Social Factors in the Digital Government Formation in Russia

Authors

  • Vladimir Petrovich Vasiliev Lomonosov Moscow State University
  • Natalia Gennadievna Dekhanova Lomonosov Moscow State University
  • Yury Aleksandrovich Kholodenko Lomonosov Moscow State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2Sup1/195

Keywords:

E-government, digital platform, digital divide, administrative reform, authorities` openness, globalization

Abstract

Transformation of the e-government into the digital one is analyzed in the context of postmodern socio-economic factors. The stages of implementing accessibility and openness of executive authorities in the framework of administrative reform in the Russian Federation are presented. The weak and strong sides of forming accessibility of authorities in the electronic environment are identified. The risks of the digital divide associated with factors not only of an economic but also of a status nature are identified. Data on the use of digital communication by the population related to the conditions of social and spatial development are presented. The article considers the target directions of the transition to the digital government technology platform and the expected results in the short term. The transition from electronic to digital development of public administration is defined as a path to project management based on the creation of a new material base and the implementation of the principles of sustainable development. The social components of the transition – elimination of social Internet exclusion-are shown.

Author Biographies

Vladimir Petrovich Vasiliev, Lomonosov Moscow State University

PhD in Economics, associate professor, Head of the Subdepartment of Sociology of Public Administration, Department of sociology, Lomonosov Moscow State University

Natalia Gennadievna Dekhanova, Lomonosov Moscow State University

PhD in Sociology, associate professor, Associate professor of the Subdepartment Sociology of Public Administration, Department of sociology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation

Yury Aleksandrovich Kholodenko, Lomonosov Moscow State University

PhD in Economics, associate professor, Associate professor of the Subdepartment Sociology of Public Administration , Department of sociology, Lomonosov Moscow State University

References

Almeida, G. (2014). The status of e-government research: A bibliometric study. Business and Management Review, 11, 7-22.

Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: Theoretical and empiric analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.

Boston Consulting Group. (2017). Embracing industry 4.0 – and rediscovering growth. https://www. bcg.com/capabilities/operations/embracing-industry-4.0- rediscovering-growth.aspx

Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x

Center for Strategic Development. (2018). Instituty I obshhestvo. Gosudarstvo kak platforma [Institutions and society. Government as a platform]. https://www.csr.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/GOSUDARSTVO-KAK- PLATFORMA_internet.pdf

Chadwick, A., & May, C. (2003). Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the internet: “E‐government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance, 16(2), 271–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.00216

Dekhanova, N., & Dekhanov, A. (2019) Jelektronnoepravitel'stvo v sovremennoj Rossii: Tendencii I perspektivy razvitija [E-Government in modern Russia: Trends and development prospects]. Sociopolitical sciences, 3, 2019. 173-177.

Evans, P., & Gawer, A. (2016). The rise of the platform enterprise. A global survey. Center for Global Enterprise. https://www.thecge.net/app/uploads/2016/01/PDF-WEB-PlatformSurvey_01_12.pdf

Government of the Russian Federation. (2017). Programma «Cifrovajaj ekonomika Rossijskoj Federacii», utverzhdennaja Rasporjazheniem Pravitel'stva Rossijskoj Federaciiot 28 ijulja 2017 g. №1632 [The program "Digital economy of the Russian Federation", approved by the Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of July 28, 2017, no. 1632]. http://static.government.ru/media/files/

Heeks, R., & Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 243-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.005

Kuprjashin, G. L., & Solov'jov, A. I. (2016) Gosudarstvennyj menedzhment [Public administraition. Urait.

Lathrop, D., & Ruma, L. (2010). Open government. O'Reilly Media, Inc.

Layne, K., & Lee, J. W. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0740-624x(01)00066-1

Markeeva, A. V., & Gavrilenko, O. V. (2019). Future of platform economy: Digital platform as new economic actor and instance of social control. Postmodern Openings, 10(3), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/85

McKinsey Global Institute. (2015). Unlocking the potential of the Internet of Things. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-in sihts/the-internet-of-things-the-value-of-digitizing-the-physical-world

Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00196

Morgeson, F., & Mithas, S. (2009). Does e‐government measure up to e‐business? Comparing end user perceptions of U.S. Federal Government and e‐business web sites. Public Administration Review, 7, 740-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02021.x

Morvan, L., Hintermann, F., & Vazirani, M. (2016). Five ways to win with digital platforms. G-20 Young Entrepreneur Alliance. https://www.accenture.com/us-en/_acnmedia/PDF-29/Accenture-FiveWays-To-Win-With-Digital-Platforms-Full-Report.PDF

Rejting otkrytosti federal'nyh organov ispolnitel'noj vlasti-2016. VCIOM [The rating of openness of the Federal bodies of Executive power in 2016. Polls]. https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=115980

Schwab, K. (2016). Chetvertaja promyshlennaja revoljucija [Fourth industrial revolution]. Acsmo.

Shklyaruk, M. S. (2019). Gosudarstvo kak platforma: Ljudi I tehnologii [Government as a Platform: People and technologies]. RANEPA.

United Nations (UN). United Nations e-government survey 2018. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2018 (20.02.2019).

Van Dijk, J. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. SAGE Publications.

Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., & Moon, M. J. (2006). Linking citizen satisfaction with-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory, 15(3),371-391. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui021

West, D. M. (2005). Digital government technology and public sector performance. Princeton University Press.

World Bank. (2016, January 14). World development report 2016: Digital dividends. World Bank Publications.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-07

How to Cite

Vasiliev, V. P., Dekhanova, N. G., & Kholodenko, Y. A. (2020). Social Factors in the Digital Government Formation in Russia. Postmodern Openings, 11(2 Supl 1), 317-326. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2Sup1/195

Issue

Section

Theoretical articles

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now