Exploring the Experience of the World's Leading Countries in Inclusive Growth as Part of the Post-Industrial Economy: Challenges and Perspectives

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2Sup1/189

Keywords:

inclusive growth, development, economic relations, inclusive growth index, inclusive growth rates

Abstract

The main goal of the article is to study the experience of leading countries in the field of inclusive growth.The article considers the main prerequisites for the emergence of inclusive economic growth in the context of ensuring the interests of all segments of the population of the world community. The importance of introducing inclusive programs in the socio-economic sphere of each country is substantiated as the main prerequisite for ensuring economic security, stability and the development of democratization of society. The basic structure of the inclusive growth of the economy was analysed in terms of its main indicators, which together constitute a comprehensive structure for assessing the level of economic stability and democracy. The numerical values of the main indicators of inclusive growth were considered among the representative countries that have been on the leading positions in the field of introducing inclusive growth in their own economies for more than a year. Specific programs for inclusive growth were reviewed among the countries that were being considered. For clarity, countries from different geographical latitudes and with various established paradigms of economic relations were selected as the countries to be accepted. The article examined the programs of inclusive growth of such countries as Norway, Sweden, China and the United States of America. For each country, the main premises, prerequisites, successes and shortcomings of the implementation of inclusive economic growth programs were identified.

References

Andersen, G. (2015). The welfare state and economic performance. https://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/c3cd2706e07b4fc7860533f1ae8ad5d8/sou-201553-the-welfare-state-and-economic-performance.pdf

Bailey, M., & Dunarski, S. (2011). Gains and gaps: Changing inequality in US college entry and completion. NBER Working Paper 17633, National Bureau of Economic Research. https://users.nber.org/~dynarski/Bailey_Dynarski_Final.pdf

Berglund, T., & Esser, U. (2014). Modell i förändring – landrapport om Sverige, Nord Mod 2030 [Model in change. Swedish country report]. http://su.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?faces-redirect=true&language=sv&searchType=SIMPLE&query=&af=%5B%5D&aq=%5B%5B%5D%5D&aq2=%5B%5B%5D%5D&aqe=%5B%5D&pid=diva2%3A714395&noOfRows=50&sortOrder=author_sort_asc&onlyFullText=false&sf=all

Berhanu, G (2011). Inclusive education in Sweden: Responses, challenges, and prospects. Girma Berhanu. International Journal of Special Education, 26(2), 128-148.

Castello, A. (2010). Inequality and growth in advanced economies: an empirical investigation. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 8(3), 293-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-010-9133-4

Corak, M., & Piranio, P. (2011). The intergenerational transmission of employers. Journal of Labor Economics, 29(1), 37-68. https://doi.org/10.1086/656371

Darvas, Z. (2016). Some are more equal than others: new estimates of global and regional inequality. Working Paper, 8, 20-21. https://www.bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WP_08_16-1.pdf

Dolvik, J., Fløtten, T., Hippe, J. M., & Jordfalf, B. (2014). The Nordic model towards 2030. A new chapter? Fafo.

Forslund, S., & Vikstrom, H. (2011). Arbetsmarknadspolitikens effekter påsysselsättning och arbetslöshet – en översikt [Labour market policy effects on employment and unemployment]. Report 2011, 7, 7. https://www.ifau.se/globalassets/pdf/se/2011/r11-07-arbetsmarknadspolitikens-effekter-pa-sysselsattning-och-arbetsloshet-en-oversikt.pdf

Fredriksson, P., Ockert, B., & Oosterbeek, H. (2013). Long-term effects of class size. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(1), 125-128. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjs048

Khomenko, A. (2018). Theoretical and practical aspects of inclusive economic development. Kitaêznavčì doslìdžennâ, 1, 69-76. https://doi.org/10.15407/chinesest2018.01.069

Schmid, G (2015). Sharing risks of labour market transitions: Towards a system of employment insurance. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 53(1), 70-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12041

Silver, H. (2007). The process of social exclusion: The dynamics of an evolving concept. Chronic Poverty Research Centre, Manchester. 200-202.

Sklyarov, R. (2017). How to become the first economy of the world. Recipe for success from the USA. https://day.kyiv.ua/en/article/ekonomika/yak-staty-pershoyu-ekonomikoyu-svitu-recept-uspihu-vid-ssha.

Solt, F. (2016). The Standardized World Income Inequality Database. Social Science Quarterly, 97. http://fsolt.org/swiid/

Varnavsky, V. (2016). Derzhavno-pryvatne partnerstvo v haluzi okhorony zdorov'ya: mizhnarodnyy dosvid [Public-Private Partnership in Healthcare: An International Experience]. Health Care Management, 1(26), 9-15.

Wennemo, A. (2014). Det gemensamma – om den svenska välfärdsmodellen [What we have in common: On the Swedish welfare model]. https://www.adlibris.com/se/bok/det-gemensamma-om-den-svenska-valfardsmodellen-9789186743390

World Economic Forum. (2018). The Inclusive Development Index. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-inclusive-development-index-2018

Downloads

Published

2020-09-07

How to Cite

GONTAR, Z., MARCHUK, V., DURMAN, O., DENKOVYCH, N., & DUDKEVYCH, V. (2020). Exploring the Experience of the World’s Leading Countries in Inclusive Growth as Part of the Post-Industrial Economy: Challenges and Perspectives. Postmodern Openings, 11(2 Supl 1), 222-237. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2Sup1/189

Issue

Section

Theoretical articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)