras, A. (2013). Ethics and supervision process-fundaments of social work practice. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92, 133-141. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.649

Caroll, M. M. (1998). Social work's conceptualization of spirituality. Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 18(2).

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, UK: Sage Publications.

Chaves, M., & Tsitsos, W. (2001). Congregations and social services: What they do, how they do it, and with whom. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(4), 660-683. doi:10.1177/0899764001304003

Cheer, K., MacLaren, D., Tsey, K. (2015). The use of Grounded Theory in studies of nurses and midwives' coping processes: A systematic literature search. Contemporary Nurse: A Journal for the Australian Nursing Profession, 51(2-3), 200-219. doi:10.1080/10376178.2016.1157445

Cojocaru, D., Cojocaru, Ş., & Sandu, A. (2011). The role of religion in the system of social and medical services in post-communism Romania. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 10(28), 65-83.

Cojocaru, Ş. (2005). Metode apreciative în asistenţa socială. Iaşi, România: Polirom. Crisp, B. R. (2014). Social work and faith-based organizations. London, UK: Routledge.

Cristea, G. (2019). Inequality in education. Dimensions and solutions. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Social Sciences, 8(1), 37-48. doi:10.18662/lumenss/15

Ebaugh, H. R., Saltzman, J. S., Pipes, P. F., & Daniels, M. (2003). Where's the religion? distinguishing faith-based from secular social service agencies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42(3), 411-426. doi:10.1111/1468- 5906.00191

Etindi, D. (2002). Charitable choice and its implications for faith-based organizations. The Welfare Reformer, 1. Retrieved from https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Charitable+Choice+and+faithbased+welfare%3a+a+call+for+social+work.-a090331335

Frunză, S. (2018). Philosophical counseling and the practices of dialogue in a world built on communication. Postmodern Openings, 9(3), 1-19. doi:10.18662/po/33

Giligan, P., & Furness, S. (2005). The role of religion and spirituality in social work practice: Views and experiences of social workers and students. British Journal of Social Work, 36(4), 617–637. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch252

Gillum, T. L., Sullivan, C. M., & Bybee, D. I. (2006). The importance of spirituality in the lives of domestic violence survivors. Violence Against Women, 12(3), 240-250. doi:10.1177/1077801206286224

Graddy, E. A., & Ye, K. (2006). Faith-based versus secular providers of social services - Differences in what, how, and where. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 29(3), 309-335.

Habermas, J. (2008). Notes on a post secular society. Retrieved from http://www.signandsight.com/features/1714.html

Heyd, D. (2016). Supererogation. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/supererogation/

Horstmann, A. (2011). Ethical dilemmas and identifications of faith-based humanitarian organizations in the karen refugee crisis. Journal of Refugee Studies, 24(3), 513-532. doi:10.1093/jrs/fer031

Horton, A.; Wilkins, M.; Wright, W. (1988). Women who ended abuse: What religious leaders and religion did for these victims. In A. L. Horton & J. A. Williamson (Eds.), Abuse and religion: When praying isn't enough. Lexington, USA: Lexington Books.

Huidu, A. (2019). Parsson and Săvulescu’s ”Unfit for the Future” or the starting point for the deconstruction of the concept of parentality. Postmodern Openings, 10(1), 200-219. doi:10.18662/po/63

Ignătescu, C. (2017). Interpretation of the legal norm. Applications of the principle ubi lex non distinguit, nec nos distinguere debemus. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 4(2), 41-49. doi:10.18662/eljpa/12

Li, E., Fernandez y Garcia, E., Freedman, L., & Miller, E. (2016). Exploring the role of faith based organizations in addressing adolescent relationship abuse. Violence Against Women, 22(5), 609-624. doi:10.1177/1077801215608702

Lytch, C. (2004). Choosing church: What makes a difference for teens. Louisville, USA: Westmister John Knox Press.

Muntean, A. (2007). Supervizarea. Aspecte practice şi tendinţe actuale. Iaşi, Romania: Polirom.

Nistor, P. (2018a). The charitable foundations of social assistance. Eastern European Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics, 2(2), 15-30. doi:10.18662/eejmhb/12

Nistor, P. (2018b). The faith-based organization in the post-secular society. Logos Universality, Mentality, Education, Novelty: Social Sciences, 7(2), 17-35. doi:10.18662/lumenss/07

Nistor, P. (2018c). Social services offered by faith-based organizations in the postsecular society. Logos, Universality, Mentality, Education, Novelty: Social Sciences, 7(2), 17-35. doi:10.18662/lumenss/07

Nistor, P. (2019a). Philanthropical practices and professionalization of social assistance in the Orthodox Church. A specialist’s perception. Postmodern Openings, 10(1), 68-99. doi:10.18662/po/56

Nistor, P. (2019b). From philanthropy to Christian social assistance. The perspective of beneficiaries of social-philanthropical services of the Romanian Orthodox Church. Postmodern Openings, 10(1), 100-135. doi:10.18662/po/57

Philantropy. (n.d.). In Merriam Webster Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/philanthropy

Reder, M. (2010). How far can faith and reason be distinguished? In N. Brieskorn, J. Habermas, M. Reder, F. Ricken & J. Schmidt, An awareness of what is missing. faith and reason in a post-secular age (pp. 36-50). Cambridge, USA: Polity.

Reneve, G., & Dunajevas, E. (2014). The differences of social work process in faith-related and secular NGOs. Socialinė Teorija, Empirija, Politika ir Praktika, 9. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/Antonio/Downloads/3778- Article%20Text-2872-0-10-19700101.pdf

Ricken, F. (2010). Postmetaphysical reason and religion. In N. Brieskorn, J. Habermas, M. Reder, F. Ricken & J. Schmidt, An awareness of what is missing. faith and reason in a post-secular age (pp. 51-58). Cambridge, USA: Polity.

Sandu, A. (2018). Constructionist Grounded Theory- GT. Conceptual and methodological clarifications. Revista Românească pentru Educație Multidimensională, 10(1), 183-209. doi:10.18662/rrem/28

Sandu, A., & Caras, A. (2013). Deconstruction of charity. Postmodern ethical approaches. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 12(3), 72-99.

Sandu, A., & Ignătescu, C. (2017). Retributivity and public perception on the noncustodial sanctions. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 9(3), 103-128. doi:10.18662/rrem/2017.0903.07

Sandu, A., & Unguru, E. (2018). Could neuroenhancement be an ethical approach in social Practice? BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 9(1S), 21-29.

Sbaraini, A., Carter, S. M., Evans, W., & Blinkhorn, A. (2011). How to do a grounded theory study: A worked example of a study of dental practices. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(128), 1-10. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-128

Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x

Sider, R. J., & Unruh, H. R. (2004). Typology of religious characteristics of social service and educational organizations and programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(1), 109-134. doi:10.1177/0899764003257494

Siedenburg, F. (1922). The religious value of social work. American Journal of Sociology, 27(5), 637-645. doi:10.1086/213403

Silverman, J. G., Raj, A., Mucci, L. A., & Hathaway, J. E. (2001). Dating violence against adolescent girls and associated substance use, unhealthy weight control, sexual risk behavior, pregnancy, and suicidality. JAMA, 286(5), 572-579. doi:10.1001/jama.286.5.572

Unguru, E. (2019). The perception of social workers in the N-E area of Romania on supervision. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(1), 224-255. doi:10.18662/rrem/108




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/po/95

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright © Postmodern Openings | A LUMEN Peer Reviewed Gold Open Access Journal |

Journal covered in | Web of Science (WOS); EBSCO; ERIH+; Google Scholar; Index Copernicus; Ideas RePeC; Econpapers; Socionet; CEEOL; Ulrich ProQuest; Cabell, Journalseek; Scipio; Philpapers; SHERPA/RoMEO repositories; KVK; WorldCat; CrossRef; J-GATE