Social Construction of the Legal System. Research in the Northeastern Region of Romania
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/111Keywords:
Legal system, public perception, social constructionism.Abstract
This research pursues the social construction of the idea of justice among citizens by measuring the public opinion on the legal system in Romania. A number of aspects involved in the process of social construction of the concept of justice were considered, such as the role of the legal system in Romanian society, the level of transparency of the legal system, the implementation of ethics in Romanian legal system, the level of perceived remuneration of Romanian legal system etc. The research was conducted in the Northeastern region of Romania, based on sociological inquiry through questionnaire. The thematic axes of the questionnaire aimed: the sources of public information on the functioning of the legal system, the perceived level of professionalism of the personnel in the legal system, the public perception on integrity and the observance of ethical standards in the legal system, the level of remuneration in Romanian legal system, the respect for the state of law in Romania, the trust in the component institutions of the legal system in Romania.
References
Berger, P.L., & Luckmann, T. (2008). Construirea socială a realităţii. Bucureşti: Editura Art.
Bicen, H., & Taspolat, A. (2019). Students’ views on the teaching process based on social media supported flipped classroom approach. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 10(4), 115-144. doi:10.18662/brain/08
Budevici Puiu, L. (2020). The Necessity of Change and Development of the Higher Education Institution in the Age of Globalisation. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(1), 350-356. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/rrem/218
Calhoun, C. (1995). Standing for something. Journal of Philosophy, 92(5), 235-260.
Chaikovska, O., Holovach, T., Melnyk, L., & Kuzo, L. (2020). Prosocial Behaviour of Teenagers and Adolescents: Concepts and Tendencies. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(1), 226-243. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/rrem/211
Cohen, A., & Vauchez, A. (2011). The Social Construction of Law: The European Court of Justice and Its Legal Revolution Revisited. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 7, 417-431.
Cojocaru, D., Sandu, A., & Oprea, L. (2013). Încrederea în relaţia medic-pacient. Oprea, L., Gavrilovici, C., Vicol, M. C., & Astărăstoae, V. (coord.), Relaţia medic-pacient (pp. 95-123). Iaşi, România: Editura Polirom.
Conrad, P., & Schneider, J.W. (1992). Deviance and medicalization: From badness to sickness. Philadelphia: Expanded ed. Philadelphia, Temple Univ. Press.
Cox, D., La Caze, M., & Levine, M. (2014). Integrity. In Van Hooft, S. (ed.), The handbook of virtue ethics (pp. 201-209). United Kingdom: Acumen Publishing. Cox, D., La Caze, M., & Levine, M. (2017). Integrity. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/integrity/ DC
News (2017). Sondaj: Încrederea în justiţie, prăbuşită. Sociolog curs, avertisment. Retrieved from: https://www.dcnews.ro/sondaj-increderea-in-justi-ie-prabuita-sociolog-curs-avertisment_567903.html
Dechev, M., Galabov, M., & Georgieva-Trifonova, T. (2019). Application of nonrelational databases in the social networks. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 10(4), 56-72. doi:10.18662/brain/05
De Wulf, K., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Iacobucci, D. (2001). Investments in consumer relationships: A cross-country and cross-industry exploration. Journal of Marketing, 65(4), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.4.33.18386.
Digi FM, (2019). Românii îşi pierd tot mai mult încrederea în justiţie, arată cel mai recent Eurobarometru. Retrieved from: https://www.digifm.ro/stiri/romanii-isipierd-tot-mai-mult-increderea-in-justitie-arata-cel-mai-recent-eurobarometru35717.
European Commission (2017). The 2017 Eu Justice Scoreboard, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/justice_scoreboard_2017_en.pdf.
Frunza, S., Medveschi, I., Frunza, M., & Grad, N. O. (2019). Aspects regarding ethical counseling in organizations. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 18(54), 3-17.
Gergen, K. J. (2005). Social Construction in Context. Sage Publishing Inc. Gila, C. (2019). The role of European personalities in building cooperation in the field of education. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Political Sciences & European Studies, 5(1), 36-45. doi:10.18662/lumenpses/07
Ghircuta, G. (2016). Încrederea românilor în justiţie şi sistemul judiciar în scădere accentuată. Eurobarometru. Retrieved from: https://www.mediafax.ro/social/increderea-romanilor-in-justitie-si-sistemul-judiciar-in-scadere-accentuataeurobarometru-15574460.
Habermas, J. (1985). The Theory Of Communicative Action. Heinemann Educ. Habermas, J. (2000). Conştiinţa morală şi acţiunea comunicativă. Bucureşti: Editura All Educational.
INSCOP Research (2016). Încrederea în instituţii. Retrieved from: http://www.inscop.ro/aprilie-2016-increderea-in-institutii/.
INSCOP Research, (2015). Încrederea în instituţii. Retrieved from: http://www.inscop.ro/decembrie-2015-incredere-institutii/.
INSCOP Research. (2019). Sondaj topul încrederii în instituţii interne şi internaţionale. Armata, Biserica şi Jandarmeria pe primele locuri/ NATO şi Parlamentul European la capitolul instutiţii externe. Retrieved from: https://www.g4media.ro/sondaj-deopinie-inscop-topul-increderii-in-institutii-interne-si-internationale-armatabiserica-si-jandarmeria-pe-primele-locuri-nato-si-parlamentul-european.html
Jackson, B. (2019). Ethical Principles in the Modern World. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Social Sciences, 8(2), 63-75. doi:10.18662/lumenss/25
Lazorenko, O., Zabolotna, O., & Magas, G. (2019). Implementation of the Educational Program of Training of Border Guards in the specialty “State Border Security” in Ukraine. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(4Sup1), 117-133. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/rrem/181
Loseke, D.R., & Best, J. (eds.), (2003). Social problems: Constructionist readings. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
Luca, S., & Bulancea, D.-M. (2008). Deontologia magistratului. In Pivniceru, M. M. & Luca, C. (coord.), Deontologia profesiei de magistrat. Repere contemporane. Bucureşti: Editura Hamangiu.
Mayer, R.C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
O'Neill, O. (2001). Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge, Regatul Unit al Marii Britanii: Cambridge University Press.
Pivniceru, M.M., & Luca, C. (2008). Reglementări internaţionale cu relevanţă în materia deontologiei judiciare. Pivniceru, M.M., & Luca, C. (coord.), Deontologia profesiei de magistrat. Repere contemporane. Bucureşti: Editura Hamangiu.
Popa, I. (2007). Tratat privind profesia de magistrat în România. Editura Universul Juridic, Bucureşti. p.181.
Priel, D. (2019). Law as a Social Construction and Conceptual Legal Theory. 38 Law and Philosophy, Forthcoming. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3339582.
Rosenfeld, R. (2017). The Social Construction of Crime. DOI: 10.1093/OBO/9780195396607-0050. Retrieved from: https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780195396607/obo-9780195396607-0050.xml.
S. T.(2017). Încrederea în justiţie s-a prăbuşit. Câţi români mai cred în procurori şi judecători. Retrieved from: https://www.antena3.ro/actualitate/justitie/increderea-injustitie-s-a-prabusit-cati-romani-mai-cred-in-procurori-si-judecatori444010.html.
Sandu, A. & Căbălău, C. (2014). Ethical Perspectives on the Magistrate’s Independency Principle. Anuarul Universităţii „Petre Andrei” din Iaşi, Fascicula: Drept, Ştiinţe Economice, Ştiinţe Politice, 14, 121-134.
Sandu, A. (2013). Contributions to a Constructionist Interpretation of Social Contract Theories. A Semiotical Approaches. Buletin Ştiinţific, 22(2), 37–53.
Sandu, A. (2017a). Construcţia socială a profesiei de consilier de probaţiune. Iaşi, România: Editura Lumen.
Sandu, A. (2017b). O etică centrată pe valori în sfera publică. Iaşi, România: Editura Lumen.
Sandu, A., & Caras (Frunză), A. (2014). Some considerations on the construction of ethics policies. Shared ethics and communicative action. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 846-854. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.325.
Sandu, A., & Unguru, E. (2017). Several Conceptual Clarifications on the Distinction between Constructivism and Social Constructivism. Postmodern Openings, 8(2), 51-61. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/po/2017.0802.04.
Schneider, J.W. (1985). Social problems theory: The constructionist view. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 209–229, DOI: 10.1146/annurev.so.11.080185.001233.
Sirbu, L. (2019). Eurobarometru: Încrederea în independenţa justiţiei în scădere. Cauza principală: presiunile politicului. Retrieved from: https://adevarul.ro/news/eveniment/eurobarometru-Incredereaindependenta-justitiei-scadere-cauza-principala-presiunile-politicului1_5cc2fa30445219c57efc079f/index.html.
Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J.I. (1973). Social problems: A reformulation. Social Problems, 21, 145–159, DOI: 10.1525/sp.1973.21.2.03a00010.
Staubli, A. (2017). Trusting the Police Comparisons across Eastern and Western Europe. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
Zamfir, E. (2019). Towards an integrated social policy in post-december Romania: Between aspiration and reality. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 67, 21- 36. DOI: 10.33788/rcis.67.2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND